Does the timestamp of the order referred to in Article 3(2) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/1155 refer to the timestamp of the order reception in the system’s gateway or the timestamp that the matcher applies when the order is registered in the order book?

Can an entity, which is part of a group subject to consolidated supervision, rely on intragroup transactions to fulfil the requirements of the representativeness obligation set out under Article 7a(3), point d, of EMIR?

Can CASPs offer crypto-asset lending services under MiCA, and if so, under which conditions, in particular with respect to the use of clients’ crypto-assets?

How should the perimeter of advice on crypto-assets under MiCA be understood, and to what extent is it comparable to the notion of investment advice under MiFID II?

In particular, do introductory services – where a person recommends a crypto-asset service provider and/or a crypto-asset service to a client, without recommending specific transactions on crypto-assets – fall within the scope of advice on crypto-assets under MiCA?

Under the new clearing threshold regime which distinguishes between financial and non-financial counterparties, and uncleared and cleared trades, how should the second AAR condition referred to under Article 7a(1) of EMIR be assessed?