How should the crypto-asset services of ‘exchange of crypto assets for funds’ or ‘exchange of crypto assets for other crypto assets’ (Article 3(1)(16c and d respectively) of MiCA), ‘execution of orders for crypto-assets on behalf of clients’ (Article 3(1)(16e), and ‘reception and transmission of orders for crypto-assets on behalf of clients’ (Article 3(1)(16g)) be distinguished from one another?

We have service providers (Market Axess), who classify themselves as DORA-relevant because they offer regulated financial services (ARM and APA). However, they do not see themselves obligated to make contractual adjustments according to Article 30. This is because "financial services" would not fall under the definition of "ICT service" as per Article 3(21) of DORA. Additionally, this requirement would only apply to non-regulated companies. Is this understanding correct?

I seek clarification regarding the obligations of Crypto-Asset Service Providers (CASPs) under Article 75 of the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) concerning the ability for customers to withdraw specific crypto assets. Specifically, does Article 75 require CASPs to enable customers to withdraw every cryptocurrency offered for trading on the platform? For example, if a cryptocurrency exchange allows customers to trade Dogecoin but faces technical limitations in facilitating direct Dogecoin withdrawals, would it suffice to offer a conversion option, allowing customers to exchange Dogecoin for Bitcoin, Ethereum, or fiat currency, which they can then withdraw?

Does a European crowdfunding service provider (“ECSP”) have the right to link the individual portfolio management of loans to the bulletin board functionality by not only allocating investors funds to one or multiple crowdfunding projects on ECSP's crowdfunding platform but also by allowing investor a possibility of automatically investing in the loans published on the bulletin board?

Which licensed activity has to be selected for the licensed activity dropdown in the Register of Information if the entity is a legal protection insurance? According to the Annex of Solvency II it is the class 17, but class 17 is not available in the choices for the drop down field.