When applying the exclusions referred to in paragraphs 16-18 of the guidelines, can fund managers consider the underlying project for use of proceeds instruments or should the manager always consider the whole issuer?

Are the exemptions from the obligation to produce a prospectus for offers of fungible securities that are set out in Article (1), paragraph 4, points (da) and (db) of the Prospectus Regulation (as amended by the Listing Act) also applicable to secondary issuances of existing shares, provided that all other requirements are met?

NB: Secondary issuances of existing shares are those initiated by an offeror (and not an issuer), as described in Article 14, 1st paragraph, point c) and Article 15, 1st paragraph, point d) of the Prospectus Regulation (prior to its amendment by the Listing Act). A concrete example are the offers of existing NBG shares realised in 2023 and 2024 under the simplified prospectus regime for secondary issuance. Such offers do not involve any increase in share capital.

Do the requirements of the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) apply to Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) that are not classified as Crypto-Asset Service Providers (CASPs) under the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCAR) as of December 30, 2024 and are benefiting from the MiCAR transition period?"

Can Member States introduce limitations on the life and/or the life-cycles of ELTIFs under Regulation (EU) 2015/760, as revised, by imposing for instance a mandatory cap on the maximum life of ELTIFs?

Are sub-threshold alternative investment fund managers (AIFMs) as referred to in Article 3(2) of Directive 2011/61/EU (“AIFMD”), which have chosen to opt-in to the application of the AIFMD according to Article 3(4) of that Directive, captured within the scope of application of Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 (“DORA”) under Articles 2(1)(k) and 2(3)(a) of DORA, if the thresholds regarding assets under management (“AuM”) referred to under Article 3(2) of AIFMD are not exceeded by such AIFM?