Could counterparties that are subject to the active account requirements (i.e. to hold an active account, clear at least a representative number of trades in this active account and the subsequent reporting requirements) and that are part of a group subject to consolidated supervision in the Union, outsource these obligations to another entity of the group?

Could counterparties that are subject to the active account requirements and that are part of a group, outsource the notification to the relevant competent authority and ESMA, as mentioned in the second subparagraph of Article 7a(1) of EMIR, to another entity of the group subject to consolidated supervision in the Union that it belongs to ?

Should the requirement to clear at least a representative number of trades in an active account held at an EU CCP be performed at individual level or group level for the counterparties belonging to a group?

Regarding the requirement to clear at least a representative number of trades, should the trades be representative of the activity of the group or of the activity of the individual entities within the group?

Should the requirement to hold at least one active account at an EU CCP be performed at individual level or at group level?