Are investment firms allowed to use rebates and discounts to lower fees for clients?

Article 5(2) of MiCA states that “when a crypto-asset is admitted to trading on the initiative of a trading platform and a crypto-asset white paper has not been published in accordance with Article 9 in the cases required by this Regulation [emphasis added], the operator of that trading platform for crypto-assets shall comply with the requirements set out in paragraph 1 of this Article”.

In turn, Article 9 requires offerors and persons seeking admission to trading of crypto-assets other than ARTs or EMTs to publish their crypto-asset white papers and any marketing materials.

However, recital 22 of MiCA states that “Where crypto-assets have no identifiable issuer, they should not fall within the scope of Title II, III or IV of this Regulation”.

Does the expression “in the cases required by this Regulation” mean that Article 5(2) exempts operators of trading platforms from the requirements of Article 5 for crypto-assets without an identifiable issuer?

Can persons who are authorized in writing by the issuer to offer crypto-assets to the public conduct this activity on a commercial basis, continuously, repeatedly, and possibly for different issuers (whether concurrently or consecutively) without having a MiCA CASP license for the crypto-asset service 'placing of crypto-assets'?

Should the business model whereby a crypto-asset service provider (CASP) provides exchange services but only ever allows clients to collect their balance in fiat currency be allowed?

What are the requirements for the statement of continuous compliance with reporting and disclosure obligations under IV. in Annex IX to the Prospectus Regulation? More specifically, (i) is it possible to add any disclaimers to this statement, (ii) when is an issuer considered to have ‘continuous compliance’, (iii) to which time period should the statement pertain (i.e. does the statement need to cover the entire period that the issuer’s securities have been admitted to trading) and (iv) are issuers allowed to use an ‘exempted document’ drawn up using Annex IX if this statement is not ‘clean’?