ESMA_QA_1341
15/11/2019
Subject Matter
Redemption Date
    How should the ‘Redemption Date’ field be completed for active and inactive underlying exposures? (RREL9; CREL11; CRPL9; AUTL9; CMRL9; LESL9; ESTL9)
    ESMA Answer
    15-11-2019

      [ESMA 33-128-563 Securitisation Q&A, Q&A 5.3.3]

      In the event that an underlying exposure is an active underlying exposure as defined in the RTS on disclosure, then the Redemption Date field should be completed with ‘ND5’. This is because the underlying exposure has not been redeemed nor has completed had a recovery process completed. In the event that an underlying exposure is an inactive underlying exposure as defined in the RTS on disclosure, the Redemption Date field should be completed in the following manner:

      • If the underlying exposure has been redeemed (i.e. fully paid back as set out in the contractual terms of the underlying exposure, including prepayments), then the Redemption Date field should be completed with the date at which the redemption occurred.
      • If the underlying exposure has defaulted and the recovery process is now completed, then the Redemption Date field should be completed with the date at which the recovery process was completed.
      • In all other cases for the underlying exposure becoming inactive (e.g. repurchases, substitutions, etc.), the Redemption Date field should be completed with ‘ND5’.
      Status: Answer Published

      Additional Information

      Level 1 Regulation
      Securitisation Regulation (EU) 2017/2402
      Topic
      Securitisation Disclosure Templates