Skip to main content
Home
  • About ESMA
    • Governance Structure
      • Board of Supervisors
      • Management Board
      • Senior Management
      • Joint Committee
      • CCP Supervisory Committee
      • CCP Resolution Committee
      • Joint Monitoring Mechanism
      • Standing Committees
      • SMSG
      • Board of Appeal
      • Ethics and Conflicts of interest
    • Internal Organisation
      • Strategy and Work Programme
      • Working Methods
      • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
    • International Cooperation
    • Legal Notice and Data Protection
    • Transparency and Access to Documents
    • Agenda
    • Careers
    • Procurement Opportunities
  • ESMA's Activities
    • Investors and Issuers
      • Benchmark Administrators
      • Credit Rating Agencies
      • External Reviewers of European Green Bonds
      • Fund Management
      • Issuer Disclosure
      • Investment Services and Crowdfunding
    • Markets and Infrastructure
      • Central Counterparties
      • Data Reporting Services Providers
      • Trading
      • Consolidated Tape Providers
      • Post-trading
      • Shortening the settlement cycle to T+1 in the EU
      • Market Integrity
      • Short Selling
      • Central Securities Depositories
      • Securitisation
      • Trade Repositories
    • Risk Analysis
      • Risk Monitoring
      • Topical Analysis
      • Interactive Dashboards
    • Sustainable Finance
      • Climate benchmarks and ESG disclosure
      • CRAs and Sustainability
      • Investment Services and Fund Management
      • Sustainability Reporting
    • Digital Finance and Innovation
      • Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA)
      • DLT Pilot Regime
      • Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA)
    • Supervision and Convergence
      • Investigations and Inspections
      • Supervisory Convergence Tools
      • Sanctions and Enforcement
      • Enforcement Convergence Initiatives
      • Breach of Union Law
    • New supervisory and oversight mandates
    • Data
      • Data Reporting
      • Databases and Registers
      • Data Quality and Use
      • Statistical Information
    • Listing Act
  • News & Publications
    • News
    • Documents
    • Speeches
    • Newsletter
    • Interactive Single Rulebook
    • Guidelines, Recommendations and Technical Standards
    • Peer Reviews
    • Risk Monitoring and Analysis
    • Questions and Answers
  • Investor Corner
    • Is the firm regulated?
    • Get ready to invest
    • Frauds and Scams related to ESMA Logo and ID
    • Publications for Investors
    • Product Intervention
    • Make a complaint
    • Cost of Investment Products
  • Interact With ESMA
    • Media Corner
    • Speaking Requests
    • Stakeholder Engagement
      • Stakeholder Relations
    • Consultations
    • Events
    • Whistleblowers
  • Contact & Help
    • Contact Information
    • FAQs
    • Glossary

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. News and Publications
  3. Interactive Single Rulebook
  4. Benchmarks Regulation
  5. Article 33 Endorsement of Benchmarks Provided In a Third Country

Article 33 Endorsement of benchmarks provided in a third country

Q&A

1.  An administrator located in the Union and authorised or registered in accordance with Article 34, or any other supervised entity located in the Union with a clear and well-defined role within the control or accountability framework of a third country administrator, which is able to monitor effectively the provision of a benchmark, may apply to the relevant competent authority to endorse a benchmark or a family of benchmarks provided in a third country for their use in the Union, provided that all of the following conditions are fulfilled:

(a) the endorsing administrator or other supervised entity has verified and is able to demonstrate on an on-going basis to its competent authority that the provision of the benchmark or family of benchmarks to be endorsed fulfils, on a mandatory or on a voluntary basis, requirements which are at least as stringent as the requirements of this Regulation;

(b) the endorsing administrator or other supervised entity has the necessary expertise to monitor effectively the activity of the provision of a benchmark in a third country and to manage the associated risks;

(c) there is an objective reason to provide the benchmark or family of benchmarks in a third country and for said benchmark or family of benchmarks to be endorsed for their use in the Union.

For the purpose of point (a), when assessing whether the provision of the benchmark or family of benchmarks to be endorsed fulfils requirements which are at least as stringent as the requirements of this Regulation, the competent authority may take into account whether the compliance of the provision of the benchmark or family of benchmarks with the IOSCO principles for financial benchmarks or the IOSCO principles for PRAs, as applicable, would be equivalent to compliance with the requirements of this Regulation.

2.  An administrator or other supervised entity that makes an application for endorsement as referred to in paragraph 1 shall provide all information necessary to satisfy the competent authority that, at the time of application, all the conditions referred to in that paragraph are fulfilled.

3.  Within 90 working days of receipt of the application for endorsement referred to in paragraph 1, the relevant competent authority shall examine the application and adopt a decision either to authorise the endorsement or to refuse it. An endorsed benchmark or an endorsed family of benchmarks shall be notified by the competent authority to ESMA.

4.  An endorsed benchmark or an endorsed family of benchmarks shall be considered to be a benchmark or family of benchmarks provided by the endorsing administrator or other supervised entity. The endorsing administrator or other supervised entity shall not use the endorsement with the intention of avoiding the requirements of this Regulation.

5.  An administrator or other supervised entity that has endorsed a benchmark or a family of benchmarks provided in a third country shall remain fully responsible for such a benchmark or family of benchmarks and for compliance with the obligations under this Regulation.

6.  Where the competent authority of the endorsing administrator or other supervised entity has well-founded reasons to consider that the conditions laid down under paragraph 1 of this Article are no longer fulfilled, it shall have the power to require the endorsing administrator or other supervised entity to cease the endorsement and shall inform ESMA thereof. Article 28 shall apply in case of cessation of the endorsement.

7.  The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 49 concerning measures to determine the conditions under which the relevant competent authorities may assess whether there is an objective reason for the provision of a benchmark or family of benchmarks in a third country and their endorsement for their use in the Union. The Commission shall take into account elements such as the specificities of the underlying market or economic reality the benchmark intends to measure, the need for proximity of the provision of the benchmark to such market or economic reality, the need for proximity of the provision of the benchmark to contributors, the material availability of input data due to different time zones, and specific skills required in the provision of the benchmark.

 

Home
ESMA is an authority of the European Union Home
  • Careers
  • ESMA Documents
  • Contact & Help
  • Media Corner
  • Cookie Policy
  • Data Protection
Social Media