Search a question

May crypto-asset service providers (CASPs) designate persons or entities to provide crypto-asset services on their behalf as agents (similarly to the tied agent regime under MiFID II), where such person or entity is not an authorised CASP?

Should the financial entities covered by Article 60(2) to (6) of MiCA be entitled to apply for an authorisation to provide the crypto-asset services that are not regarded as equivalent for that type of financial entity in accordance with Article 60(2) to (6)?

To which NCA should the notification foreseen under Article 60 of MiCA be submitted?

What crypto-asset services can a credit institution provide under the notification procedure set out in Article 60 of MiCA?

Does the prohibition set out under Article 80(2) to receive "remuneration, discount or non-monetary benefit in return for routing orders received from clients" apply to the crypto-asset services of receiving and transmitting orders on behalf of clients as well as the execution of orders on behalf of clients?