ESMA_QA_1580
31/05/2017
Subject Matter
Compliance with the quoting obligations for SIs in non-equity instruments
Original question
a) Can systematic internalisers meet their quoting obligations under Article 18(1) of MiFIR for liquid instruments by providing executable quotes on a continuous basis?
b) Can client orders routed by an automated order router (AOR) system be considered as ‘prompting for a quote’ according to Article 18(1)(a) of MiFIR?
c) For how long should quotes provided by systematic internalisers be firm, or executable?
d) What are the obligations for systematic internalisers dealing in non-equity instruments for which there is no liquid market under Article 18(2) of MiFIR?
e) Which arrangements should systematic internalisers use when publishing firm quotes? Should these be the same arrangements as for equity instruments?
f) Should systematic internalisers disclose their identity when publishing firm quotes?
b) Can client orders routed by an automated order router (AOR) system be considered as ‘prompting for a quote’ according to Article 18(1)(a) of MiFIR?
c) For how long should quotes provided by systematic internalisers be firm, or executable?
d) What are the obligations for systematic internalisers dealing in non-equity instruments for which there is no liquid market under Article 18(2) of MiFIR?
e) Which arrangements should systematic internalisers use when publishing firm quotes? Should these be the same arrangements as for equity instruments?
f) Should systematic internalisers disclose their identity when publishing firm quotes?
ESMA Answer
16-10-2024
Original language
This question was deleted on 16/10/2024.
Status: Published Answer Updated
Additional Information
Level 1 Regulation
Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation (MiFIR) Regulation (EU) No 600/2014- Secondary Markets
Topic
Systematic internaliser regime