ESMA_QA_1316
05/10/2020
Subject Matter
Annex 2: Underlying Exposures - Residential Real Estate - Pari Passu Underlying Exposures RREL32
Original question
(a) How should this field be filled in if an obligor has two underlying exposure parts ranking pari passu?
(b) Does the field “Pari Passu Underlying Exposures” include any other exposures to the obligor or only other exposures relating to the property whose mortgage is included in the pool?
If for example, there were an owner-occupied mortgage in an SPV pool and the obligor had a separate buy-to-let mortgage on a different property that was not included in the SPV pool, would it be expected to include the value of both loans in this field?
(b) Does the field “Pari Passu Underlying Exposures” include any other exposures to the obligor or only other exposures relating to the property whose mortgage is included in the pool?
If for example, there were an owner-occupied mortgage in an SPV pool and the obligor had a separate buy-to-let mortgage on a different property that was not included in the SPV pool, would it be expected to include the value of both loans in this field?
ESMA Answer
05-10-2020
Original language
[ESMA 33-128-563 Securitisation Q&A, Q&A 5.4.2]
(a) This field should contain the total value of underlying exposures to this obligor ranking pari passu with this underlying exposure (regardless of whether or not they are included in this pool). If there are no balances ranking pari passu, enter 0. For example, if an obligor has two loans ranking pari passu, loan A of € 60,000 and loan B € 40,000, then the correct amount for this field would be € 100,000.
(b) This field relates to any other exposure to the obligor. Consequently, the Buy-To-Let mortgage in the example should be included in this field.
Status: Answer Published
Additional Information
Level 1 Regulation
Securitisation Regulation (EU) 2017/2402
Topic
Securitisation Disclosure Templates