Original question
Original language
[ESMA35-43-439 Investor protection Product governance According to Article 16a of MiFID II, “an investment firm shall be exempted from the requirements set out in the second to fifth subparagraphs of Article 16(3) and in Article 24(2), where the investment service it provides relates to bonds with no other embedded derivative than a make-whole clause or where the financial instruments are marketed or distributed exclusively to eligible counterparties”. This means that the mere presence of a make-whole clause is not sufficient for a financial instrument to be exempt from the MiFID II product governance requirements.
Below is a list of practical examples based on Article 16a of MiFID II.
|
Example |
Target market (type of clients category) |
Subject to MiFID II product governance requirements? |
|
Bonds without embedded derivatives (i.e. ‘plain vanilla’ bonds) |
Retail and/or professional clients |
Yes |
|
Bonds with one or more embedded derivatives without a make-whole clause |
Retail and/or professional clients |
Yes |
|
Bonds with a make-whole clause and no other embedded derivative |
Retail and/or professional clients |
No |
|
Bonds with one or more embedded derivatives AND a make-whole clause |
Retail and/or professional clients |
Yes |
|
All bonds |
Only eligible counterparties (as final clients) |
No |