2. The review and evaluation referred to in paragraph 1 shall cover all requirements on CCPs laid down in this Regulation. The CCP’s competent authority may request ESMA’s assistance in any of its supervisory activities including those listed in paragraph 1.

3. The competent authorities shall, after having considered the input of ESMA and the college referred to in Article 18, establish the frequency and depth of the review and evaluation referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, having particular regard to the size, systemic importance, nature, scale, complexity of the activities and interconnectedness with other financial market infrastructures of the CCPs concerned and to the supervisory priorities established by ESMA in accordance with Article 24a(7), first subparagraph, point (ba). The competent authorities shall update the review and evaluation at least on an annual basis.

 

CCPs shall be subject to on-site inspections by the CCP’s competent authority at least annually. The CCP’s competent authority shall inform ESMA of any planned on-site inspection one month before such inspection is due to take place, unless the decision to conduct an on-site inspection is taken in an emergency, in which case the CCP’s competent authority shall inform ESMA as soon as that decision is taken. ESMA may request to be invited to on-site inspections.

 

Where, following a request by ESMA pursuant to the second subparagraph, the CCP’s competent authority refuses to invite ESMA to an on-site inspection, it shall provide a reasoned explanation for such refusal.

 

Without prejudice to the second and third subparagraphs, the CCP’s competent authority shall forward to ESMA and the members of the college referred to in Article 18 any relevant information received from the CCP in relation to all on-site inspections it carries out.

 

4. The CCP’s competent authority shall regularly, and at least annually, submit a report to ESMA and the college referred to in Article 18 on the assessment and the results of the review and evaluation referred to in paragraph 1, including whether the CCP’s competent authority has requested any remedial action or imposed penalties.

 

The report shall cover a calendar year and shall be submitted to ESMA and the college referred to in Article 18 by 30 March of the following calendar year. That report shall be subject to an opinion of the college referred to in Article 18 pursuant to Article 19 and an opinion of ESMA pursuant to Article 24a(7), first subparagraph, point (bc), issued in accordance with the procedure set out in Article 17b.

 

ESMA may request to hold an ad hoc meeting with the CCP and its competent authority. ESMA may request such a meeting in any of the following cases:

 

(a) where there is an emergency situation under Article 24; 

(b) where ESMA has identified material concerns regarding the CCP’s compliance with the requirements of this Regulation; 

(c) where ESMA considers that the activity of the CCP could have an adverse cross-border impact on its clearing members or on their clients. 

 

The college referred to in Article 18 shall be informed that a meeting will be held and shall receive a summary of the main outcomes of that meeting.

 

4a. ESMA may require competent authorities to provide it with the necessary information to carry out its tasks pursuant to this Article in accordance with the procedure set out in Article 35 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.

 

5.  The competent authorities shall require any CCP that does not meet the requirements laid down in this Regulation to take the necessary action or steps at an early stage to address the situation.

6.  By 2 January 2021, in order to ensure consistency in the format, frequency and depth of the review carried out by the national competent authorities in accordance with this Article, ESMA shall issue guidelines in accordance with Article 16 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 to specify further, in a manner that is appropriate to the size, the structure and the internal organisation of CCPs and the nature, scope and complexity of their activities, the common procedures and methodologies for the supervisory review and evaluation process referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 and in the first subparagraph of paragraph 3 of this Article.