Search a question

ESMA_QA_2769
Topic
Market abuse in crypto-asset market
12/02/2026
Subject Matter
Personal scope of persons professionally arranging or executing transactions under MiCA
Question
What entities should be considered as Persons Professionally Arranging or Executing Transactions (PPAETs) for the obligation to prevent, detect and report market abuse or attempted market abuse under Article 92(1) of MiCA?
Level 1 Regulation
MiCA
ESMA_QA_2754
Topic
Notifications of major shareholdings
22/01/2026
Subject Matter
Major holdings notification – definition of indirect holding
Question
The question refers to the interpretation of the meaning of indirect holdings of other financial instruments (Article 13) for the purpose of aggregated notification (Article 13a).
National Competent Authorities request that the European Commission clarify the meaning of ‘indirect holding’ in the context of financial instruments other than shares (i.e., securities providing voting rights).
The TD explicitly specifies, under Article 10, the different cases of indirect holdings of voting rights that are subject to notification.
In the case of financial instruments not granting voting rights (Article 13 and its reference in Article 13a) there is, however, no explicit definition of those cases of indirect holdings; and no explicit link to Article 10.
National Competent Authorities have raised questions about the precise definition of indirect holdings in this context—specifically, whether a full “look‑through” approach must always be applied, or whether the limitation to the look‑through approach set out in paragraph 10(e) also applies to financial instruments. In particular, it is unclear whether financial instruments held by a third party in its own name but on behalf of the person or entity concerned—such as those described in paragraph 10(g)—should be excluded.
Level 1 Regulation
Transparency Directive (TD) Directive 2004/109/EC
ESMA_QA_2753
Topic
Public offer
21/01/2026
Subject Matter
Prospectus exemption
Question
Is a prospectus required under Article 1(5)(ba) of the Prospectus Regulation (PR) for reverse acquisitions?

Unlike Article 1(6b) of the PR, which requires a prospectus for reverse acquisitions within the meaning of paragraph B19 of IFRS 3, Business Combinations, Article 1(5)(ba) of the PR does not explicitly address this issue.
Level 1 Regulation
Prospectus Regulation 2017/1129
ESMA_QA_2747
Topic
Control functions (Compliance, Risk and Audit)
05/01/2026
Subject Matter
Due diligence
Question
How should the due diligence requirements set out in Article 5(2) of the ESCPR be applied by CSPs?
Level 1 Regulation
Regulation 2020/1503 - European crowdfunding service providers for business
ESMA_QA_2742
Topic
Public offer
19/12/2025
Subject Matter
Prospectus QA exemption
Question
Do subscription rights fall under the exemptions in Article 1(5)(a) and (ba) of the Prospectus Regulation?
Level 1 Regulation
Prospectus Regulation 2017/1129