Consultation Paper on the review of the methodology included in the Guidelines on stress test scenarios under the MMF Regulation

From
to
Read responses
Section
Fund Management
Details

ESMA invites comments on all matters in this paper and in particular on the specific questions summarised in Annex 1. Comments are most helpful if they:

  • respond to the question stated;
  • indicate the specific question to which the comment relates;
  • contain a clear rationale; and
  • describe any alternatives ESMA should consider.

ESMA will consider all comments received by 28 April. All contributions should be submitted using the response form below.

Publication of responses

All contributions received will be published following the close of the consultation, unless you request otherwise. Please clearly and prominently indicate in your submission any part you do not wish to be publicly disclosed. A standard confidentiality statement in an email message will not be treated as a request for non-disclosure. A confidential response may be requested from us in accordance with ESMA’s rules on access to documents. We may consult you if we receive such a request. Any decision we make not to disclose the response is reviewable by ESMA’s Board of Appeal and the European Ombudsman.

Information on data protection can be found here.

Who should read this paper?

This document will be of interest to (i) MMF managers and their trade associations, (ii) alternative investment funds and UCITS managers and their trade associations, as well as (iii) institutional and retail investors (and associations of such investors) investing in MMF.

Activity Institution Download
Asset Management Institutional Money Market Funds Association
  • 201269
Asset Management AFG - ASSOCIATION FRANCAISE DE LA GESTION FINANCIERE
  • 201274
Others ALFI – Association of the Luxembourg Fund Industry
  • 201279
Asset Management European Fund and Asset Management Association (EFAMA)
  • 201282
Asset Management BVI
  • 201283