Search a question

What happens to an entity providing crypto-asset services in accordance with applicable law before 30 December 2024 that has not applied for authorisation as a CASP, or whose application for authorisation as a CASP has been refused by the end of the transition period?

Where an entity providing crypto-asset services in accordance with applicable law before 30 December 2024 has applied for but has not been granted or refused authorisation by the end of the transition period, can this entity continue providing services until it is granted or refused authorisation?

Where should a CASP exchanging crypto-assets for funds or other crypto-assets publish the “firm price or method of determining the price of the crypto-assets" as required by Article 77(2) of MiCA?

Where should they publish the “information about the transactions concluded by them, such as transaction volumes and prices”, as required by Article 77(4) of MiCA?

May crypto-asset service providers (CASPs) designate persons or entities to provide crypto-asset services on their behalf as agents (similarly to the tied agent regime under MiFID II), where such person or entity is not an authorised CASP?

Can financial entities covered by Article 60(2) to (6) of MiCA apply for an authorization under Article 62 MiCA to provide the crypto-asset services that are not regarded as equivalent for that type of financial entity in accordance with Article 60(2) to (6)?