ESMA LIBRARY

The ESMA Library contains all ESMA documents. Please use the search and filter options to find specific documents.
913
DOCUMENTS

REFINE YOUR SEARCH

Sections

Type of document

Your filters
MiFID - Investor Protection X European Single Electronic Format X Warnings and publications for investors X Credit Rating Agencies X Press Releases X
Reset all filters
Date Ref. Title Section Type Download Info Summary Related Documents Translated versions
25/01/2013 2012/682 HU Befektetési útmutató Reference PDF
795.26 KB
Befektetési útmutató
25/01/2013 2012/682 NL Beleggersgids Reference PDF
689.11 KB
Beleggersgids
01/10/2013 2013/606 NL Beloningsbeleid en beloningspraktijken (MiFID) , Guidelines & Recommendations PDF
319.71 KB
17/04/2020 ESMA71-99-1313 Benchmarks MoU- 30 Mar (MAS ESMA) , , Press Release PDF
112.32 KB
25/02/2015 2015/494 Best Execution under MiFID , Final Report PDF
761.62 KB
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has conducted a peer review on how national regulators (national competent authorities or NCAs) supervise and enforce the MiFID provisions relating to investment firms’ obligation to provide best execution, or obtain the best possible result, for their clients when executing their orders. ESMA found that the level of implementation of best execution provisions, as well as the level of convergence of supervisory practices by NCAs, is relatively low. In order to address this situation a number of improvements were identified, including: • prioritisation of best execution as a key conduct of business supervisory issue; • the allocation of sufficient resources to best execution supervision; and • a more proactive supervisory approach to monitoring compliance with best execution requirements, both desk-based and onsite inspections. The review was conducted on the basis of information provided by 29 NCAs and complemented by on-site visits to the NCAs of France, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Malta, Poland and Spain.
27/03/2019 ESMA35-43-1862 BO Renewal Decision 3 Notice Reference PDF
83.42 KB
bgendadeelenenhrhuitenlvmtplroslsvnlptfiskes
21/07/2016 2016/1131 BoS Decision on Fitch Ratings Limited 21 July 2016 , Decision PDF
108.21 KB
23/07/2018 ESMA41-137-1153 BoS decision- CRA 2-2017- SEB Decision PDF
706.81 KB
23/07/2018 ESMA41-137-1145 BoS decision-CRA 2-2017- Danske Decision PDF
635.85 KB
23/07/2018 ESMA41-137-1150 BoS decision-CRA 2-2017- Nordea Decision PDF
714.78 KB
23/07/2018 ESMA41-137-1147 BoS decision-CRA 2-2017- Svenska Handelsbanken AB Decision PDF
690.73 KB
23/07/2018 ESMA41-137-1152 BoS decision-CRA 2-2017- Swedbank Decision PDF
715.12 KB
19/12/2018 ESMA35-43-1328 Brexit Statement- information to clients , Statement PDF
212.95 KB
28/03/2019 ESMA90-1-83 Brexit Update March 2019 , , , , , Statement PDF
121.13 KB
18/12/2017 ESMA 71-99-671 Briefing note- Preparing for 2020: ESEF field tests and reporting manual Reference PDF
339.06 KB
03/02/2015 2015/233 Call for Evidence Competition, Choice and Conflicts of Interests in the CRA Industry Consultation Paper PDF
402.12 KB
17/07/2019 ESMA35-43-1905 Call for evidence Impact of the inducements and costs and charges disclosure requirements under MiFID II Consultation Paper PDF
479.41 KB
30/03/2020 ESMA33-5-829 Call for evidence on access and use of ratings Consultation Paper PDF
307.88 KB
30/09/2019 ESMA-35-43-2090 Call for evidence on MiFID II product intervention powers Consultation Paper PDF
197.51 KB
20/03/2015 2015/558 Call for evidence on private and bilateral SFIs Consultation Paper PDF
118.4 KB
This call for evidence should be read by all those involved in the EU securitisation markets. It is particularly targeted at the following market participants and the groups and trade associations who represent them: •    Issuers, originators and sponsors of Structured Finance Instruments (SFIs);•    Investors acting in the securitisation markets;•    Market intermediaries other than the issuers, originators and sponsors of SFIs.Responses are most helpful to ESMA when they clearly indicate which question is being answered and provide evidence in support of the response, such as concrete examples of practices experienced, data or costs estimates. Should respondents feel that the distinction provided for by the two proposed categories (issuers vs. investors) is not suitable to their particular situation, ESMA welcomes these contributions in alternative format. ESMA will consider all responses that have been received by 20 May 2015. All contributions should be submitted online at www.esma.europa.eu under the heading ‘Your input - Consultations’.