ESMA LIBRARY

The ESMA Library contains all ESMA documents. Please use the search and filter options to find specific documents.
821
DOCUMENTS

REFINE YOUR SEARCH

Sections

Type of document

Your filters
MiFID - Investor Protection X MiFID - Secondary Markets X Short Selling X Joint Committee X Sustainable finance X
Reset all filters
Date Ref. Title Section Type Download Info Summary Related Documents Translated versions
04/07/2016 2016/1068 APPLICATION FORM Application form for SMSC CWG Reference DOCX
35.75 KB
17/07/2018 ESMA70-154-651 Application form- SMSC CWG Renewal 2018 Vacancy DOCX
37.81 KB
07/02/2014 2014/154 LV Ar ieguldījumiem sarežģītos produktos saistītie riski , Investor Warning PDF
435.59 KB
25/08/2014 JC/2014/43 fi Arvopaperialaa (ESMA) ja pankkialaa (EPV) koskevat ohjeet valitusten käsittelystä , Guidelines & Recommendations PDF
150.96 KB
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) and the European Banking Authority (EBA) published today their Joint Committee final Report on guidelines for handling consumer complaints in the securities and banking sectors. The document aims to increase market confidence and for the benefit of consumers and firms alike it will ensure a harmonised approach to handling complaints for all 28 EU Member States and across all financial services sectors.The final report published today is part of the efforts of the European Supervisory Authorities to bring further supervisory convergence across the securities and banking sectors. It was developed on the basis of the existing complaints-handling guidelines established by EIOPA (the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority) for the insurance sector. The report was launched for a public consultation last year and this final version takes into consideration the feedback received.ESMA and the EBA consider that these guidelines will ensure a consistent approach to complaints-handling across the EU. Consumers can purchase financial services and products in the investment, banking and insurance sectors across the entire EU Single Market and these guidelines will allow them to refer to a single set of complaints-handling arrangements. EU consumers will therefore be able to rely on the same approach irrespective of what type of product they have purchased and where they have purchased it.In addition to strengthening consumer protection -a key statutory objective for ESMA and for the EBA-, the guidelines will also allow firms, some of which sell products from more than one sector across the EU, to streamline and standardise their own complaints-handling arrangements. National regulators too will be able to supervise the same harmonised requirements across all sectors of financial services in their own jurisdictions.The guidelines will be translated into the official languages of the European Union (EU) and they will become applicable two months after the date of publication of their translations.
02/04/2013 2013/74 LV Atbrīvojums tirgus uzturētāja darbībām un primārā tirgus operācijām saskaņā ar Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes Regulu (ES) Nr. 236/2012 par īso pārdošanu un dažiem kredītriska mijmaiņas darījumu aspektiem , Guidelines & Recommendations PDF
771.14 KB
01/10/2013 2013/606 LT Atlyginimų nustatymo politika ir praktika (FPRD) , Guidelines & Recommendations PDF
268.28 KB
01/10/2013 2013/606 LV Atlīdzības politika un prakse (FITD) , Guidelines & Recommendations PDF
339.96 KB
02/04/2013 2013/74 DE Ausnahme für Market-Making-Tätigkeiten und Primärmarkttätigkeiten gemäß der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 236/2012 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates über Leerverkäufe und bestimmte Aspekte von Credit Default Swaps , Guidelines & Recommendations PDF
638.62 KB
07/02/2014 2014/154 HU Az összetett termékekbe történő befektetések kockázatai , Investor Warning PDF
384.08 KB
19/11/2019 ESMA71-319-154 Banking and the MiFID II review , , Speech PDF
135.75 KB
30/04/2019 ESMA70-155-3655 Belgian Power Physical Base position limit opinion Opinion PDF
261.43 KB
01/10/2013 2013/606 NL Beloningsbeleid en beloningspraktijken (MiFID) , Guidelines & Recommendations PDF
319.71 KB
22/12/2014 JC/GL/2014/01 LT Bendrosiosgairės dėl priežiūros praktikos, kuri susijusi su finansinių konglomeratų priežiūros veiklos koordinavimo tvarkos suderinimu, konvergencijos , Guidelines & Recommendations PDF
227.31 KB
25/02/2015 2015/494 Best Execution under MiFID , Final Report PDF
761.62 KB
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has conducted a peer review on how national regulators (national competent authorities or NCAs) supervise and enforce the MiFID provisions relating to investment firms’ obligation to provide best execution, or obtain the best possible result, for their clients when executing their orders. ESMA found that the level of implementation of best execution provisions, as well as the level of convergence of supervisory practices by NCAs, is relatively low. In order to address this situation a number of improvements were identified, including: • prioritisation of best execution as a key conduct of business supervisory issue; • the allocation of sufficient resources to best execution supervision; and • a more proactive supervisory approach to monitoring compliance with best execution requirements, both desk-based and onsite inspections. The review was conducted on the basis of information provided by 29 NCAs and complemented by on-site visits to the NCAs of France, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Malta, Poland and Spain.
22/12/2014 JC/GL/2014/01/NL Bijlage I: Model voor het in kaart brengen (mapping) van het financiële conglomeraat (JC 2014 07 , Guidelines & Recommendations XLSX
67.95 KB
22/12/2014 JC/GL/2014/01/DA Bilag I: Skema til brug for kortlægningen af det finansielle konglomerat (JC 2014 070 Bilag) , Guidelines & Recommendations XLS
93.5 KB
22/12/2014 JC/GL/2014/01/SV Bilaga I: Mall för kartläggningsprocessen för det finansiella konglomeratet (JC 2014 070 , Guidelines & Recommendations XLSX
62.26 KB
27/03/2019 ESMA35-43-1862 BO Renewal Decision 3 Notice Reference PDF
83.42 KB
bgendadeelenenhrhuitenlvmtplroslsvnlptfiskes
24/06/2013 BoA 2013-008 Board of Appeal Decision , Decision PDF
242.72 KB
The joint Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities (EBA, ESMA and EIOPA) has published today its decision in an appeal brought by an Estonian company against a decision of the EBA. It concerned the question whether the suitability of the managers of a significant branch of a bank may be a matter within EU law, and not just national law. Allowing the appeal, the Board of Appeal interpreted Directive No. 2006/48/EC consistently with the EBA Guidelines on the assessment of the suitability of members of the management body and key function holders. It came to the conclusion that the “fit and proper” requirement is not restricted to the persons who direct the business of the credit institution. The matter therefore was within the EBA’s powers of investigation. Although the appellant criticised the way in which the EBA dealt with its complaint, the Board of Appeal made it clear that it did not accept that criticism. It considered that the EBA dealt with the complaint in an appropriate manner. The ground on which the appeal was allowed was one of interpretation of the applicable legal provisions. The case was remitted to the EBA to adopt the appropriate decision in accordance with the Board of Appeal’s findings. This is for information only. The decision consists of the signed Decision only. For any enquiries, please contact EIOPA’s Press Office: Anzhelika Mayer Tel.: +49 69 9511 1968
17/07/2014 2014/C1/02 Board of Appeal Decision , Decision PDF
368.94 KB
The Joint Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities (the European Banking Authority, the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority and the European Securities and Markets Authority) published its decision in an appeal brought by SV Capital OÜ, an Estonian company, against a decision of the EBA. This was the second appeal to be considered by the Board of Appeal in this matter between the same parties concerning the question whether the suitability of the managers of a significant branch of a bank raised a question of Union law. Following the Board of Appeal’s affirmative decision of 24 June 2013, the appellant requested the EBA to initiate an investigation against the Estonian and Finnish Financial Supervision Authorities because their alleged failure to take action in respect of individuals in the Estonian branch of Nordea Bank Finland PLC whom it was alleged were not fit and proper persons to be key function holders in the bank. The EBA decided that it would not initiate an investigation.  The Board of Appeal decided that the EBA had been right to raise the matter with the national supervisors, but that having done so, it was entitled to take no further action in the light of their responses. The Board accordingly dismissed the appellant’s appeal against the EBA’s decision.