ESMA LIBRARY
The ESMA Library contains all ESMA documents. Please use the search and filter options to find specific documents.
56
REFINE YOUR SEARCH
Sections
- (-) Remove Trade Repositories filter Trade Repositories
- (-) Remove Board of Appeal filter Board of Appeal
- CESR Archive (1055) Apply CESR Archive filter
- Guidelines and Technical standards (603) Apply Guidelines and Technical standards filter
- Post Trading (358) Apply Post Trading filter
- Fund Management (336) Apply Fund Management filter
- Corporate Disclosure (323) Apply Corporate Disclosure filter
- Press Releases (321) Apply Press Releases filter
- MiFID - Secondary Markets (319) Apply MiFID - Secondary Markets filter
- MiFID - Investor Protection (318) Apply MiFID - Investor Protection filter
- Credit Rating Agencies (240) Apply Credit Rating Agencies filter
- Corporate Information (229) Apply Corporate Information filter
- Joint Committee (228) Apply Joint Committee filter
- Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group (194) Apply Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group filter
- Board of Supervisors (181) Apply Board of Supervisors filter
- Speeches (149) Apply Speeches filter
- Warnings and publications for investors (141) Apply Warnings and publications for investors filter
- Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors (139) Apply Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors filter
- Management Board (114) Apply Management Board filter
- Supervisory convergence (111) Apply Supervisory convergence filter
- IFRS Supervisory Convergence (106) Apply IFRS Supervisory Convergence filter
- Market Integrity (100) Apply Market Integrity filter
- Short Selling (97) Apply Short Selling filter
- IAS Regulation (82) Apply IAS Regulation filter
- Procurement (81) Apply Procurement filter
- Market Abuse (79) Apply Market Abuse filter
- Innovation and Products (75) Apply Innovation and Products filter
- Prospectus (71) Apply Prospectus filter
- Planning reporting budget (61) Apply Planning reporting budget filter
- Benchmarks (60) Apply Benchmarks filter
- Brexit (57) Apply Brexit filter
- Securitisation (55) Apply Securitisation filter
- International cooperation (48) Apply International cooperation filter
- COVID-19 (47) Apply COVID-19 filter
- Sustainable finance (34) Apply Sustainable finance filter
- Corporate Finance (31) Apply Corporate Finance filter
- European Single Electronic Format (31) Apply European Single Electronic Format filter
- Transparency (31) Apply Transparency filter
- Trading (30) Apply Trading filter
- Securities Financing Transactions (22) Apply Securities Financing Transactions filter
- Audit (20) Apply Audit filter
- CCP Directorate (18) Apply CCP Directorate filter
- Corporate Governance (18) Apply Corporate Governance filter
- Careers (14) Apply Careers filter
- MiFID II: Transparency Calculations and DVC (12) Apply MiFID II: Transparency Calculations and DVC filter
- ITMG (4) Apply ITMG filter
- Crowdfunding (3) Apply Crowdfunding filter
- Vacancies (3) Apply Vacancies filter
Type of document
- Decision (17) Apply Decision filter
- Press Release (12) Apply Press Release filter
- Reference (12) Apply Reference filter
- Statement (5) Apply Statement filter
- Report (4) Apply Report filter
- Consultation Paper (2) Apply Consultation Paper filter
- Q&A (2) Apply Q&A filter
- Annual Report (1) Apply Annual Report filter
- Final Report (1) Apply Final Report filter
Your filters Reset all filters
Date | Ref. | Title | Section | Type | Download | Info | Summary | Related Documents | Translated versions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
27/02/2019 | BoA D 2019 01, 02, 03 and 04 | Appeal by Svenska Handelsbanken AB, Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB, Swedbank A and Nordea Bank Abp against the European Securities and Markets Authority | Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 829.04 KB |
||||
26/01/2016 | BOA 2016 001 | BoA 2016- 001 (Decision Kluge v EBA) | Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 196.32 KB |
||||
08/10/2019 | boa-2019-d-05_decision | BOA decision creditreform_rating_ag_vs_eba | Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 922.78 KB |
||||
30/11/2018 | boa30.18 | BoA Decision SEB appeal 30 November 2018 | Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 416.77 KB |
||||
18/04/2018 | ESMA71-99-969 | Board of Appeal Appointments 2018 | Board of Appeal | Press Release | PDF 292.64 KB |
||||
24/06/2013 | BoA 2013-008 | Board of Appeal Decision | Joint Committee, Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 242.72 KB |
The joint Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities (EBA, ESMA and EIOPA) has published today its decision in an appeal brought by an Estonian company against a decision of the EBA. It concerned the question whether the suitability of the managers of a significant branch of a bank may be a matter within EU law, and not just national law. Allowing the appeal, the Board of Appeal interpreted Directive No. 2006/48/EC consistently with the EBA Guidelines on the assessment of the suitability of members of the management body and key function holders. It came to the conclusion that the “fit and proper” requirement is not restricted to the persons who direct the business of the credit institution. The matter therefore was within the EBA’s powers of investigation. Although the appellant criticised the way in which the EBA dealt with its complaint, the Board of Appeal made it clear that it did not accept that criticism. It considered that the EBA dealt with the complaint in an appropriate manner. The ground on which the appeal was allowed was one of interpretation of the applicable legal provisions. The case was remitted to the EBA to adopt the appropriate decision in accordance with the Board of Appeal’s findings. This is for information only. The decision consists of the signed Decision only. For any enquiries, please contact EIOPA’s Press Office: Anzhelika Mayer Tel.: +49 69 9511 1968 | |||
17/07/2014 | 2014/C1/02 | Board of Appeal Decision | Joint Committee, Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 368.94 KB |
The Joint Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities (the European Banking Authority, the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority and the European Securities and Markets Authority) published its decision in an appeal brought by SV Capital OÜ, an Estonian company, against a decision of the EBA. This was the second appeal to be considered by the Board of Appeal in this matter between the same parties concerning the question whether the suitability of the managers of a significant branch of a bank raised a question of Union law. Following the Board of Appeal’s affirmative decision of 24 June 2013, the appellant requested the EBA to initiate an investigation against the Estonian and Finnish Financial Supervision Authorities because their alleged failure to take action in respect of individuals in the Estonian branch of Nordea Bank Finland PLC whom it was alleged were not fit and proper persons to be key function holders in the bank. The EBA decided that it would not initiate an investigation. The Board of Appeal decided that the EBA had been right to raise the matter with the national supervisors, but that having done so, it was entitled to take no further action in the light of their responses. The Board accordingly dismissed the appellant’s appeal against the EBA’s decision. | |||
13/01/2014 | BoA 2013-014 | Board of Appeal Decision Global Private Rating Company v. ESMA | Joint Committee, Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 361.96 KB |
Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities dismisses appeal made by a refused CRA-applicant against ESMA On 10 January 2014, the Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities handed down its decision on an appeal by the appellant, Global Private Rating Company “Standard Rating” Ltd, against the refusal by the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) to register it as a credit rating agency. This is the first appeal against a decision by ESMA refusing an applicant registration as a credit rating agency. The Board of Appeal unanimously decided that the appeal should be dismissed, and that ESMA’s refusal decision should be confirmed. It stated that it accepted the appellant’s point that the registration of a credit rating agency by ESMA is a new process, and recognised that the procedures will to an extent take time fully to work out. Nevertheless, because of the responsibilities placed on credit rating agencies and their importance in the financial system generally, it considered that the onus must be on an applicant to satisfy ESMA that the relevant requirements are met. The application and its contents must be very clear, and it is not ESMA’s responsibility as regulator to remedy deficiencies. | |||
04/11/2020 | BoA D 2020 02 | Board of Appeal of the ESAs- Decision on Howerton vs EIOPA | Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 85.83 KB |
||||
12/10/2020 | BoA D 2020 01 | Board of Appeal of the ESAs- Decision on Howerton vs ESMA | Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 616.54 KB |
||||
15/01/2021 | BoA D 2021 01 | Board of Appeal of the ESAs- Decision on Howeverton vs EBA | Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 540.91 KB |
||||
13/03/2019 | BoA PR 01 | Board of Appeal PR- Shadow Ratings Appeals | Board of Appeal | Press Release | PDF 399.67 KB |
||||
28/03/2019 | ESMA90-1-83 | Brexit Update March 2019 | Brexit, Credit Rating Agencies, MiFID - Secondary Markets, MiFID II: Transparency Calculations and DVC, Post Trading, Trade Repositories | Statement | PDF 121.13 KB |
||||
04/01/2021 | ESMA71-99-1498 | Brexit: ESMA withdraws the registrations of six UK-based credit rating agencies and four trade repositories | Brexit, Credit Rating Agencies, Press Releases, Trade Repositories | Press Release | PDF 94.63 KB |
||||
27/03/2020 | ESMA74-362-47 | CP on the TS on reporting data quality data access and registration of TRs under EMIR REFIT | Post Trading, Supervisory convergence, Trade Repositories | Consultation Paper | PDF 2.66 MB |
||||
20/12/2019 | ESMA71-100-1792 | CRAs and TRs Follow Up Fees Factsheet | Credit Rating Agencies, Supervisory convergence, Trade Repositories | Reference | PDF 122.09 KB |
||||
02/12/2014 | 2014/BOA/05 | Decision by the ESA BoA concerning Investor Protection Europe sprl | Joint Committee, Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 229.85 KB |
The Joint Board of Appeal of the ESAs decides on the inadmissibility of an appeal brought by IPE sprl, a company based in Brussels, against a decision by ESMAThe Joint Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities published today its decision in an appeal brought by Investor Protection Europe (IPE) sprl, a company based in Brussels, against a decision of the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) of 10 June 2014 not to initiate an investigation under Article 17 of the ESMA Regulation regarding an alleged breach of Union law by the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier of Luxembourg. The Board of Appeal unanimously decided that the appeal was inadmissible, and in the light of that decision, did not consider the substance of IPE’s complaint. | |||
30/04/2018 | BoA 2018-01 | Decision in an appeal by A v ESMA | Board of Appeal, Joint Committee | Decision | PDF 392.62 KB |
||||
26/09/2018 | BoA D 2018 02 | Decision in an Appeal by B. against a decision of the European Securities and Markets Authority | Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 382.53 KB |
||||
14/08/2015 | BOA/2015/001 | Decision of the Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities given under Article 60 of Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010 and the Board of Appeal’s Rules of Procedure (BOA 2012 002) | Joint Committee, Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 147.78 KB |