ESMA LIBRARY
REFINE YOUR SEARCH
Sections
- (-) Remove Board of Appeal filter Board of Appeal
- (-) Remove Trade Repositories filter Trade Repositories
- Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group (93) Apply Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group filter
- Credit Rating Agencies (23) Apply Credit Rating Agencies filter
- Board of Supervisors (16) Apply Board of Supervisors filter
- Management Board (12) Apply Management Board filter
- Joint Committee (9) Apply Joint Committee filter
- Short Selling (8) Apply Short Selling filter
- Corporate Information (7) Apply Corporate Information filter
- Market Integrity (6) Apply Market Integrity filter
- COVID-19 (5) Apply COVID-19 filter
- MiFID - Investor Protection (5) Apply MiFID - Investor Protection filter
- MiFID - Secondary Markets (5) Apply MiFID - Secondary Markets filter
- Sustainable finance (4) Apply Sustainable finance filter
- Careers (2) Apply Careers filter
- Vacancies (2) Apply Vacancies filter
- European Single Electronic Format (1) Apply European Single Electronic Format filter
- Fund Management (1) Apply Fund Management filter
- Press Releases (1) Apply Press Releases filter
- Procurement (1) Apply Procurement filter
- Supervisory convergence (1) Apply Supervisory convergence filter
- Trading (1) Apply Trading filter
Type of document
- (-) Remove Decision filter Decision
- Letter (264) Apply Letter filter
- Reference (155) Apply Reference filter
- Final Report (80) Apply Final Report filter
- Consultation Paper (74) Apply Consultation Paper filter
- Press Release (73) Apply Press Release filter
- Statement (67) Apply Statement filter
- Report (47) Apply Report filter
- Opinion (21) Apply Opinion filter
- Guidelines & Recommendations (20) Apply Guidelines & Recommendations filter
- Technical Advice (19) Apply Technical Advice filter
- Speech (18) Apply Speech filter
- Q&A (11) Apply Q&A filter
- Technical Standards (11) Apply Technical Standards filter
- Compliance table (10) Apply Compliance table filter
- CESR Document (3) Apply CESR Document filter
- Annual Report (2) Apply Annual Report filter
Date | Ref. | Title | Section | Type | Download | Info | Summary | Related Documents | Translated versions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
22/07/2022 | BoA-D-2022-01 | Board of Appeal of the ESAs- Decision on C vs EBA | Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 790.75 KB |
||||
24/03/2022 | ESMA41-356-271 | Decision of the Board of Supervisors to adopt supervisory measures and impose fines in respect of infringements committed by REGIS-TR, S.A | Board of Supervisors, Trade Repositories | Decision | PDF 1.17 MB |
||||
23/09/2021 | ESMA41-356-233 | Decision- UnaVista Limited | Trade Repositories | Decision | PDF 996.23 KB |
||||
12/07/2021 | ESMA41-356-187 | Decision- DTCC Derivatives Repository | Board of Supervisors, Trade Repositories | Decision | PDF 1.13 MB |
||||
03/05/2021 | BoA D 2021 03 | Board of Appeal of the ESAs- decision on City Insurance SA vs EIOPA | Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 305.13 KB |
||||
29/03/2021 | Decision BoA D 2021 02 | Board of Appeal of the ESAs- decision on "A" vs ESMA | Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 283 KB |
||||
15/01/2021 | BoA D 2021 01 | Board of Appeal of the ESAs- Decision on Howeverton vs EBA | Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 540.91 KB |
||||
11/01/2021 | BoA D 2020 03 | ESAs BoA Decision on Scope Ratings v ESMA | Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 437.6 KB |
||||
04/11/2020 | BoA D 2020 02 | Board of Appeal of the ESAs- Decision on Howerton vs EIOPA | Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 85.83 KB |
||||
12/10/2020 | BoA D 2020 01 | Board of Appeal of the ESAs- Decision on Howerton vs ESMA | Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 616.54 KB |
||||
08/10/2019 | boa-2019-d-05_decision | BOA decision creditreform_rating_ag_vs_eba | Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 922.78 KB |
||||
27/02/2019 | BoA D 2019 01, 02, 03 and 04 | Appeal by Svenska Handelsbanken AB, Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB, Swedbank A and Nordea Bank Abp against the European Securities and Markets Authority | Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 829.04 KB |
||||
30/11/2018 | boa30.18 | BoA Decision SEB appeal 30 November 2018 | Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 416.77 KB |
||||
26/09/2018 | BoA D 2018 02 | Decision in an Appeal by B. against a decision of the European Securities and Markets Authority | Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 382.53 KB |
||||
30/04/2018 | BoA 2018-01 | Decision in an appeal by A v ESMA | Board of Appeal, Joint Committee | Decision | PDF 392.62 KB |
||||
20/07/2017 | BoA 2017 01 | FinancialCraft Analytics Sp. z o.o. vs ESMA BoA Decision | Board of Appeal, Credit Rating Agencies | Decision | PDF 693 KB |
||||
31/03/2016 | 2016/408 | Decision to adopt a supervisory measure taking the form of a public notice and to impose a fine in accordance with Statement of Findings in accordance with Articles 64(5), 65, 67 and 73 of Regulation (EC) No 648/2012 EMIR | Trade Repositories | Decision | PDF 62.47 KB |
Decision to adopt a supervisory measure taking the form of a public notice and to impose a fine in accordance with Statement of Findings in accordance with Articles 64(5), 65, 67 and 73 of Regulation (EC) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories Public notice regarding negligent breach by DTCC Derivatives Repository Ltd of its legal obligation to ensure immediate access for regulators to data reported under EMIR DTCC Derivatives Repository Ltd (‘DDRL’) is a trade repository registered in the European Union and is part of the DTCC group which includes a number of companies providing post-trading services to the global financial services industry. DDRL was registered by ESMA as a trade repository under Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories (‘EMIR’) on 7 November 2013. ESMA has responsibilities for the supervision and enforcement of provisions under EMIR concerning DDRL and other trade repositories registered in the EU. In May 2014, ESMA’s supervisory team became aware of delays in providing regulators with access to data reported to DDRL under EMIR. Following further examination, the supervisory team formed the view that there were serious indications of the possible existence of facts liable to constitute one or more of the infringements listed in EMIR. The matter was accordingly referred to an independent investigation officer (the ‘IIO’). The IIO considered the evidence referred to him and conducted further investigations, before submitting his findings to ESMA’s Board of Supervisors (the ‘ESMA Board’). Based on the findings of the IIO and the evidence put before it, the ESMA Board found on 23 March 2016 that an examination of the facts showed that DDRL had committed the following infringement under EMIR and had done so negligently. DDRL committed an infringement of EMIR by not allowing regulators and supervisors direct and immediate access to the details of derivatives contracts they need to fulfil their responsibilities and mandates. |
|||
26/01/2016 | BOA 2016 001 | BoA 2016- 001 (Decision Kluge v EBA) | Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 196.32 KB |
||||
14/08/2015 | BOA/2015/001 | Decision of the Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities given under Article 60 of Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010 and the Board of Appeal’s Rules of Procedure (BOA 2012 002) | Joint Committee, Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 147.78 KB |
||||
02/12/2014 | 2014/BOA/05 | Decision by the ESA BoA concerning Investor Protection Europe sprl | Joint Committee, Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 229.85 KB |
The Joint Board of Appeal of the ESAs decides on the inadmissibility of an appeal brought by IPE sprl, a company based in Brussels, against a decision by ESMAThe Joint Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities published today its decision in an appeal brought by Investor Protection Europe (IPE) sprl, a company based in Brussels, against a decision of the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) of 10 June 2014 not to initiate an investigation under Article 17 of the ESMA Regulation regarding an alleged breach of Union law by the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier of Luxembourg. The Board of Appeal unanimously decided that the appeal was inadmissible, and in the light of that decision, did not consider the substance of IPE’s complaint. |