ESMA LIBRARY

The ESMA Library contains all ESMA documents. Please use the search and filter options to find specific documents.
162
DOCUMENTS

REFINE YOUR SEARCH

Sections

Type of document

Your filters
CESR Document X Decision X
Reset all filters

Pages

Date Ref. Title Section Type Download Info Summary Related Documents Translated versions
09/04/2002 01-014d A European Regime of Investor Protection – The Harmonisation of Conduct of Business Rules CESR Document PDF
133.19 KB
This set of Standards and Rules provides harmonised core conduct of business rules for retail investors in the following areas: Standards and Rules of general application, information to be provided to customers, the "know your customer" standards and the duty of care, customers agreements, dealing requirements (including the "best execution" standards) and individual discretionary portfolio management. The profesional and counterparty regime, including the categorisation of investors paper, requires further work by CESR.
08/07/2002 02-098b A European Regime of Investor Protection – The Professional and Counterparty Regimes CESR Document PDF
63.43 KB
This paper completes the work conducted by CESR on the harmonization of conduct of business rules under the existing Article 11 of the Investment Services Directive. It complements the document (CESR/01-014d) adopted in April 2002 on the so called "retail regime", i.e. the regime applicable to investment services provided to non-professional customers. The paper builds on the proposal for the "Categorisation of investors for the purpose of conduct of business rules". The paper contains: I) core conduct of business rules which should apply to investment services between investment firms and professionals and II) core standards for "counterparty relationships".
06/05/2003 03-129 Additional Draft Feedback Statement on Level 2 Implementing measures for the proposed Prospectus Directive CESR Document PDF
131.89 KB
On Monday 31st March 2003, the European Commission, considering that the European Parliament has not started the second reading on the prospectus proposal, has invited CESR to provide its technical advice on issues initially required for 31st March by July 31st 2003. CESR welcomes this extension and has decided to hold an additional open hearing that will take place at CESR
25/04/2003 03-067b Additional Public Hearing on possible implementing measures of the Prospectus Directive: Draft Feedback Statement CESR Document PDF
220.18 KB
On Monday 31st March 2003, the European Commission, considering that the European Parliament has not started the second reading on the prospectus proposal, has invited CESR to provide its technical advice on issues initially required for 31st March by July 31st 2003. CESR welcomes this extension and has decided to hold an additional open hearing that will take place at CESR
15/07/2019 esma41-139-1231 Amended decision Handelsbanken Decision PDF
244.4 KB
15/07/2019 esma41-139-1224 Amended_decision_nordea Decision PDF
236.05 KB
15/07/2019 esma41-139-1229 Amended_decision_seb Decision PDF
239.8 KB
15/07/2019 esma41-139-1230 Amended_decision_swedbank Decision PDF
243.03 KB
27/02/2019 BoA D 2019 01, 02, 03 and 04 Appeal by Svenska Handelsbanken AB, Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB, Swedbank A and Nordea Bank Abp against the European Securities and Markets Authority Decision PDF
829.04 KB
26/01/2016 BOA 2016 001 BoA 2016- 001 (Decision Kluge v EBA) Decision PDF
196.32 KB
08/10/2019 boa-2019-d-05_decision BOA decision creditreform_rating_ag_vs_eba Decision PDF
922.78 KB
30/11/2018 boa30.18 BoA Decision SEB appeal 30 November 2018 Decision PDF
416.77 KB
24/06/2013 BoA 2013-008 Board of Appeal Decision , Decision PDF
242.72 KB
The joint Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities (EBA, ESMA and EIOPA) has published today its decision in an appeal brought by an Estonian company against a decision of the EBA. It concerned the question whether the suitability of the managers of a significant branch of a bank may be a matter within EU law, and not just national law. Allowing the appeal, the Board of Appeal interpreted Directive No. 2006/48/EC consistently with the EBA Guidelines on the assessment of the suitability of members of the management body and key function holders. It came to the conclusion that the “fit and proper” requirement is not restricted to the persons who direct the business of the credit institution. The matter therefore was within the EBA’s powers of investigation. Although the appellant criticised the way in which the EBA dealt with its complaint, the Board of Appeal made it clear that it did not accept that criticism. It considered that the EBA dealt with the complaint in an appropriate manner. The ground on which the appeal was allowed was one of interpretation of the applicable legal provisions. The case was remitted to the EBA to adopt the appropriate decision in accordance with the Board of Appeal’s findings. This is for information only. The decision consists of the signed Decision only. For any enquiries, please contact EIOPA’s Press Office: Anzhelika Mayer Tel.: +49 69 9511 1968
17/07/2014 2014/C1/02 Board of Appeal Decision , Decision PDF
368.94 KB
The Joint Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities (the European Banking Authority, the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority and the European Securities and Markets Authority) published its decision in an appeal brought by SV Capital OÜ, an Estonian company, against a decision of the EBA. This was the second appeal to be considered by the Board of Appeal in this matter between the same parties concerning the question whether the suitability of the managers of a significant branch of a bank raised a question of Union law. Following the Board of Appeal’s affirmative decision of 24 June 2013, the appellant requested the EBA to initiate an investigation against the Estonian and Finnish Financial Supervision Authorities because their alleged failure to take action in respect of individuals in the Estonian branch of Nordea Bank Finland PLC whom it was alleged were not fit and proper persons to be key function holders in the bank. The EBA decided that it would not initiate an investigation.  The Board of Appeal decided that the EBA had been right to raise the matter with the national supervisors, but that having done so, it was entitled to take no further action in the light of their responses. The Board accordingly dismissed the appellant’s appeal against the EBA’s decision.
13/01/2014 BoA 2013-014 Board of Appeal Decision Global Private Rating Company v. ESMA , Decision PDF
361.96 KB
Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities dismisses appeal made by a refused CRA-applicant against ESMA On 10 January 2014, the Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities handed down its decision on an appeal by the appellant, Global Private Rating Company “Standard Rating” Ltd, against the refusal by the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) to register it as a credit rating agency. This is the first appeal against a decision by ESMA refusing an applicant registration as a credit rating agency. The Board of Appeal unanimously decided that the appeal should be dismissed, and that ESMA’s refusal decision should be confirmed. It stated that it accepted the appellant’s point that the registration of a credit rating agency by ESMA is a new process, and recognised that the procedures will to an extent take time fully to work out. Nevertheless, because of the responsibilities placed on credit rating agencies and their importance in the financial system generally, it considered that the onus must be on an applicant to satisfy ESMA that the relevant requirements are met. The application and its contents must be very clear, and it is not ESMA’s responsibility as regulator to remedy deficiencies.
21/07/2016 2016/1131 BoS Decision on Fitch Ratings Limited 21 July 2016 , Decision PDF
108.21 KB
23/07/2018 ESMA41-137-1153 BoS decision- CRA 2-2017- SEB Decision PDF
706.81 KB
23/07/2018 ESMA41-137-1145 BoS decision-CRA 2-2017- Danske Decision PDF
635.85 KB
23/07/2018 ESMA41-137-1150 BoS decision-CRA 2-2017- Nordea Decision PDF
714.78 KB
23/07/2018 ESMA41-137-1147 BoS decision-CRA 2-2017- Svenska Handelsbanken AB Decision PDF
690.73 KB

Pages