The ESMA Library contains all ESMA documents. Please use the search and filter options to find specific documents.
REFINE YOUR SEARCH
Type of document
MiFID - Investor Protection X Corporate Information X Board of Supervisors X Prospectus X Speech X Consultation Paper XReset all filters
|Date||Ref.||Title||Section||Type||Download||Info||Summary||Related Documents||Translated versions|
|11/03/2013||2013/279||"Regulation of systemically important financial institutions and of the shadow banking system"- speech by Steven Maijoor, Chair, at the CDU/CSU congress in Berlin||Corporate Information, Speeches||Speech||PDF
|19/11/2019||ESMA71-319-154||Banking and the MiFID II review||MiFID - Investor Protection, MiFID - Secondary Markets, Speeches||Speech||PDF
|17/07/2019||ESMA35-43-1905||Call for evidence Impact of the inducements and costs and charges disclosure requirements under MiFID II||MiFID - Investor Protection||Consultation Paper||PDF
|30/09/2019||ESMA-35-43-2090||Call for evidence on MiFID II product intervention powers||MiFID - Investor Protection||Consultation Paper||PDF
|18/01/2018||ESMA35-43-904||Call for Evidence – Potential product intervention measures on contracts for differences and binary options to retail clients||MiFID - Investor Protection||Consultation Paper||PDF
|26/01/2011||2011/35||Call for evidence- Request for technical advice on possible delegated acts concerning the Prospectus Directive (2003/71/EC) as amended by the Directive 2010/73/EU||Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure||Consultation Paper||PDF
|06/11/2014||2014/1339||Capital Markets Union: building competitive, efficient capital markets trusted by investors||Corporate Information, Speeches||Speech||PDF
|Steven Maijoor, ESMA Chair, spoke at the joint EU Commission/Italian Presidency Growth for Finance Conference in Brussels - " Excerpts "Following its launch by President Juncker in July 2014, the Capital Markets Union (CMU) is now a concept under construction and I am very happy to have been invited to contribute today to its development. When doing so, we should remember the clear objective from President Juncker who stated that the CMU should maximise the benefits of capital markets and non-bank financial institutions for the real economy. "Despite the many efforts of the past four decades, and the good results achieved, the EU capital market is still fragmented which limits its potential. For example, an institutional investor wanting to invest in a mid-sized company will still have a strong bias towards companies in its own Member-State. There are transactions not happening that otherwise would be beneficial both for the investor and the company because of this home bias. The reason for this stems from a complex set of barriers relating to such issues as transparency of Small and Medium-sized Entities (SMEs), differences in their governance and cross-border differences in the ownership of shares. In sum, we are only halfway there. While the EU capital market has integrated steadily in the past four decades it is not yet comparable with, for example, the US capital market. With a five year time-horizon in mind, what is needed to achieve a strong and integrated capital market to increase capital availability and to support economic growth in all 28 Member States? In my view, there are four main building blocks: (1) greater diversity in funding; (2) increasing the efficiency of capital markets; (3) strengthening and harmonisation of supervision; and (4) increasing the attractiveness of capital markets both for EU investors and for investors from outside the Union. "The CMU should be based on an accelerated integration of the capital markets of the 28 Member States. The end goal should be a CMU that is competitive, efficient and that provides a wide range of funding channels. Above all, it should be trusted by investors."|
|21/03/2018||ESMA71-99-964||CMU, Brexit and ESA review – What’s next? Steven Maijoor BVI Keynote||Fund Management, MiFID - Investor Protection, Speeches||Speech||PDF
|19/12/2018||ESMA35-43-1210||Consulation paper on integrating sustainability risks and factors in MiFID II||MiFID - Investor Protection||Consultation Paper|
|15/07/2019||ESMA35-43-2019||Consultation paper on compliance function guidelines||MiFID - Investor Protection||Consultation Paper||PDF
|05/10/2016||2016/1436||Consultation Paper on Draft guidelines on MiFID II product governance requirements||MiFID - Investor Protection||Consultation Paper||PDF
|26/09/2014||2014/1186||Consultation paper on draft RTS on prospectus related issues under the Omnibus II Directive||Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure||Consultation Paper||PDF
|ESMA invites comments on all matters in this paper and in particular on the specific questions summarised in Annex I. Comments are most helpful if they:• respond to the question stated;• indicate the specific question to which they relate;• contain a clear rationale; and• describe any alternatives ESMA should consider.ESMA will consider all comments received by 19 December 2014. All contributions should be submitted online at www.esma.europa.eu under the heading ‘Your input - Consultations’. Publication of responses All contributions received will be published following the close of the consultation, unless you request otherwise. Please clearly and prominently indicate in your submission any part you do not wish to be publically disclosed. A standard confidentiality statement in an email message will not be treated as a request for non-disclosure. A confidential response may be requested from us in accordance with ESMA’s rules on access to documents. We may consult you if we receive such a request. Any decision we make not to disclose the response is reviewable by ESMA’s Board of Appeal and the European Ombudsman.Data protection Information on data protection can be found at www.esma.europa.eu under the heading ‘Legal Notice’.Who should read this paper This document will be of interest to all stakeholders. It would primarily be of interest to investors, issuers, offerors or persons asking for admission to trading on a regulated market, as well as to any market participant who is affected by Directive 2003/71/EC of 4 November 2003 (the Prospectus Directive) as amended by Directive 2010/73/EU and Directive 2010/78/EU and its Regulation (Commission Regulation (EC) No 809/2004) and Delegated Regulations (Commission Delegated Regulation (EC) No 486/2012, No 862/2012, No 759/2013 and No 1392/2014.|
|15/12/2017||ESMA31-62-802||Consultation Paper on draft RTS under the new Prospectus Regulation||Prospectus||Consultation Paper||PDF
|22/12/2011||2011/446||Consultation paper on guidelines on certain aspects of the MiFID compliance function requirements||MiFID - Investor Protection||Consultation Paper||PDF
|13/07/2017||ESMA35-43-748||Consultation Paper on guidelines on certain aspects of the MiFID II suitability requirements||MiFID - Investor Protection||Consultation Paper||PDF
|22/12/2011||2011/445||Consultation paper on guidelines on certain aspects of the MiFID suitability requirements||MiFID - Investor Protection||Consultation Paper||PDF
|12/07/2019||ESMA31-62-1239||Consultation Paper on Guidelines on prospectus disclosure||Prospectus||Consultation Paper||PDF
|19/12/2018||ESMA35-43-1210||Consultation paper on integrating sustainability risks and factors in MiFID II||MiFID - Investor Protection||Consultation Paper||PDF
|22/05/2014||2014/549||Consultation Paper on MiFID II/MiFIR||MiFID - Investor Protection, MiFID - Secondary Markets||Consultation Paper||PDF
|This publication is the first step in the process of translating the MiFID II/MiFIR requirements into practically applicable rules and regulations to address the effects of the financial crisis and to improve financial market transparency and strengthen investor protection.MiFID II/MiFIR introduces changes that will have a large impact on the EU’s financial markets, these include transparency requirements for a broader range of asset classes; the obligation to trade derivatives on-exchange; requirements on algorithmic and high-frequency-trading and new supervisory tools for commodity derivatives. It will also strengthen protection for retail investors through limits on the use of commissions; conditions for the provision of independent investment advice; stricter organisational requirements for product design and distribution; product intervention powers; and the disclosure of costs and charges.Responding to this paperThe European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) invites responses to the specific questions listed in the ESMA MiFID II/MiFIR Consultation Paper.Please use this “form to reply”.The level 1 texts adopted by the European Council during its 13 May 2014 meeting are available here: MiFID II and MiFIR. These links are coming from the Council Press Release.|
|19/12/2014||2014/1570 Annex B||Consultation paper on MiFID II/MiFIR- Annex B||MiFID - Investor Protection, MiFID - Secondary Markets||Consultation Paper||PDF
|Who should read this paper?
This document will be of interest to all stakeholders involved in the securities markets. It is primarily of interest to competent authorities and firms that are subject to MiFID II and MiFIR – in particular, investment firms, credit institutions performing investment services and activities, data reporting services providers and trading venues. This paper is also important for trade associations and industry bodies, institutional and retail investors and their advisers, and consumer groups, as well as any market participant because the MiFID II and MiFIR requirements seek to implement enhanced provisions to ensure investor protection and the transparency and orderly running of financial markets with potential impacts for anyone engaged in the dealing with or processing of financial instruments.
Responding to this paper
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) invites responses to the specific questions listed in the ESMA MiFID II/MiFIR Consultation Paper.
Please note that ESMA will only be able to consider responses received using this “form to reply” and complying with the procedure below.
a) InstructionsPlease note that, in order to facilitate analysis of the large number of responses expected, ESMA will be using an IT tool that does not allow processing of responses which do not follow the formatting indications described below. Therefore, in responding stakeholders should:i. use the published template and send their responses in Word format (pdf documents will not be considered except for annexes); ii. not remove the tags of type