ESMA LIBRARY

The ESMA Library contains all ESMA documents. Please use the search and filter options to find specific documents.
28
DOCUMENTS

REFINE YOUR SEARCH

Sections

Type of document

Your filters
MiFID - Investor Protection X MiFID - Secondary Markets X Speeches X Trade Repositories X Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors X Credit Rating Agencies X Technical Advice X Compliance table X
Reset all filters
Date Ref. Title Section Type Download Info Summary Related Documents Translated versions
11/02/2020 ESMA35-43-1076 Compliance table for Guidelines on MiFID II product governance requirements (ESMA35-43-620) , Compliance table PDF
156.28 KB
06/11/2018 ESMA35-43-1215 Compliance table for Joint ESMA and EBA Guidelines on the assessment of the suitability of members of the management body , , Compliance table PDF
477.73 KB
20/09/2018 ESMA70-156-177 Compliance table for the Guidelines on the calibration of circuit breakers and publication of trading halts under MiFID II (ESMA70-872942901-63) Compliance table PDF
311.86 KB
21/03/2019 ESMA70-145-1345 Compliance table for the Guidelines on transaction reporting, order record keeping and clock synchronization under MiFID II , Compliance table PDF
131.72 KB
20/06/2019 ESMA35-43-1430 Compliance table on Guidelines on MiFID II suitability requirements , Compliance table PDF
117.21 KB
24/04/2014 2013/923 Compliance table- compliance guidelines , Compliance table PDF
74.45 KB
27/05/2020 ESMA35-43-2183 Compliance table- Guidelines for the assessment of knowledge and competence 2020 , Compliance table PDF
159.96 KB
10/03/2020 ESMA35-43-1957 Compliance table- Guidelines on complex debt instruments and structured deposits (ESMA/2015/1787) , Compliance table PDF
173.19 KB
10/03/2020 ESMA35-43-1968 Compliance table- Guidelines on cross-selling practices (ESMA/2016/574) , Compliance table PDF
162.94 KB
20/09/2018 ESMA70-156-350 Compliance table- Guidelines on the management body of market operators and DRSPs under MiFID II , Compliance table PDF
308.27 KB
24/04/2014 2013/922 Compliance table- suitability guidelines , Compliance table PDF
74.33 KB
03/09/2019 ESMA70-156-1411 Confirmation of compliance with Guidelines on the application of C6 and C7 of Annex 1 of MIFID II- COMPLIANCE TABLE Compliance table PDF
103.79 KB
04/02/2020 ESMA35-43-2134 ESMA’s Technical Advice to the Commission on the effects of product intervention measures Technical Advice PDF
425.6 KB
17/05/2011 2011/144 Final advice- ESMA´s Technical Advice to the Commission on Fees for CRAs Technical Advice PDF
1.72 MB
07/10/2014 2014-1213 Guidelines compliance table for Guidelines on remuneration policies and practices (MiFID) Compliance table PDF
127.73 KB
14/08/2015 2015/1261 Guidelines compliance table- Guidelines on the application of definitions C6 and C7 under MiFID I Compliance table
17/09/2014 2014/850rev Technical Advice in accordance with Article 39(b) 2 of the CRA Regulation Technical Advice PDF
370.42 KB
This document has been revised to reflect an amended figure in Table 1 and two re-classifications of solicitation status in Table 2. Article 39b(2) of the CRA Regulation states that the European Commission shall adopt a report by end 2014 – after receiving ESMA’s technical advice – on the appropriateness of the development of a European creditworthiness assessment for sovereign debt. In its request for advice, the Commission asked ESMA to provide input on the issue of sovereign ratings and rating processes including an overview of the market for sovereign ratings, information on operational issues regarding sovereign ratings, information on sovereign rating processes as well as lessons drawn from ESMA’s supervisory experience. Contents For the purposes of this advice, ESMA provides its views based on the quantitative information contained in the CEREP public database and on information publicly disclosed by credit rating agencies registered with ESMA. Additionally, ESMA’s advice has been informed by its first supervisory activities regarding the rating process for sovereign ratings of CRAs which are active in the EU sovereign rating market. In accordance with the CRA Regulation, these supervisory activities did not address the content of the sovereign methodologies themselves but rather were concerned with the independence, transparency and governance of the sovereign rating process. Sovereign credit ratings play a crucial role from a credit market and financial stability perspective, not least because sovereign governments account for the largest group of borrowers in capital markets in terms of volume. In addition the crucial importance of these sovereign ratings can be amplified by the “cascade” effect sovereign ratings have on other asset classes via their presence as factors in other asset methodologies. In the EU the sovereign rating market is composed of nine CRAs established in nine different EU member states. These nine CRAs exhibit a high level of variation with respect to the type and number of sovereign ratings they assign. Sovereign credit ratings themselves can also be differentiated in various ways depending on such factors as local/foreign currency, duration of issuance, whether the rating applies to a specific issuer or issuance and if it is solicited or unsolicited. In addition ESMA would like to emphasise the following points which it believes to be important when considering the appropriateness of the development of a European creditworthiness assessment of sovereign debt.
02/10/2015 2015/1472 Technical Advice on Competition, Choice and Conflicts of Interest in the CRA industry Technical Advice PDF
2.48 MB
31/05/2013 2013/626 Technical advice on CRA regulatory equivalence on Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, Hong Kong and Singapore Technical Advice PDF
840.48 KB
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has provided advice to the European Commission in respect of the equivalence between the EU regulatory regime for credit rating agencies and the respective legal and supervisory frameworks of Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, Hong Kong and Singapore. This is in response to the European Commission’s request for technical advice from ESMA on the equivalence of these jurisdictions legal and supervisory frameworks with the EU regulatory regime for credit rating agencies as set out in Regulation (EC) No. 1060/2009 of the European Parliament and the Council on credit rating agencies.  The European Commission has already published equivalence decisions on US, Canada and Australia, on 9 October 2012, and on Japan, 28 October 2010. Regarding compliance with the EU requirements on endorsement, ESMA has already indicated that it considers the legal and regulatory regime for CRAs supervision of the following countries as “as stringent as” the EU requirements: 15 March 2012, Hong Kong and Singapore; 18 April 2012, Argentina and Mexico; 27 April 2012, Brazil.
18/04/2012 2012/259 Technical advice on CRA regulatory equivalence- US, Canada and Australia Technical Advice PDF
697.78 KB
On 12 June 2009 the European Commission requested CESR, now ESMA, to provide its technical advice on the equivalence between the legal and supervisory framework of Japan, The United States, and Canada with the EU regulatory regime for credit rating agencies. (Regulation (EC) No. 1060/2009 of the European Parliament and the Council on credit rating agencies ). On 17 November 2009, the Commission also requested CESR to provide its technical advice on Australia. On 28 September 2010, the European Commission published an equivalence decision on Japan. With regard to the compliance with the EU requirements on endorsement, ESMA had already indicated that it considers the legal and regulatory regime for CRAs supervision of the following countries as “as stringent as” the EU requirements:        - On 22 December 2011, Japan and Australia;        - On 15 March 2012, US, Canada, Hong Kong and Singapore. This report sets out ESMA’s advice to the European Commission in respect of the equivalence between the US (Part I), Canada (Part II) and Australia (Part III) respective legal and supervisory frameworks and the EU regulatory regime for credit rating agencies.