ESMA LIBRARY
The ESMA Library contains all ESMA documents. Please use the search and filter options to find specific documents.
182
REFINE YOUR SEARCH
Sections
- (-) Remove MiFID - Secondary Markets filter MiFID - Secondary Markets
- (-) Remove MiFID - Investor Protection filter MiFID - Investor Protection
- (-) Remove Post Trading filter Post Trading
- (-) Remove Fund Management filter Fund Management
- (-) Remove Brexit filter Brexit
- (-) Remove Innovation and Products filter Innovation and Products
- (-) Remove Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group filter Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group
- Short Selling (33) Apply Short Selling filter
- Market Integrity (29) Apply Market Integrity filter
- COVID-19 (11) Apply COVID-19 filter
- Corporate Disclosure (7) Apply Corporate Disclosure filter
- Market Abuse (7) Apply Market Abuse filter
- Credit Rating Agencies (6) Apply Credit Rating Agencies filter
- Joint Committee (4) Apply Joint Committee filter
- Prospectus (4) Apply Prospectus filter
- Supervisory convergence (4) Apply Supervisory convergence filter
- Benchmarks (2) Apply Benchmarks filter
- Securitisation (2) Apply Securitisation filter
- Transparency (2) Apply Transparency filter
- Corporate Information (1) Apply Corporate Information filter
- IFRS Supervisory Convergence (1) Apply IFRS Supervisory Convergence filter
- Warnings and publications for investors (1) Apply Warnings and publications for investors filter
Type of document
- (-) Remove Opinion filter Opinion
- (-) Remove Technical Standards filter Technical Standards
- Reference (310) Apply Reference filter
- Guidelines & Recommendations (202) Apply Guidelines & Recommendations filter
- Press Release (147) Apply Press Release filter
- Consultation Paper (137) Apply Consultation Paper filter
- Letter (89) Apply Letter filter
- Final Report (87) Apply Final Report filter
- Statement (79) Apply Statement filter
- SMSG Advice (76) Apply SMSG Advice filter
- Report (66) Apply Report filter
- Speech (61) Apply Speech filter
- Summary of Conclusions (34) Apply Summary of Conclusions filter
- Compliance table (29) Apply Compliance table filter
- Technical Advice (28) Apply Technical Advice filter
- Investor Warning (26) Apply Investor Warning filter
- Q&A (25) Apply Q&A filter
- Decision (11) Apply Decision filter
- Annual Report (6) Apply Annual Report filter
- Vacancy (2) Apply Vacancy filter
Your filters
MiFID - Investor Protection X MiFID - Secondary Markets X Sustainable finance X Trade Repositories X Post Trading X Innovation and Products X Brexit X Fund Management X Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group X Opinion X Technical Standards X
Reset all filters| Date | Ref. | Title | Section | Type | Download | Info | Summary | Related Documents | Translated versions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13/10/2011 | 2011/342 | Opinion- Practical arrangements for the late transposition of the UCITS IV Directive | Fund Management | Opinion | PDF 41.33 KB |
||||
| 27/09/2012 | 2012/600 | Draft technical standards under the Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on OTC Derivatives, CCPs and Trade Repositories | Post Trading | Technical Standards | PDF 1.88 MB |
||||
| 20/11/2012 | 2012/721 | Opinion on Article 50(2)(a) of the UCITS Directive | Fund Management | Opinion | PDF 81.31 KB |
||||
| 01/08/2013 | 2013/1072 | Practical arrangements for the late transposition of the AIFMD | Fund Management | Opinion | PDF 93.1 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has published an Opinion on arrangements for the late imposition of the AIFMD. The scope of the opinion is confined to the provision of collective portfolio management services. Arrangements before implementation of the Directive in all Member States Notification of marketing of EU AIFs when the host MS of the AIFM has not transposed the Directive (Articles 31 and 32 of the Directive) ESMA believes that, if the Directive has been transposed in the home MS of the AIFM, the competent authority of the host MS of the AIFM (Article 32) or home MS of the AIFM (Article 31) may not refuse a valid notification under the Directive on the ground that the Directive has not yet been transposed in the host MS. This applies irrespective of whether the marketing is done using the freedom to provide services or by means of a branch. Management passport (Article 33 of the Directive) ESMA believes that AIFMs established in a MS that has transposed the Directive should be able to manage an EU AIF via the management passport, both using the freedom to provide services or by means of a branch, in a MS where the Directive has not been transposed, irrespective of the provisions currently in place in such jurisdiction since the relevant provisions of the Directive are of a self-executing nature, and provided the AIFM is authorised to manage that type of AIF in accordance with Article 33(1) of the AIFMD. Any local restrictions on AIFMs that are not in accordance with the AIFMD will need to be disapplied. | |||
| 08/08/2013 | 2013/1087 | Final Report on amended EMIR implementing technical standards | Post Trading | Technical Standards | PDF 335.07 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has sent the European Commission a Final Report proposing an amendment to Article 5 of the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No.1247/2012 (ITS on reporting) on the format and frequency of reporting to trade repositories under EMIR. The amendment relates specifically to the reporting of exchange traded derivatives (ETDs) and proposes postponing the reporting start date by one year. Background Article 5 regards the reporting start date of derivatives to trade repositories, however the current dates do not include a specification of ETDs. This specification would be useful as there is a risk currently that reporting of ETDs is not harmonised unless further regulatory guidance is issued. Based on the need to ensure the consistent implementation of EMIR, ESMA considered that guidelines and recommendations should be developed in relation to this issue. A delay in the reporting date for ETD transactions will allow sufficient time for the development of the relevant guidelines and their implementation by counterparties, trade repositories and regulators. The European Commission has three months to decide whether to endorse ESMA’s draft implementing technical standards. |
|||
| 01/10/2013 | 2013/1340 | Collection of information for the effective monitoring of systemic risk under Article 24(5), first sub-paragraph, of the AIFMD | Fund Management | Opinion | PDF 70.75 KB |
||||
| 18/11/2013 | 2013/1657 | Draft technical standards under EMIR on contracts with a direct, substantial and foreseeable effect within the Union and non-evasion | Post Trading | Technical Standards | PDF 394.75 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has issued final draft regulatory technical standards (RTS) related to derivative transactions by non-European Union (EU) counterparties. The RTS implement provisions of the Regulation on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories (EMIR). |
|||
| 15/03/2013 | 2013/312 | Regulatory technical standards on colleges for central counterparties supplementing Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 | Post Trading | Opinion | PDF 151.67 KB |
||||
| 02/04/2013 | 2013/413 | Final Report- Draft regulatory technical standards on types of AIFMs | Fund Management | Technical Standards | PDF 116.08 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has published its draft regulatory technical standards (RTS) to determine types of alternative investment fund managers (AIFMs), where relevant in the application of the AIFMD. The draft RTS distinguish AIFMs managing alternative investment funds (AIF) of the open-ended type and AIFMs managing AIFs of the closed-ended type, in order to apply the rules on liquidity management, the valuation procedures and the transitional provisions of the AIFMD. ESMA was required to develop these RTS by Article 4(4) of the AIFMD and they are aimed at ensuring uniform conditions of application of the AIFMD across the European Union. | |||
| 01/10/2014 | 2014/1184 | Final report on ESMA's draft technical standards on the Clearing Obligation for Interest Rate OTC Derivatives | Post Trading | Technical Standards | PDF 1.17 MB |
||||
| 18/12/2014 | 2014/1378 | Opinion- Investment-based crowdfunding | Innovation and Products | Opinion | PDF 460.92 KB |
Crowdfunding is a means of raising finance for projects from ‘the crowd’ often by means of an internet-based platform through which project owners ‘pitch’ their idea to potential backers, who are typically not professional investors. It takes many forms, not all of which involve the potential for a financial return. ESMA’s focus is on crowdfunding which involves investment, as distinct from donation, non-monetary reward or loan agreement. Crowdfunding is relatively young and business models are evolving. EU financial services rules were not designed with the industry in mind. Within investment-based crowdfunding a range of different operational structures are used so it is not straightforward to map crowdfunding platforms’ activities to those regulated under EU legislation. Member States and NCAs have been working out how to treat crowdfunding, with some dealing with issues case-by-case, some seeking to clarify how crowdfunding fits into existing rules and others introducing specific requirements.To assist NCAs and market participants, and to promote regulatory and supervisory convergence, ESMA has assessed typical investment-based crowdfunding business models and how they could evolve, risks typically involved for project owners, investors and the platforms themselves and the likely components of an appropriate regulatory regime. ESMA then prepared a detailed analysis of how the typical business models map across to the existing EU legislation, set out in this document. | |||
| 07/02/2014 | 2014/146 | MiFID practices for firms selling complex products | MiFID - Investor Protection, Warnings and publications for investors | Opinion | PDF 122.37 KB |
||||
| 19/12/2014 | 2014/1571 | Final Report on draft Implementing Technical Standards on main indices and recognised exchanges under the Capital Requirements Regulation | MiFID - Secondary Markets | Technical Standards | PDF 281.16 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has developed draft Implementing Technical Standards specifying main indices and recognised exchanges as required under Paragraph 8 of Article 197 of Regulation (EU) 575/2013 (Capital Requirements Regulation). These have now been submitted to the European Commission submitted for endorsement of the draft ITS.It has 3 months to make this decision. | |||
| 20/02/2014 | 2014/160 | Draft implementing technical standards on notification- EuVECA | Fund Management | Technical Standards | PDF 175.99 KB |
||||
| 20/02/2014 | 2014/161 | Draft implementing technical standards on notification- EuSEF | Fund Management | Technical Standards | PDF 29.18 KB |
||||
| 27/03/2014 | 2014/332 | Structured Retail Products- Good practices for product governance arrangements | MiFID - Investor Protection, Innovation and Products | Opinion | PDF 203.1 KB |
Legal basis 1. Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 (ESMA Regulation) sets out the European Securities and Markets Authority’s (ESMA) scope of action, tasks and powers which include “enhancing customer protection”, and “foster[ing] investor protection”. 2. In order to continue delivering on this investor protection statutory objective, ESMA is issuing this opinion on certain aspects linked to the manufacturing and distribution of structured retail products (SRP). This opinion takes into account relevant work done in this field both at European and interna-tional level. 3. This opinion is without prejudice to the requirements for the provision of investment services and activities established in the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) and its implementing measures (notably, Directive 2006/73/EC), the regulatory developments arising from the MiFID review or existing product rules that may apply to SRPs. 4. ESMA’s competence to deliver an opinion is based on Article 29(1) (a) of the ESMA Regulation. In accordance with Article 44(1) of the ESMA Regulation, the Board of Supervisors has adopted this opinion. Background 5. In its July 2013 report on ‘Retailisation in the EU’ , ESMA highlighted that, from a consumer protec-tion perspective, retail investors may face difficulties in understanding the drivers of risks and returns of structured products. If retail investors do not properly understand the risk and reward profile of structured products, and if the products are not properly assessed against the risk appetite of retail investors, retail investors might be exposed to unexpected losses and this might lead to complaints, reputational risks for manufacturers and distributors, and a loss of confidence in the regulatory framework and, more broadly, in financial markets. 6. In 2013, ESMA mapped the measures adopted in the EU Member States in relation to complex products in order to identify issues and to better understand the rationale behind national initiatives (by looking at similarities and differences in the various approaches, and reviewing how complexity has been treated in the different EU Members States). 7. As a result, ESMA has developed a broad set of non-exhaustive examples of good practices, attached as Annex 1 hereto, illustrating arrangements that firms - taking into account the nature, scale and complexity of their business - could put in place to improve their ability to deliver on investor protection regarding, in particular, (i) the complexity of the SRPs they manufacture or distribute, (ii) the nature and range of the investment services and activities undertaken in the course of that business, and (iii) the type of investors they target. These good practices should also be a helpful tool for competent authorities in carrying out their supervisory action. Opinion 8. ESMA considers that sound product governance arrangements are fundamental for investor protec-tion purposes, and can reduce the need for product intervention actions by competent authorities. 9. ESMA considers that, when supervising firms manufacturing or distributing an SRP, competent authorities should promote, in their supervisory approaches, the examples of good practices for firms set out in Annex 1 hereto. 10. Although the good practices set out in Annex 1 hereto focus on structured products sold to retail investors, ESMA considers that they may also be a relevant reference for other types of financial in-struments (such as asset-backed securities, or contingent convertible bonds), as well as when financial instruments are being sold to professional clients. 11. The exposure to risk is an intrinsic feature of investment products. The good practices set out in Annex 1 refer to product governance arrangements and do not (and cannot) aim at removing investment risk from products. | |||
| 28/05/2014 | 2014/576 | Voting Procedures for CCP colleges under EMIR | Post Trading | Opinion | PDF 94.15 KB |
||||
| 28/09/2015 | 2015-ESMA-1464 | Final Report- draft RTS and ITS on MIFID II and MiFIR | MiFID - Secondary Markets | Technical Standards | PDF 2.74 MB |
||||
| 28/09/2015 | 2015-ESMA-1464 Annex I | 2015-ESMA-1464 Annex I- draft RTS and ITS on MiFID II and MiFIR | MiFID - Secondary Markets | Technical Standards | PDF 2.85 MB |
||||
| 30/06/2015 | 2015/1006 | Final Report on MiFID II-MiFIR draft technical standards on authorisation, passporting, registration of third country firms and cooperation between competent authorities | MiFID - Investor Protection | Technical Standards | PDF 357.16 KB |