ESMA LIBRARY

The ESMA Library contains all ESMA documents. Please use the search and filter options to find specific documents.
74
DOCUMENTS

REFINE YOUR SEARCH

Sections

Type of document

Your filters
MiFID - Investor Protection X Corporate Disclosure X Credit Rating Agencies X Benchmarks X Innovation and Products X Joint Committee X Trade Repositories X Prospectus X Crowdfunding X Market Abuse X Market Integrity X MiFID - Secondary Markets X Q&A X Decision X
Reset all filters

Pages

Date Ref. Title Section Type Download Info Summary Related Documents Translated versions
19/12/2016 2016/1673 2016-1673 Q&A on MiFID II commodity derivatives topics MiFID - Secondary Markets Q&A PDF
338.93 KB
15/07/2019 esma41-139-1231 Amended decision Handelsbanken Credit Rating Agencies Decision PDF
244.4 KB
15/07/2019 esma41-139-1224 Amended_decision_nordea Credit Rating Agencies Decision PDF
236.05 KB
15/07/2019 esma41-139-1229 Amended_decision_seb Credit Rating Agencies Decision PDF
239.8 KB
15/07/2019 esma41-139-1230 Amended_decision_swedbank Credit Rating Agencies Decision PDF
243.03 KB
24/06/2013 BoA 2013-008 Board of Appeal Decision Joint Committee, Board of Appeal Decision PDF
242.72 KB		 The joint Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities (EBA, ESMA and EIOPA) has published today its decision in an appeal brought by an Estonian company against a decision of the EBA. It concerned the question whether the suitability of the managers of a significant branch of a bank may be a matter within EU law, and not just national law. Allowing the appeal, the Board of Appeal interpreted Directive No. 2006/48/EC consistently with the EBA Guidelines on the assessment of the suitability of members of the management body and key function holders. It came to the conclusion that the “fit and proper” requirement is not restricted to the persons who direct the business of the credit institution. The matter therefore was within the EBA’s powers of investigation. Although the appellant criticised the way in which the EBA dealt with its complaint, the Board of Appeal made it clear that it did not accept that criticism. It considered that the EBA dealt with the complaint in an appropriate manner. The ground on which the appeal was allowed was one of interpretation of the applicable legal provisions. The case was remitted to the EBA to adopt the appropriate decision in accordance with the Board of Appeal’s findings. This is for information only. The decision consists of the signed Decision only. For any enquiries, please contact EIOPA’s Press Office: Anzhelika Mayer Tel.: +49 69 9511 1968
17/07/2014 2014/C1/02 Board of Appeal Decision Joint Committee, Board of Appeal Decision PDF
368.94 KB		 The Joint Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities (the European Banking Authority, the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority and the European Securities and Markets Authority) published its decision in an appeal brought by SV Capital OÜ, an Estonian company, against a decision of the EBA. This was the second appeal to be considered by the Board of Appeal in this matter between the same parties concerning the question whether the suitability of the managers of a significant branch of a bank raised a question of Union law. Following the Board of Appeal’s affirmative decision of 24 June 2013, the appellant requested the EBA to initiate an investigation against the Estonian and Finnish Financial Supervision Authorities because their alleged failure to take action in respect of individuals in the Estonian branch of Nordea Bank Finland PLC whom it was alleged were not fit and proper persons to be key function holders in the bank. The EBA decided that it would not initiate an investigation.  The Board of Appeal decided that the EBA had been right to raise the matter with the national supervisors, but that having done so, it was entitled to take no further action in the light of their responses. The Board accordingly dismissed the appellant’s appeal against the EBA’s decision.
13/01/2014 BoA 2013-014 Board of Appeal Decision Global Private Rating Company v. ESMA Joint Committee, Board of Appeal Decision PDF
361.96 KB		 Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities dismisses appeal made by a refused CRA-applicant against ESMA On 10 January 2014, the Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities handed down its decision on an appeal by the appellant, Global Private Rating Company “Standard Rating” Ltd, against the refusal by the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) to register it as a credit rating agency. This is the first appeal against a decision by ESMA refusing an applicant registration as a credit rating agency. The Board of Appeal unanimously decided that the appeal should be dismissed, and that ESMA’s refusal decision should be confirmed. It stated that it accepted the appellant’s point that the registration of a credit rating agency by ESMA is a new process, and recognised that the procedures will to an extent take time fully to work out. Nevertheless, because of the responsibilities placed on credit rating agencies and their importance in the financial system generally, it considered that the onus must be on an applicant to satisfy ESMA that the relevant requirements are met. The application and its contents must be very clear, and it is not ESMA’s responsibility as regulator to remedy deficiencies.
21/07/2016 2016/1131 BoS Decision on Fitch Ratings Limited 21 July 2016 Credit Rating Agencies, Press Releases Decision PDF
108.21 KB
23/07/2018 ESMA41-137-1153 BoS decision- CRA 2-2017- SEB Credit Rating Agencies Decision PDF
706.81 KB
23/07/2018 ESMA41-137-1145 BoS decision-CRA 2-2017- Danske Credit Rating Agencies Decision PDF
635.85 KB
23/07/2018 ESMA41-137-1150 BoS decision-CRA 2-2017- Nordea Credit Rating Agencies Decision PDF
714.78 KB
23/07/2018 ESMA41-137-1147 BoS decision-CRA 2-2017- Svenska Handelsbanken AB Credit Rating Agencies Decision PDF
690.73 KB
23/07/2018 ESMA41-137-1152 BoS decision-CRA 2-2017- Swedbank Credit Rating Agencies Decision PDF
715.12 KB
31/01/2019 ESMA35-43-1562 CFD Renewal Decision (2) Notice MiFID - Investor Protection Decision PDF
103.92 KB		 encsdadeelesetfifrhrhuitltlvmtnlplplptroskslsv
31/10/2018 ESMA35-43-1397 CFD Renewal Decision Notice MiFID - Investor Protection Decision PDF
101.55 KB		 enenenenenenenenenenenenenenenenenenenenenen
30/03/2021 ESMA41-356-114 Decision 1-2021 Moody's UK Board of Supervisors, Credit Rating Agencies Decision PDF
728.73 KB
30/03/2021 ESMA41-356-129 Decision 2-2021 Moody's France Board of Supervisors, Credit Rating Agencies Decision PDF
352.97 KB
esma71-99-1622_cra_enforcement_case_moodys_march_2021.pdf
esma41-356-168_public_notices_moodys_uk_de_es_fr_it.pdf
30/03/2021 ESMA41-356-130 Decision 3-2021 Moody's Germany Board of Supervisors, Credit Rating Agencies Decision PDF
333.78 KB
esma71-99-1622_cra_enforcement_case_moodys_march_2021.pdf
esma41-356-168_public_notices_moodys_uk_de_es_fr_it.pdf
30/03/2021 ESMA41-356-131 Decision 4-2021 Moody's Italy Board of Supervisors, Credit Rating Agencies Decision PDF
350.91 KB
esma71-99-1622_cra_enforcement_case_moodys_march_2021.pdf
esma41-356-168_public_notices_moodys_uk_de_es_fr_it.pdf

Pages