ESMA LIBRARY

The ESMA Library contains all ESMA documents. Please use the search and filter options to find specific documents.
144
DOCUMENTS

REFINE YOUR SEARCH

Sections

Type of document

Your filters
Q&A X Opinion X Reference X Speech X Market Abuse X MiFID - Investor Protection X Procurement X Sustainable finance X
Reset all filters

Pages

Date Ref. Title Section Type Download Info Summary Related Documents Translated versions
30/05/2005 AMP Austria Accepted Market Pratices: Valuation transaction on the bond market on the Vienna Stock Exchange (Austria) Reference PDF
78.74 KB
The Austrian provisions in their original form can be found by clicking on the following link.
30/05/2005 Austria Accepted Market Practices- Austrian provisions- Not continued under MAR Reference PDF
19.9 KB
30/05/2005 AMP France Buy Back Accepted Market Practices: a market practice related to share buy back programs. Buy an hold for future use as means of payment for acquiring another company on Euronext (France)- Not continued under MAR Reference PDF
71.11 KB
30/05/2005 AMP France Liquidity Accepted Market Practices: a market practice related to share buy back programs. Liquidity contracts on Euronext (France) Reference PDF
107.34 KB
11/02/2008 AMP Spain Accepted Market Practices: Liquidity Contracts (Spain) – Replaced by an accepted market practice under MAR on 11 July 2017 Reference PDF
157.13 KB
19/08/2008 AMP Portugal Accepted Market Practices: Liquidity Contracts (Portugal) – To be replaced by an accepted market practice under MAR Reference PDF
101.04 KB

The national legal text is available on the CMVM website.

15/01/2009 AMP Greece Accepted Market Practices: Purchase of own shares to hold them for future acquisition of shares of another company (Greece)- Not continued under MAR Reference PDF
77.84 KB
23/06/2011 AMP Netherlands Accepted Market Practices: Liquidity agreements (Netherlands)- TERMINATED UNDER MAR ON 19 September 2017 Reference PDF
96.72 KB

The publication (in Dutch) of the decision to terminate the Dutch AMP on liquidity agreements can be found on the AFM’s website at the following link https://www.afm.nl/nl-nl/professionals/nieuws/2017/sep/beeindigen-amp.
 

22/06/2012 2012/382 MiFID Q&A in the area of investor protection and intermediaries Q&A PDF
319.78 KB
22/06/2012 AMF AMP 2012 Accepted market practices: Liquidity contracts for bonds (France)- Not continued under MAR Reference PDF
242.43 KB
01/08/2012 2012/490 Call for expressions of interest in ESMA's Consultative Working Group on Investor Protection and Intermediaries Standing Committee Reference PDF
130.34 KB
The deadline for responses to this call for interest has been extended two weeks, to 14 September 2012.
03/08/2012 OJ/26/06/2012 - tendes specs Tender specifications- Annex VII- Financial porposal Reference PDF
47.23 KB
16/08/2012 QA 84 - 87 OJ/26/06/2012-PROC/2012/004 Q&A 84-87 regarding tender ESMA registers Reference PDF
82.32 KB
19/10/2012 2012/682 Guide to investing , Reference PDF
569.39 KB
19/12/2012 2012/850 MiFID supervisory briefing- Suitability Reference PDF
238 KB
16/10/2013 2013/LCC/039 ESMA Specific Privacy Notice – Public procurement , Reference PDF
119.46 KB
21/10/2013 Ares(2013)3304576 REQUEST TO ESMA FOR TECHNICAL ADVICE ON POSSIBLE DELEGATED ACTS CONCERNING THE REGULATION ON INSIDER DEALING AND MARKET MANIPULATION (MARKET ABUSE) ((EC)No XX/2013) , Reference PDF
56.55 KB
REQUEST TO ESMA FOR TECHNICAL ADVICE ON POSSIBLE DELEGATED ACTS CONCERNING THE REGULATION ON INSIDER DEALING AND MARKET MANIPULATION (MARKET ABUSE) ((EC)No XX/2013)
07/02/2014 2014/146 MiFID practices for firms selling complex products , Opinion PDF
122.37 KB
27/03/2014 2014/332 Structured Retail Products- Good practices for product governance arrangements , Opinion PDF
203.1 KB
Legal basis 1.    Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 (ESMA Regulation)  sets out the European Securities and Markets Authority’s (ESMA) scope of action, tasks and powers which include “enhancing customer protection”, and “foster[ing] investor protection”.  2.    In order to continue delivering on this investor protection statutory objective, ESMA is issuing this opinion on certain aspects linked to the manufacturing and distribution of structured retail products (SRP). This opinion takes into account relevant work done in this field both at European and interna-tional level.  3.    This opinion is without prejudice to the requirements for the provision of investment services and activities established in the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID)  and its implementing measures (notably, Directive 2006/73/EC), the regulatory developments arising from the MiFID review or existing product rules that may apply to SRPs.  4.    ESMA’s competence to deliver an opinion is based on Article 29(1) (a) of the ESMA Regulation. In accordance with Article 44(1) of the ESMA Regulation, the Board of Supervisors has adopted this opinion. Background 5.    In its July 2013 report on ‘Retailisation in the EU’ , ESMA highlighted that, from a consumer protec-tion perspective, retail investors may face difficulties in understanding the drivers of risks and returns of structured products. If retail investors do not properly understand the risk and reward profile of structured products, and if the products are not properly assessed against the risk appetite of retail investors, retail investors might be exposed to unexpected losses and this might lead to complaints, reputational risks for manufacturers and distributors, and a loss of confidence in the regulatory framework and, more broadly, in financial markets. 6.    In 2013, ESMA mapped the measures adopted in the EU Member States in relation to complex products in order to identify issues and to better understand the rationale behind national initiatives (by looking at similarities and differences in the various approaches, and reviewing how complexity has been treated in the different EU Members States). 7.    As a result, ESMA has developed a broad set of non-exhaustive examples of good practices, attached as Annex 1 hereto, illustrating arrangements that firms - taking into account the nature, scale and complexity of their business - could put in place to improve their ability to deliver on investor protection regarding, in particular, (i) the complexity of the SRPs they manufacture or distribute, (ii) the nature and range of the investment services and activities undertaken in the course of that business, and (iii) the type of investors they target. These good practices should also be a helpful tool for competent authorities in carrying out their supervisory action. Opinion 8.    ESMA considers that sound product governance arrangements are fundamental for investor protec-tion purposes, and can reduce the need for product intervention actions by competent authorities. 9.    ESMA considers that, when supervising firms manufacturing or distributing an SRP, competent authorities should promote, in their supervisory approaches, the examples of good practices for firms set out in Annex 1 hereto. 10.    Although the good practices set out in Annex 1 hereto focus on structured products sold to retail investors, ESMA considers that they may also be a relevant reference for other types of financial in-struments (such as asset-backed securities, or contingent convertible bonds), as well as when financial instruments are being sold to professional clients. 11.    The exposure to risk is an intrinsic feature of investment products. The good practices set out in Annex 1 refer to product governance arrangements and do not (and cannot) aim at removing investment risk from products.
21/08/2014 2014/808 response form Response form to the CP on technical advice under the Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) Reference DOCX
792.65 KB

Please use this form to respond to the Consultation Paper.

Pages