ESMA LIBRARY
REFINE YOUR SEARCH
Sections
- (-) Remove Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors filter Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors
- (-) Remove IFRS Supervisory Convergence filter IFRS Supervisory Convergence
- (-) Remove Sustainable finance filter Sustainable finance
- (-) Remove MiFID II: Transparency Calculations and DVC filter MiFID II: Transparency Calculations and DVC
- (-) Remove Audit filter Audit
- CESR Archive (276) Apply CESR Archive filter
- Post Trading (146) Apply Post Trading filter
- MiFID - Secondary Markets (111) Apply MiFID - Secondary Markets filter
- Fund Management (92) Apply Fund Management filter
- Corporate Information (83) Apply Corporate Information filter
- Credit Rating Agencies (62) Apply Credit Rating Agencies filter
- Board of Supervisors (58) Apply Board of Supervisors filter
- Joint Committee (56) Apply Joint Committee filter
- MiFID - Investor Protection (56) Apply MiFID - Investor Protection filter
- Corporate Disclosure (52) Apply Corporate Disclosure filter
- Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group (45) Apply Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group filter
- Management Board (43) Apply Management Board filter
- Planning reporting budget (43) Apply Planning reporting budget filter
- International cooperation (40) Apply International cooperation filter
- Warnings and publications for investors (38) Apply Warnings and publications for investors filter
- Securitisation (36) Apply Securitisation filter
- Supervisory convergence (33) Apply Supervisory convergence filter
- Market Abuse (28) Apply Market Abuse filter
- Innovation and Products (24) Apply Innovation and Products filter
- Market Integrity (24) Apply Market Integrity filter
- Prospectus (24) Apply Prospectus filter
- Benchmarks (22) Apply Benchmarks filter
- Trading (22) Apply Trading filter
- European Single Electronic Format (21) Apply European Single Electronic Format filter
- Corporate Finance (18) Apply Corporate Finance filter
- Short Selling (16) Apply Short Selling filter
- Transparency (16) Apply Transparency filter
- Procurement (15) Apply Procurement filter
- Trade Repositories (15) Apply Trade Repositories filter
- Guidelines and Technical standards (14) Apply Guidelines and Technical standards filter
- Careers (12) Apply Careers filter
- Securities Financing Transactions (11) Apply Securities Financing Transactions filter
- CCP Directorate (9) Apply CCP Directorate filter
- Brexit (6) Apply Brexit filter
- Corporate Governance (6) Apply Corporate Governance filter
- ITMG (4) Apply ITMG filter
- Press Releases (4) Apply Press Releases filter
- Board of Appeal (3) Apply Board of Appeal filter
- Crowdfunding (3) Apply Crowdfunding filter
- Speeches (3) Apply Speeches filter
- IAS Regulation (2) Apply IAS Regulation filter
- COVID-19 (1) Apply COVID-19 filter
- ESMA newsletter (1) Apply ESMA newsletter filter
- Market data (1) Apply Market data filter
- Vacancies (1) Apply Vacancies filter
Type of document
- (-) Remove Reference filter Reference
- (-) Remove Consultation Paper filter Consultation Paper
- Report (61) Apply Report filter
- Press Release (57) Apply Press Release filter
- Final Report (49) Apply Final Report filter
- Letter (39) Apply Letter filter
- Statement (29) Apply Statement filter
- Speech (8) Apply Speech filter
- Annual Report (2) Apply Annual Report filter
- SMSG Advice (2) Apply SMSG Advice filter
- Compliance table (1) Apply Compliance table filter
- Guidelines & Recommendations (1) Apply Guidelines & Recommendations filter
- Opinion (1) Apply Opinion filter
Date | Ref. | Title | Section | Type | Download | Info | Summary | Related Documents | Translated versions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10/11/2011 | 2011/373 | Consultation paper- Considerations of materiality in financial reporting | Corporate Disclosure, IFRS Supervisory Convergence | Consultation Paper | PDF 170.93 KB |
||||
16/08/2012 | 2012/526 | Announcement of roundtable on materiality in financial reporting- 1 October 12 | IFRS Supervisory Convergence | Reference | PDF 100.21 KB |
||||
12/11/2012 | 2012/725 | European common enforcement priorities for 2012 financial statements | IFRS Supervisory Convergence | Reference | PDF 163.78 KB |
||||
11/01/2013 | 2013/12 | Principles for Benchmarks-Setting Processes in the EU | Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors | Consultation Paper | PDF 259.33 KB |
||||
11/01/2013 | EBA/REC/2013/01 | EBA Recommendations on supervisory oversight of activities related to banks’ participation in the Euribor panel | Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors | Reference | PDF 207.84 KB |
||||
19/07/2013 | 2013/1013 | Guidelines on enforcement of financial information | Corporate Disclosure, IFRS Supervisory Convergence | Consultation Paper | PDF 540.55 KB |
Responding to this paper The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) is seeking comments on all matters covered in this paper and in particular on the specific questions summarised in Annex 1. Comments are most helpful if they: respond to the question stated; indicate the specific question to which the comment relates; contain a clear rationale; and describe any alternatives ESMA should consider. Deadline ESMA will consider all comments received by 15 October 2013. All contributions should be submitted online at www.esma.europa.eu under the heading “Your input - Consultations” Publication of responses All contributions received will be published following the close of the consultation, unless you request otherwise. Please clearly and prominently indicate in your submission any part you do not wish to be publicly disclosed. A standard confidentiality statement in an email message will not be treated as a request for non-disclosure. A confidential response may be requested from us in accordance with ESMA’s rules on access to documents. We may consult you if we receive such a request. Any decision we make not to disclose the response is reviewable by ESMA’s Board of Appeal and the European Ombudsman. Data protection Information on data protection can be found at www.esma.europa.eu under the heading “Legal Notice”. Who should read this paper All interested parties are invited to respond to this consultation paper. It will primarily be of interest to those charged with the governance of issuers preparing financial information, users of financial information, auditors, and other parties who have a particular interest in financial reporting. |
|||
13/02/2014 | 2014/175 | ESMA Guidelines on Alternative Performance Measures | Corporate Disclosure, IFRS Supervisory Convergence | Consultation Paper | PDF 319.12 KB |
Reasons for publication In October 2005, the Committee of European Securities Regulators (CESR), ESMA’s predecessor body, published a Recommendation on Alternative Performance Measures (“CESR Recommendation” CESR/05-178b). The CESR Recommendation was issued mainly in order to reinforce the objectives of Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 July 2002 on the application of international accounting standards. Given the CESR Recommendation has now been in force for more than 8 years, ESMA has decided to review it with the objective of strengthening the principles contained in it. ESMA now plans to re-issue the principles as ESMA [draft] guidelines thus ensuring that issuers and NCAs will make every effort to com-ply with them. Contents ESMA is issuing this Consultation Paper (CP) to inform market participants about the background to its decision to revise the CESR Recommendation and seek their views on such revision. Section II “Introduction” indicates the reasons for which ESMA believes that these [draft] guidelines on APMs should be issued. Section III “Scope and purpose of the [draft] guidelines” indicates when the [draft] guidelines apply and how these [draft] guidelines interact with financial statements. Section IV “Compliance and reporting obligations” describes how issuers and NCAs should comply with the [draft] guidelines. Section V “[Draft] Guidelines on APMs (Background)” describes the rationale followed in preparing the [draft] guidelines and explanations on the principles provided, which are included in full in Annex III. ESMA would appreciate any comments and answers from stakeholders on the questions contained in the consultation paper. For your convenience, the questions are summarised in annex II. Next steps ESMA will consider the feedback it receives to this consultation in 2014 and expects to publish final guide-lines in the fourth quarter of 2014. |
|||
28/02/2014 | 2014/205 | Call for expressions of interest: Group of Economic Advisers for ESMA’s Committee for Economic and Markets Analysis | Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors | Reference | PDF 158.95 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) is seeking to appoint new members to its Group of Economic Advisors (GEA) for the Committee for Economic and Markets Analysis (CEMA). This follows the expiry of the term of the current GEA. CEMA has established the GEA in order to benefit from the expertise of stakeholders specialised in the topics of financial stability and general economic research related to financial markets. CEMA looks to this group to provide it with advice regarding our work related to financial stability and economic background analysis for the regulatory and supervisory tasks of ESMA. The closing date for application is 25 April 2014. Application form | |||
11/06/2014 | ESMA/WP/2 | ESMA Working Paper- The systemic dimension of hedge fund illiquidity and prime brokerage | Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors | Reference | PDF 839.63 KB |
We analyse the potentially vulnerable and systemically relevant financial intermediation chain established by hedge funds and prime brokers. Our dataset covers the 306 largest global hedge funds and their prime brokers over the period July 2001 to December 2011. The study illustrates that hedge funds and prime brokers act as complementary trading partners in normal times. However, we observe that this form of financial intermediation may be severely impaired in times of market distress. This can be explained by the hoarding of liquid securities by prime brokers who are eager to avert runs by their clients. | |||
11/06/2014 | ESMA/WP/1 | ESMA Working Paper- Monitoring the European CDS market through networks: Implications for contagion risks | Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors | Reference | PDF 1005.17 KB |
Based on a unique data set referencing exposures on single name credit default swaps (CDS) on European reference entities, we study the structure and the topology of the European CDS market and its evolution from 2008 to 2012, resorting to network analysis. The structural features revealed show bilateral CDS exposures describing growing scale-free networks whose highly interconnected hubs constitute both a strength and weakness for the stability of the system. The potential “super spreaders” of financial contagion, identified as the most interconnected participants, consist mostly of banks. For some of them net notional exposures may be particularly large relative to their total common equity. Our findings also point to the importance of some non-dealer/non-bank participants belonging to the shadow banking system. | |||
15/01/2015 | ESMA/WP/2015/1 | ESMA Working Paper- Real-world and risk-neutral probabilities in the regulation on the transparency of structured products | Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors | Reference | PDF 480.24 KB |
The price of derivatives (and hence of structured products) can be calculated as the discounted value of expected future payoffs, assuming standard hypotheses on frictionless and complete markets and on the type of stochastic processes for the price of the underlying. However, the probabilities used in the pricing process do not represent “real” probabilities of future events, because they are based on the assumption that market participants are risk-neutral. This paper reviews the relevant mathematical finance literature, and clarifies that the risk-neutrality hypothesis is acceptable for pricing, but not to forecast the future value of an asset. Therefore, we argue that regulatory initiatives that mandate intermediaries to give retail investors information on the probability that, at a future date, the value of a derivative will be higher or lower than a given threshold (so-called “probability scenarios”) should explicitly reference probabilities that take into account the risk premium (so-called “real-world” probabilities). We also argue that, though probability scenarios may look appealing to foster investor protection, their practical implementation, if based on the right economic approach, raises significant regulatory and enforcement problems. | |||
14/09/2015 | 2015/1291 | Risk Dashboard No. 3, 2105 | Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors | Reference | PDF 848.31 KB |
||||
16/12/2015 | 2015/1882 | Risk Dashboard No. 4, 2015 | Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors | Reference | PDF 931.3 KB |
||||
11/02/2016 | 2016/209 | ToR CEMA | Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors | Reference | PDF 128.84 KB |
||||
17/03/2016 | 2016/349 | Risk Dashboard No.1, 2016 | Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors | Reference | PDF 874.51 KB |
||||
04/04/2016 | 2016/216 | ToR EECS | IFRS Supervisory Convergence | Reference | PDF 103.12 KB |
||||
04/04/2016 | 2016/218 | ToR Audit Working Group | Audit | Reference | PDF 113.35 KB |
||||
04/04/2016 | 2016/217 | ToR IFRS PG | IFRS Supervisory Convergence | Reference | PDF 95.62 KB |
||||
11/05/2016 | 2016/647 | Risk Dashboard No.2, 2016 | Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors | Reference | PDF 854.56 KB |
||||
02/06/2016 | 2016/773 | Discussion Paper on the Distributed Ledger Technology Applied to Securities Markets | Innovation and Products, Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors | Consultation Paper | PDF 573.86 KB |