REFINE YOUR SEARCH
Type of document
|Date||Ref.||Title||Section||Type||Download||Info||Summary||Related Documents||Translated versions|
|21/10/2013||Ares(2013)3304576||REQUEST TO ESMA FOR TECHNICAL ADVICE ON POSSIBLE DELEGATED ACTS CONCERNING THE REGULATION ON INSIDER DEALING AND MARKET MANIPULATION (MARKET ABUSE) ((EC)No XX/2013)||Market Abuse, Market Integrity||Reference||PDF
|REQUEST TO ESMA FOR TECHNICAL ADVICE ON POSSIBLE DELEGATED ACTS CONCERNING THE REGULATION ON INSIDER DEALING AND MARKET MANIPULATION (MARKET ABUSE) ((EC)No XX/2013)|
|15/02/2016||2016/288 RF||Reply Form DP BMR||Market Integrity||Reference||DOCX
|04/04/2016||2016/218||ToR Audit Working Group||Audit||Reference||PDF
|04/04/2016||2016/222||ToR MISC||Market Integrity||Reference||PDF
|03/06/2016||2016/723 RF||Reply form for the Consultation Paper on ESMA technical advice on Benchmarks Regulation||Market Integrity, Benchmarks||Reference||DOCX
|13/07/2016||2016/1130||Final Report on the Market Abuse Regulation Guidelines||Market Abuse, Market Integrity||Report||PDF
|26/07/2016||2016/1171||Final Report Draft Implementing Technical Standards on sanctions and measures under MAR||Market Abuse, Market Integrity||Final Report||PDF
|29/09/2016||2016/1406 reply form||Reply form to the Consultation paper on Benchmarks||Benchmarks||Reference||DOCX
|30/09/2016||2016/1412||Final Report on MAR Guidelines on commodity derivatives||Guidelines and Technical standards, Market Abuse, Market Integrity||Final Report||PDF
Article 7(5) of MAR provides that the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) shall issue guidelines to establish a non-exhaustive indicative list of information which is reasonably expected or is required to be disclosed in accordance with legal or regulatory provisions in Union or national law, market rules, contract, practice or custom, on the relevant commodity derivatives markets or spot markets as referred to in Article 7(1)(b) of MAR. This final report follows the Consultation Paper (CP) issued on March 2016.
Section 2 contains information on the background and mandate, while Section 3 sets out ESMA’s feedback to the CP responses in relation to the scope of the guidelines, the financial instruments and products covered by the examples of information relating directly and indirectly to commodity derivatives and information directly relating to a spot market contract. It also indicates whether and where ESMA has changed the guidelines following the consultation.
Annex I lists questions raised in the CP. Annex 2 provides the legislative mandate on the basis of which ESMA is issuing these guidelines. Annex 3 sets out ESMA’s view on the costs and benefits associated with these guidelines. Annex 4 contains the text of the guidelines.
The guidelines in Annex 4 will be translated into the official languages of the European Union and published on the ESMA’s website. Within 2 months of the issuance of the translations, each national competent authority will have to confirm whether it complies or intends to comply with those guidelines. In the event that a national competent authority does not comply or does not intend to comply, it will have to inform ESMA, stating its reasons. ESMA will publish the fact that a national competent authority does not comply or does not intend to comply with those guidelines.
|30/09/2016||2016/1414||Methodological Framework- Model Written Arrangements for Benchmark Colleges||Benchmarks||Reference||PDF
Article 46 of the Regulation (EU) No 2016/1011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on indices used as benchmarks in financial instruments and financial contracts or to measure the performance of investment funds (Regulation) provides that the competent authority of an administrator of a critical benchmark that is referred to in points (a) and (c) of Article 20(1) of the Regulation shall establish a college.
ESMA will be a member of every college and according to Article 46(7) of the Regulation may give advice concerning the written arrangements. To promote the convergent operation of benchmark colleges, ESMA has developed model written arrangements that may be used by administrators of critical benchmarks according to Article 46(6) of the Regulation.
|10/11/2016||2016-1560||Final Report on Technical Advice under the Benchmarks Regulation||Benchmarks||Final Report||PDF
|29/03/2017||ESMA70-145-48||Draft technical standards under the Benchmarks Regulation||Benchmarks||Report||PDF
|01/06/2017||ESMA7--145-100||Final report on MAR ITS on cooperation between competent authorities||Market Abuse, Market Integrity||Final Report||PDF
|02/06/2017||ESMA70-143-5||Methodological framework for mandatory benchmarks contributions||Benchmarks||Report||PDF
|02/06/2017||ESMA70-145-81||Final report on draft RTS on cooperation with third countries under BMR||Benchmarks||Final Report||PDF
|29/09/2017||ESMA70-145-253||Response form for the Consultation Paper on Guidelines for non-significant benchmarks||Benchmarks||Reference||DOCX
|16/10/2017||ESMA65-8-5046||FIRDS- Instructions on access and download of full and delta reference data files||ITMG, Market Integrity, MiFID - Secondary Markets, MiFID II: Transparency Calculations and DVC||Reference||PDF
|29/11/2017||ECB/ESMA/FSMA||Risk Free Rate Working Group Application Form||Benchmarks||Reference||DOCX
|06/12/2017||ESMA71-99-669||ESMA MIFID and MAR Data Systems||Market Abuse, Market Integrity, MiFID - Secondary Markets, MiFID II: Transparency Calculations and DVC||Reference||PDF