ESMA LIBRARY
REFINE YOUR SEARCH
Sections
- (-) Remove Joint Committee filter Joint Committee
- (-) Remove Trade Repositories filter Trade Repositories
- (-) Remove Trading filter Trading
- CESR Archive (109) Apply CESR Archive filter
- MiFID - Secondary Markets (96) Apply MiFID - Secondary Markets filter
- MiFID - Investor Protection (75) Apply MiFID - Investor Protection filter
- Guidelines and Technical standards (45) Apply Guidelines and Technical standards filter
- Market Integrity (42) Apply Market Integrity filter
- Short Selling (41) Apply Short Selling filter
- Credit Rating Agencies (25) Apply Credit Rating Agencies filter
- Fund Management (24) Apply Fund Management filter
- Post Trading (24) Apply Post Trading filter
- Board of Appeal (19) Apply Board of Appeal filter
- Board of Supervisors (18) Apply Board of Supervisors filter
- COVID-19 (17) Apply COVID-19 filter
- Management Board (12) Apply Management Board filter
- Market Abuse (12) Apply Market Abuse filter
- Corporate Disclosure (9) Apply Corporate Disclosure filter
- Corporate Information (9) Apply Corporate Information filter
- Prospectus (7) Apply Prospectus filter
- Supervisory convergence (7) Apply Supervisory convergence filter
- Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group (5) Apply Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group filter
- Benchmarks (4) Apply Benchmarks filter
- Brexit (4) Apply Brexit filter
- Innovation and Products (4) Apply Innovation and Products filter
- Securitisation (3) Apply Securitisation filter
- Transparency (3) Apply Transparency filter
- Careers (2) Apply Careers filter
- IFRS Supervisory Convergence (2) Apply IFRS Supervisory Convergence filter
- Press Releases (1) Apply Press Releases filter
- Procurement (1) Apply Procurement filter
- Warnings and publications for investors (1) Apply Warnings and publications for investors filter
Type of document
- (-) Remove Decision filter Decision
- (-) Remove Opinion filter Opinion
- (-) Remove Compliance table filter Compliance table
- (-) Remove CESR Document filter CESR Document
- Reference (121) Apply Reference filter
- Guidelines & Recommendations (78) Apply Guidelines & Recommendations filter
- Final Report (44) Apply Final Report filter
- Press Release (41) Apply Press Release filter
- Consultation Paper (39) Apply Consultation Paper filter
- Letter (28) Apply Letter filter
- Statement (23) Apply Statement filter
- Report (22) Apply Report filter
- Summary of Conclusions (11) Apply Summary of Conclusions filter
- Q&A (10) Apply Q&A filter
- Speech (9) Apply Speech filter
- Annual Report (5) Apply Annual Report filter
- SMSG Advice (3) Apply SMSG Advice filter
- Investor Warning (2) Apply Investor Warning filter
- Technical Advice (2) Apply Technical Advice filter
- Technical Standards (2) Apply Technical Standards filter
Date | Ref. | Title | Section | Type | Download | Info | Summary | Related Documents | Translated versions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
24/10/2012 | JC/CP/2012/01 Feedback statement | ESA feedback statement on the Joint CP on Financial Conglomerates | Joint Committee | CESR Document | PDF 82.95 KB |
||||
24/06/2013 | BoA 2013-008 | Board of Appeal Decision | Joint Committee, Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 242.72 KB |
The joint Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities (EBA, ESMA and EIOPA) has published today its decision in an appeal brought by an Estonian company against a decision of the EBA. It concerned the question whether the suitability of the managers of a significant branch of a bank may be a matter within EU law, and not just national law. Allowing the appeal, the Board of Appeal interpreted Directive No. 2006/48/EC consistently with the EBA Guidelines on the assessment of the suitability of members of the management body and key function holders. It came to the conclusion that the “fit and proper” requirement is not restricted to the persons who direct the business of the credit institution. The matter therefore was within the EBA’s powers of investigation. Although the appellant criticised the way in which the EBA dealt with its complaint, the Board of Appeal made it clear that it did not accept that criticism. It considered that the EBA dealt with the complaint in an appropriate manner. The ground on which the appeal was allowed was one of interpretation of the applicable legal provisions. The case was remitted to the EBA to adopt the appropriate decision in accordance with the Board of Appeal’s findings. This is for information only. The decision consists of the signed Decision only. For any enquiries, please contact EIOPA’s Press Office: Anzhelika Mayer Tel.: +49 69 9511 1968 | |||
18/12/2013 | ESA/2013/035 | Joint Opinion-Review on the functioning of the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB) | Joint Committee | Opinion | PDF 142.63 KB |
Joint Opinion-Review on the functioning of the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB) | |||
13/01/2014 | BoA 2013-014 | Board of Appeal Decision Global Private Rating Company v. ESMA | Joint Committee, Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 361.96 KB |
Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities dismisses appeal made by a refused CRA-applicant against ESMA On 10 January 2014, the Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities handed down its decision on an appeal by the appellant, Global Private Rating Company “Standard Rating” Ltd, against the refusal by the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) to register it as a credit rating agency. This is the first appeal against a decision by ESMA refusing an applicant registration as a credit rating agency. The Board of Appeal unanimously decided that the appeal should be dismissed, and that ESMA’s refusal decision should be confirmed. It stated that it accepted the appellant’s point that the registration of a credit rating agency by ESMA is a new process, and recognised that the procedures will to an extent take time fully to work out. Nevertheless, because of the responsibilities placed on credit rating agencies and their importance in the financial system generally, it considered that the onus must be on an applicant to satisfy ESMA that the relevant requirements are met. The application and its contents must be very clear, and it is not ESMA’s responsibility as regulator to remedy deficiencies. | |||
17/07/2014 | 2014/C1/02 | Board of Appeal Decision | Joint Committee, Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 368.94 KB |
The Joint Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities (the European Banking Authority, the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority and the European Securities and Markets Authority) published its decision in an appeal brought by SV Capital OÜ, an Estonian company, against a decision of the EBA. This was the second appeal to be considered by the Board of Appeal in this matter between the same parties concerning the question whether the suitability of the managers of a significant branch of a bank raised a question of Union law. Following the Board of Appeal’s affirmative decision of 24 June 2013, the appellant requested the EBA to initiate an investigation against the Estonian and Finnish Financial Supervision Authorities because their alleged failure to take action in respect of individuals in the Estonian branch of Nordea Bank Finland PLC whom it was alleged were not fit and proper persons to be key function holders in the bank. The EBA decided that it would not initiate an investigation. The Board of Appeal decided that the EBA had been right to raise the matter with the national supervisors, but that having done so, it was entitled to take no further action in the light of their responses. The Board accordingly dismissed the appellant’s appeal against the EBA’s decision. | |||
02/12/2014 | 2014/BOA/05 | Decision by the ESA BoA concerning Investor Protection Europe sprl | Joint Committee, Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 229.85 KB |
The Joint Board of Appeal of the ESAs decides on the inadmissibility of an appeal brought by IPE sprl, a company based in Brussels, against a decision by ESMAThe Joint Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities published today its decision in an appeal brought by Investor Protection Europe (IPE) sprl, a company based in Brussels, against a decision of the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) of 10 June 2014 not to initiate an investigation under Article 17 of the ESMA Regulation regarding an alleged breach of Union law by the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier of Luxembourg. The Board of Appeal unanimously decided that the appeal was inadmissible, and in the light of that decision, did not consider the substance of IPE’s complaint. | |||
18/02/2015 | JC/GL/2014/43 Appendix 1 | Compliance table for JC guidelines for complaints-handling for the securities (ESMA) and banking (EBA) sectors | Guidelines and Technical standards, Joint Committee | Compliance table | PDF 187.15 KB |
The table contains details of the competent authorities* who comply or intend to comply with the ESAs’ Joint Guidelines on complaints-handling for the securities (ESMA) and banking (EBA) sectors. |
|||
14/08/2015 | BOA/2015/001 | Decision of the Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities given under Article 60 of Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010 and the Board of Appeal’s Rules of Procedure (BOA 2012 002) | Joint Committee, Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 147.78 KB |
||||
31/03/2016 | 2016/408 | Decision to adopt a supervisory measure taking the form of a public notice and to impose a fine in accordance with Statement of Findings in accordance with Articles 64(5), 65, 67 and 73 of Regulation (EC) No 648/2012 EMIR | Trade Repositories | Decision | PDF 62.47 KB |
Decision to adopt a supervisory measure taking the form of a public notice and to impose a fine in accordance with Statement of Findings in accordance with Articles 64(5), 65, 67 and 73 of Regulation (EC) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories Public notice regarding negligent breach by DTCC Derivatives Repository Ltd of its legal obligation to ensure immediate access for regulators to data reported under EMIR DTCC Derivatives Repository Ltd (‘DDRL’) is a trade repository registered in the European Union and is part of the DTCC group which includes a number of companies providing post-trading services to the global financial services industry. DDRL was registered by ESMA as a trade repository under Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories (‘EMIR’) on 7 November 2013. ESMA has responsibilities for the supervision and enforcement of provisions under EMIR concerning DDRL and other trade repositories registered in the EU. In May 2014, ESMA’s supervisory team became aware of delays in providing regulators with access to data reported to DDRL under EMIR. Following further examination, the supervisory team formed the view that there were serious indications of the possible existence of facts liable to constitute one or more of the infringements listed in EMIR. The matter was accordingly referred to an independent investigation officer (the ‘IIO’). The IIO considered the evidence referred to him and conducted further investigations, before submitting his findings to ESMA’s Board of Supervisors (the ‘ESMA Board’). Based on the findings of the IIO and the evidence put before it, the ESMA Board found on 23 March 2016 that an examination of the facts showed that DDRL had committed the following infringement under EMIR and had done so negligently. DDRL committed an infringement of EMIR by not allowing regulators and supervisors direct and immediate access to the details of derivatives contracts they need to fulfil their responsibilities and mandates. |
|||
12/05/2016 | ESA/2016/41 | Opinion of the ESAs- ECAI credit assessments | Credit Rating Agencies, Joint Committee | Opinion | PDF 379.79 KB |
||||
30/04/2018 | BoA 2018-01 | Decision in an appeal by A v ESMA | Board of Appeal, Joint Committee | Decision | PDF 392.62 KB |
||||
28/10/2020 | ESMA70-155-11072 | ESMA decision renewal of 16 September 2020 to lower the reporting thresholds of net short positions under Art.28 of the SSR | Trading | Decision | PDF 395.8 KB |
bgcsdadeelesetfifrhrhuitltlvmtnlplptroskslsv | |||
08/03/2021 | ESMA70-151-2536 | compliance table Guidelines APC Measures | Guidelines and Technical standards, Trade Repositories | Compliance table | PDF 141.15 KB |
||||
26/03/2021 | JC 2021 16 | ESAs’ Opinion to the European Commission on the Jurisdictional Scope of Application of the SECR | Joint Committee, Securitisation | Opinion | PDF 339.91 KB |
||||
12/07/2021 | ESMA41-356-187 | Decision- DTCC Derivatives Repository | Board of Supervisors, Trade Repositories | Decision | PDF 1.13 MB |
||||
23/09/2021 | ESMA41-356-233 | Decision- UnaVista Limited | Trade Repositories | Decision | PDF 996.23 KB |
||||
10/12/2021 | JC/2015/087 | Compliance Table GL financial conglomerates | Guidelines and Technical standards, Joint Committee | Compliance table | PDF 300.38 KB |
||||
17/12/2021 | ESMA35-43-1215 | Compliance table for Joint ESMA and EBA Guidelines on the assessment of the suitability of members of the management body | Guidelines and Technical standards, Joint Committee, MiFID - Investor Protection | Compliance table | PDF 302.18 KB |
||||
24/03/2022 | ESMA41-356-271 | Decision of the Board of Supervisors to adopt supervisory measures and impose fines in respect of infringements committed by REGIS-TR, S.A | Board of Supervisors, Trade Repositories | Decision | PDF 1.17 MB |
||||
02/05/2022 | ESMA70-449-497 | Opinion RTS liquidity contracts for SME Growth Market issuers | Market Integrity, MiFID - Investor Protection, MiFID - Secondary Markets, Trading | Opinion | PDF 849.59 KB |