ESMA LIBRARY
REFINE YOUR SEARCH
Sections
- (-) Remove Joint Committee filter Joint Committee
- (-) Remove Market Integrity filter Market Integrity
- (-) Remove Transparency filter Transparency
- (-) Remove Corporate Finance filter Corporate Finance
- (-) Remove European Single Electronic Format filter European Single Electronic Format
- CESR Archive (292) Apply CESR Archive filter
- Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group (77) Apply Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group filter
- Post Trading (51) Apply Post Trading filter
- Fund Management (38) Apply Fund Management filter
- Credit Rating Agencies (27) Apply Credit Rating Agencies filter
- MiFID - Secondary Markets (27) Apply MiFID - Secondary Markets filter
- MiFID - Investor Protection (23) Apply MiFID - Investor Protection filter
- Corporate Disclosure (18) Apply Corporate Disclosure filter
- Prospectus (14) Apply Prospectus filter
- Market Abuse (12) Apply Market Abuse filter
- Benchmarks (9) Apply Benchmarks filter
- Trading (7) Apply Trading filter
- Securitisation (6) Apply Securitisation filter
- Short Selling (5) Apply Short Selling filter
- Supervisory convergence (5) Apply Supervisory convergence filter
- Sustainable finance (4) Apply Sustainable finance filter
- Corporate Governance (3) Apply Corporate Governance filter
- Guidelines and Technical standards (3) Apply Guidelines and Technical standards filter
- IFRS Supervisory Convergence (3) Apply IFRS Supervisory Convergence filter
- Innovation and Products (3) Apply Innovation and Products filter
- Securities Financing Transactions (3) Apply Securities Financing Transactions filter
- Trade Repositories (3) Apply Trade Repositories filter
- CCP Directorate (2) Apply CCP Directorate filter
- Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors (2) Apply Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors filter
- Corporate Information (1) Apply Corporate Information filter
- Crowdfunding (1) Apply Crowdfunding filter
- Market data (1) Apply Market data filter
- MiFID II: Transparency Calculations and DVC (1) Apply MiFID II: Transparency Calculations and DVC filter
Type of document
- (-) Remove Consultation Paper filter Consultation Paper
- (-) Remove CESR Document filter CESR Document
- (-) Remove SMSG Advice filter SMSG Advice
- Reference (90) Apply Reference filter
- Guidelines & Recommendations (74) Apply Guidelines & Recommendations filter
- Final Report (38) Apply Final Report filter
- Press Release (35) Apply Press Release filter
- Opinion (32) Apply Opinion filter
- Letter (30) Apply Letter filter
- Statement (23) Apply Statement filter
- Report (17) Apply Report filter
- Decision (12) Apply Decision filter
- Speech (9) Apply Speech filter
- Compliance table (5) Apply Compliance table filter
- Q&A (4) Apply Q&A filter
- Technical Standards (4) Apply Technical Standards filter
- Annual Report (3) Apply Annual Report filter
- Technical Advice (3) Apply Technical Advice filter
- Investor Warning (1) Apply Investor Warning filter
Date | Ref. | Title | Section | Type | Download | Info | Summary | Related Documents | Translated versions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
14/09/2011 | 2011/288 | Call for evidence- Empty voting | Corporate Disclosure, Corporate Governance, Transparency | Consultation Paper | PDF 81.13 KB |
||||
06/03/2012 | JC/DP/2012/1 | Joint Discussion Paper on Draft Regulatory Technical Standards on risk mitigation techniques for OTC derivatives not cleared by a CCP under the Regulation on OTC derivatives, CCPs and Trade Repositories | Joint Committee | Consultation Paper | PDF 402.37 KB |
EBA, EIOPA and ESMA (the ESAs) invite market participants and all interested stakeholders to provide their feedback on planned regulatory technical standards covering risk mitigation techniques for OTC derivatives not cleared by central counterparties. The EMIR Regulation (“the Regulation”) on OTC Derivatives, CCPs and trade repositories introduces provisions to improve transparency and reduce the risks associated with the OTC derivatives market and establishes common rules for central counterparties (CCPs) and for trade repositories (TRs). The Regulation acknowledges that not all OTC derivatives would meet the necessary requirements to be centrally cleared. For this reason, it introduces provisions on risk mitigation techniques for OTC derivatives not cleared by a CCP. | |||
07/05/2012 | 2012/278 | Call for evidence on Transaction reporting | Market Integrity | Consultation Paper | PDF 286 KB |
This call for evidence seeks to collect interested parties’ views on what elements ESMA should consider in its work on guidelines on harmonised transaction reporting, as well as opinions on what areas of the OTC derivatives guidelines need to be updated. On the basis of responses received to this call for evidence, ESMA will define its further work on guidelines on harmonised transaction reporting and launch a full public consultation. | |||
14/05/2012 | JC/CP/2012/01 | EBA, EIOPA and ESMA’s Joint Consultation Paper on its proposed response to the Commission’s Review of the Financial Conglomerates Directive | Joint Committee | Consultation Paper | PDF 590.22 KB |
||||
29/06/2012 | 2012/415 | Call for Evidence on Empty Voting | Transparency, Corporate Disclosure | CESR Document | PDF 275.66 KB |
ESMA launched a Call for Evidence on Empty Voting in September 2011 to analyse the potential issues and concerns raised by the practice of empty voting and to examine whether there was a possible need for further action. An analysis of the responses received to the consultation has led ESMA to conclude that there is insufficient evidence to justify any regulatory action at the European level at present. | |||
31/08/2012 | JC/CP/2012/02 | Joint consultation paper on Draft Regulatory Technical Standards on the uniform conditions of application of the calculation methods under Article 6.2 of the Financial Conglomerates Directive | Joint Committee | Consultation Paper | PDF 769.24 KB |
Please send your comments to the EBA, EIOPA and ESMA by email to joint-committee@eba.europa.eu, jointcommittee@eiopa.europa.eu and joint.committee@esma.europa.eu by 05.10.2012, indicating the reference ‘JC CP 2012 02’ in the subject field. Please note that comments submitted after the deadline, or sent to another e-mail address will not be processed. | |||
24/10/2012 | JC/CP/2012/01 Feedback statement | ESA feedback statement on the Joint CP on Financial Conglomerates | Joint Committee | CESR Document | PDF 82.95 KB |
||||
24/10/2012 | JC/CP/2012/01 Responses | Responses to the Joint CP on Financial Conglomerates | Joint Committee | Consultation Paper | PDF 183.7 KB |
||||
25/10/2012 | JC/CP/2012/02 Responses | Responses to the second Joint CP on Financial Conglomerates | Joint Committee | Consultation Paper | ZIP 4.54 MB |
||||
20/03/2013 | 2013/318 | Feedback Statement on proposed amendments to the ESMA update of the CESR recommendations for the consistent implementation of the Prospectuses Regulation regarding mineral companies | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure, Transparency | CESR Document | PDF 265.19 KB |
||||
06/11/2013 | JC-CP-2013-03 | Draft guidelines for complaints-handling for the securities (ESMA) and banking (EBA) sectors | Joint Committee | Consultation Paper | PDF 192.58 KB |
Reasons for publication Consumers in the EU can purchase, and firms can offer, financial services and products in the investment, banking and insurance sectors across the EU Single Market. In order to increase market confidence of all participants, the Joint Committee of the three European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) is seeking to develop a harmonised approach to handling complaints. The three ESAs are doing so through guidelines that, once adopted, will apply equally across all 28 Member States and will be the same for all three sectors of financial services. To that end, ESMA and the EBA have developed guidelines for the investment and banking sectors that build on the existing complaints-handling guidelines established by EIOPA for the insurance sector. The objective is to allow EU consumers to refer to a single set of complaints-handling arrangements, irrespective of the type of product or service or the geographical location of the firm in question. This, in turn, will also allow firms to streamline and standardise their complaints-handling arrangements, and national regulators to supervise the same requirements across all sectors of financial services. ESMA and the EBA expect to publish the final guidelines in Q1 2014. Consultation process Comments should be sent to ESMA and the EBA by e-mail to sarah.raisin@esma.europa.eu and joint-committee@eba.europa.eu. Please note that the deadline for the submission of comments is 7 February 2014. All contributions received will be published following the close of the consultation, unless requested otherwise. | |||
07/11/2013 | JC CP 2013 02 | Joint Consultation Paper On Mechanistic references to credit ratings in the ESAs’ guidelines and recommendations | Joint Committee | Consultation Paper | PDF 347.81 KB |
The Joint Committee of the European Supervisory Authorities (EBA, ESMA and EIOPA - ESAs) is launching today a one-month public consultation on the removal of mechanistic references to credit ratings in their guidelines and on the definition of sole and mechanistic reliance on such ratings. The term “sole and mechanistic reliance on credit ratings” is mentioned in Article 5b(1) of the European Regulation on Credit Rating Agencies (Regulation (EU) No 462/2013). However, neither its formal definition nor explanations of its meaning are included in the document. In order to have a common approach towards this issue, the ESAs have developed a definition of “sole and mechanistic reliance”, and are consulting with market participants on whether this definition is clear and can be used in practice. The consultation paper contains: - a proposed definition for “sole or mechanistic reliance”, including examples; - the provisions in the three ESAs’ guidelines that are not to be defined as mechanistic; and - those provisions that are to be considered as mechanistic and therefore should be amended. The ESAs intend to refer to this definition in all their future guidelines, recommendations and draft technical standards where relevant. The current public consultation also contributes to the initiative of the Financial Stability Board to reduce the reliance on ratings. The consultation paper is available on the websites of the three ESAs: EBA, ESMA and EIOPA. The consultation will end at close of business on 5 December. Responses can be made here. | |||
14/11/2013 | 2013/1649 | ESMA’s policy orientations on possible implementing measures under the Market Abuse Regulation | Market Abuse, Market Integrity | Consultation Paper | PDF 950.26 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has published a Discussion Paper setting out its initial views on the implementing measures it will have to develop for the new Market Abuse Regulation (MAR). MAR aims to enhance market integrity and investor protection. It will achieve this by updating and strengthening the existing market abuse framework, by extending its scope to new markets and trading strategies, and by introducing new requirements. The Discussion Paper presents positions and regulatory options on those issues where ESMA will have to develop MAR implementing measures, likely to include Regulatory Technical Standards, Delegated Acts and Guidelines. These implementing measures are of fundamental importance to the new regime, as they set out how MAR’s enlarged scope is to be implemented in practice by market participants, trading platforms, investors, issuers and persons related to financial markets. In developing these regulatory options ESMA, where similar requirements already exist under the current Market Abuse Directive (MAD), has taken into consideration the existing MAD Level 2 texts and ESMA/CESR guidelines to set out the DP positions in light of the extended scope of MAR. This Discussion Paper is based on the version of the MAR Level 1 text agreed by the European Parliament, the Council and the European Commission on 24 June 2013. Consultation Reference 2013/1649 Closing date for responses Monday, 27 January 2014 Contact market.integrity[at]esma.europa.eu | |||
21/03/2014 | 2014/300 | Draft Regulatory Technical Standards on major shareholdings and indicative list of financial instruments subject to notification requirements under the revised Transparency Directive | Corporate Disclosure, Transparency | Consultation Paper | PDF 883.94 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has launched a consultation on draft Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) under the revised Transparency Directive relating to the notification of major shareholdings and the indicative list of financial instruments subject to notification requirements. The consultation runs until 30 May 2014. The revised Transparency Directive 2013/50/EC (TD) was published in the Official Journal of the European Union on 6 November 2013 and entered into force on 27 November 2013. ESMA is required to submit certain draft Regulatory Technical Standards (RTSs) on major shareholdings (for details on each RTS, see the relevant section) to the European Commission (Commission or EC) by 27 November 2014. According to Articles 10 and 15 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing ESMA (ESMA Regulation), ESMA must conduct a public consultation before submitting draft RTSs to the Commission. This Consultation Paper (CP) therefore seeks stakeholders’ views on proposals for such RTSs. The input from stakeholders will help ESMA finalise the draft RTSs. Respondents to this CP are encouraged to consider the costs and benefits that the draft RTSs would imply and provide the relevant data to support their arguments or proposals. The CP also seeks stakeholders’ views on the proposed content of an indicative list of financial instru-ments referenced to shares and with economic effect similar to holding shares and entitlements to acquire shares. To respond | |||
14/04/2014 | JC/CP/2014/03 | EBA, ESMA and EIOPA consultation paper on draft technical standards under EMIR | Joint Committee | Consultation Paper | PDF 1.11 MB |
||||
24/07/2014 | CP/2014/04 | Draft Regulatory Technical Standards on risk concentration and intra-group transactions under Article 21a (1a) of the Financial Conglomerates Directive | Joint Committee | Consultation Paper | PDF 324.25 KB |
Please send your comments to the EBA and EIOPA using the following links: Respond to the EBA. Respond to EIOPA. The consultation period closes on 24 October 2014. | |||
30/10/2014 | JC/2014/01 add | Addendum to Joint CP on draft ITS on the mapping of ECAIs | Joint Committee | Consultation Paper | PDF 157.22 KB |
The Joint Committee of the three European Supervisory Authorities (EBA, ESMA and EIOPA - ESAs) published today an addendum to the joint consultation on the mapping of the credit assessments to risk weights of External Credit Assessment Institutions (ECAIs). The addendum provides further details on the application of the rules proposed in the draft Implementing Technical Standards (ITS) in relation to particular ECAIs and is to be considered as an extension of the consultation process. The consultation period will be reopened until 30 November 2014 in order to collect additional comments. In line with the specifications included in the joint Consultation Paper published in February 2014, this addendum contains the individual mapping tables of all relevant ECAIs. The proposed mappings establish the level of capital that financial institutions should hold in order to ensure the safety and soundness of the EU financial system. These draft mappings are based on the amount of objective information available for each ECAI regarding the performance of its credit ratings. Therefore, the draft mappings mainly reflect the historical ability of ECAIs to anticipate negative credit events. For those cases where only a small number of credit ratings were available, the draft mappings have to a large extent relied on alternative information; whereas, when no relevant information was found, a certain degree of prudence has been applied. Furthermore, the addendum contains some additional aspects resulting from the cost-benefit/impact assessment analysis. The analysis shows that the proposals for the largest ECAIs are not expected to have a significant impact on financial institutions in terms of capital requirements. Only in very specific cases the average capital requirement associated with a particular ECAI might increase by up to 10%. In the case of ECAIs that currently have no mapping established, the impact is expected to reflect the true risk profile of the rated entities. In addition, the EBA also published the individual draft mapping reports that illustrate how the rules proposed in the draft ITS were applied. The draft mappings will be reviewed in light of any comments received during the consultation process. Consultation process The consultation deadline is 30 November 2014 and responses can be submitted here. All contributions received will be published following the close of the consultation, unless requested otherwise. Draft Mapping Reports | |||
10/11/2014 | 2014/1352 | Consultation Paper on review of the technical standards on reporting under Article 9 of EMIR | Market Integrity | Consultation Paper | PDF 657.07 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has today published a consultation paper on the revision of the Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) and implementing technical standards (ITS) in relation to the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR). The ESMA RTS/ ITS deal with the obligation of counterparties' and CCP's to report to trade repositories. Since the entry into force of the RTS and ITS, ESMA has worked on ensuring their consistent application. The practical implementation of EMIR reporting showed some shortcomings and highlighted particular instances for improvements so that the EMIR reports better fulfil their objectives. ESMA revised standards propose to clarify the interpretation of the data fields needed for the reporting to trade repositories and the most appropriate way of populating them. ESMA will consider stakeholder's feedback to the proposed revised standards by 13 February 2015. | |||
17/11/2014 | JC/DP/2014/02 | Discussion Paper- Key Information Documents for Packaged Retail and Insurance-based Investment Products (PRIIPs) | Fund Management, Joint Committee | Consultation Paper | PDF 1.38 MB |
EBA, EIOPA, and ESMA (the ESAs) welcome comments on this Discussion Paper on Key Information Documents for Packaged Retail and Insurance-based Investment Products (PRIIPs).Comments can be sent by clicking on the ‘input’ button on the consultation page of one of the ESA’s websites. Please note that the deadline for the submission of comments is 17 February 2015. Comments submitted after this deadline, or submitted via other means may not be processed. It is important to note that although you may not be able to respond to each and every question, the ESAs would encourage partial responses from stakeholders on those questions that they believe are most relevant to them.Publication of responsesAll contributions received will be published following the close of the consultation, unless you request otherwise in the consultation form. A confidential response may be requested from us in accordance with the ESA’s rules on public access to documents.1 We may consult you if we receive such a request. Any decision we make not to disclose the response is reviewable by the Board of Appeal of the ESA’s and the European Ombudsman.Data protectionInformation on data protection can be found at the different ESA’s websites under the heading ‘Legal notice' | |||
19/12/2014 | 2014/1566 | Draft Regulatory Technical Standards on European Electronic Access Point (EEAP) | Transparency | Consultation Paper | PDF 2.17 MB |
Responding to this paper ESMA invites comments on all matters in this paper and in particular on the specific questions summarised in Annex III. Comments are most helpful if they:1. respond to the question stated;2. indicate the specific question to which the comment relates;3. contain a clear rationale; and4. describe any alternatives ESMA should consider. In order to respond to this paper, please follow the instructions given in the document ‘Reply form for the EEAP Consultation Paper’ also published on the ESMA website. ESMA will consider all comments received by 30 March 2015. All contributions should be submitted online at www.esma.europa.eu under the heading ‘Your input - Consultations’. Publication of responses All contributions received will be published following the close of the consultation, unless you request otherwise. Please clearly and prominently indicate in your submission any part you do not wish to be publically disclosed. A standard confidentiality statement in an email message will not be treated as a request for non-disclosure. A confidential response may be requested from us in accordance with ESMA’s rules on access to documents. We may consult you if we receive such a request. Any decision we make not to disclose the response is reviewable by ESMA’s Board of Appeal and the European Ombudsman. Data protection Information on data protection can be found at www.esma.europa.eu under the heading Legal Notice. Who should read this paper In particular, comments are sought from issuers, officially appointed mechanisms, investors, users of regulated information and stakeholders at large who are affected by Directive 2004/109/EC of December 2004 as amended by Directive 2013/50/EC. |