ESMA LIBRARY
The ESMA Library contains all ESMA documents. Please use the search and filter options to find specific documents.
46
REFINE YOUR SEARCH
Sections
- (-) Remove Board of Appeal filter Board of Appeal
- (-) Remove Board of Supervisors filter Board of Supervisors
- (-) Remove Joint Committee filter Joint Committee
- (-) Remove Fund Management filter Fund Management
- (-) Remove Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group filter Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group
- (-) Remove Careers filter Careers
- (-) Remove Innovation and Products filter Innovation and Products
- Credit Rating Agencies (33) Apply Credit Rating Agencies filter
- Post Trading (16) Apply Post Trading filter
- Management Board (12) Apply Management Board filter
- Short Selling (9) Apply Short Selling filter
- Market Integrity (7) Apply Market Integrity filter
- MiFID - Investor Protection (7) Apply MiFID - Investor Protection filter
- Corporate Information (6) Apply Corporate Information filter
- COVID-19 (5) Apply COVID-19 filter
- MiFID - Secondary Markets (5) Apply MiFID - Secondary Markets filter
- Trade Repositories (4) Apply Trade Repositories filter
- Corporate Disclosure (3) Apply Corporate Disclosure filter
- Prospectus (3) Apply Prospectus filter
- Supervisory convergence (2) Apply Supervisory convergence filter
- CESR Archive (1) Apply CESR Archive filter
- Market Abuse (1) Apply Market Abuse filter
- Press Releases (1) Apply Press Releases filter
- Procurement (1) Apply Procurement filter
- Securitisation (1) Apply Securitisation filter
- Trading (1) Apply Trading filter
Type of document
- (-) Remove Decision filter Decision
- (-) Remove Technical Advice filter Technical Advice
- Reference (276) Apply Reference filter
- Guidelines & Recommendations (185) Apply Guidelines & Recommendations filter
- Letter (135) Apply Letter filter
- Summary of Conclusions (135) Apply Summary of Conclusions filter
- Press Release (126) Apply Press Release filter
- SMSG Advice (89) Apply SMSG Advice filter
- Report (65) Apply Report filter
- Consultation Paper (63) Apply Consultation Paper filter
- Final Report (60) Apply Final Report filter
- Statement (52) Apply Statement filter
- Speech (50) Apply Speech filter
- Opinion (19) Apply Opinion filter
- Compliance table (17) Apply Compliance table filter
- Q&A (13) Apply Q&A filter
- Annual Report (9) Apply Annual Report filter
- Technical Standards (6) Apply Technical Standards filter
- Investor Warning (2) Apply Investor Warning filter
- CESR Document (1) Apply CESR Document filter
Your filters
Board of Supervisors X IAS Regulation X Careers X Sustainable finance X Board of Appeal X Fund Management X Innovation and Products X Joint Committee X Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group X Technical Advice X Decision X
Reset all filtersDate | Ref. | Title | Section | Type | Download | Info | Summary | Related Documents | Translated versions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
17/05/2011 | 2011/BS/123 | Decision of the Board of Supervisors- Appointment of the Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group | Board of Supervisors, Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group | Decision | PDF 171.3 KB |
||||
16/11/2011 | 2011/379 | Final report- ESMA's technical advice to the European Commission on possible implementing measures of the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive | Fund Management | Technical Advice | PDF 3.51 MB |
||||
19/12/2011 | 2011/BS/229 | Decision of the European Securities and Markets Authority establishing its Review Panel | Board of Supervisors, Corporate Information, Supervisory convergence | Decision | PDF 35.86 KB |
This decision establishes the Review Panel of ESMA and sets out its mandate. | |||
24/06/2013 | BoA 2013-008 | Board of Appeal Decision | Joint Committee, Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 242.72 KB |
The joint Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities (EBA, ESMA and EIOPA) has published today its decision in an appeal brought by an Estonian company against a decision of the EBA. It concerned the question whether the suitability of the managers of a significant branch of a bank may be a matter within EU law, and not just national law. Allowing the appeal, the Board of Appeal interpreted Directive No. 2006/48/EC consistently with the EBA Guidelines on the assessment of the suitability of members of the management body and key function holders. It came to the conclusion that the “fit and proper” requirement is not restricted to the persons who direct the business of the credit institution. The matter therefore was within the EBA’s powers of investigation. Although the appellant criticised the way in which the EBA dealt with its complaint, the Board of Appeal made it clear that it did not accept that criticism. It considered that the EBA dealt with the complaint in an appropriate manner. The ground on which the appeal was allowed was one of interpretation of the applicable legal provisions. The case was remitted to the EBA to adopt the appropriate decision in accordance with the Board of Appeal’s findings. This is for information only. The decision consists of the signed Decision only. For any enquiries, please contact EIOPA’s Press Office: Anzhelika Mayer Tel.: +49 69 9511 1968 | |||
13/01/2014 | BoA 2013-014 | Board of Appeal Decision Global Private Rating Company v. ESMA | Joint Committee, Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 361.96 KB |
Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities dismisses appeal made by a refused CRA-applicant against ESMA On 10 January 2014, the Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities handed down its decision on an appeal by the appellant, Global Private Rating Company “Standard Rating” Ltd, against the refusal by the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) to register it as a credit rating agency. This is the first appeal against a decision by ESMA refusing an applicant registration as a credit rating agency. The Board of Appeal unanimously decided that the appeal should be dismissed, and that ESMA’s refusal decision should be confirmed. It stated that it accepted the appellant’s point that the registration of a credit rating agency by ESMA is a new process, and recognised that the procedures will to an extent take time fully to work out. Nevertheless, because of the responsibilities placed on credit rating agencies and their importance in the financial system generally, it considered that the onus must be on an applicant to satisfy ESMA that the relevant requirements are met. The application and its contents must be very clear, and it is not ESMA’s responsibility as regulator to remedy deficiencies. | |||
27/03/2014 | 2014/312 | Technical advice to the European Commission on the information that competent authorities should provide to ESMA pursuant to Article 67(3) of the AIFMD | Fund Management | Technical Advice | PDF 330.79 KB |
Reasons for publication ESMA is issuing this technical advice in response to the mandate received from the European Commission on 20 December 2013 for advice on the possible content of the delegated act required by Article 67(5) of the AIFMD, concerning the information that EU competent authorities have to provide quarterly to ESMA pursuant to Article 67(3) of the Directive. This information is needed in order to allow ESMA to produce the opinion and the advice required in Article 67(1) of the AIFMD, in relation to the possible extension of the AIFMD passport to non-EU AIFs and non-EU AIFMs. Contents Section II describes the background of the proposal. Section III specifies the timing for the provision of the information to ESMA and lists the information that the competent authorities should provide quarterly to ESMA. The list of information is divided into three parts: the first refers to the information about the functioning of the passport for EU AIFMs; the second deals with the functioning of the national private placement regime for non-EU AIFs and non-EU AIFMs; and the third refers to the issues arising from the functioning of both systems. Finally, Section IV reproduces the mandate for advice issued by the European Commission. Next steps ESMA will cooperate closely with the European Commission in order to facilitate an expeditious adoption of the delegated act required by Article 67(5) of the AIFMD. | |||
17/07/2014 | 2014/C1/02 | Board of Appeal Decision | Joint Committee, Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 368.94 KB |
The Joint Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities (the European Banking Authority, the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority and the European Securities and Markets Authority) published its decision in an appeal brought by SV Capital OÜ, an Estonian company, against a decision of the EBA. This was the second appeal to be considered by the Board of Appeal in this matter between the same parties concerning the question whether the suitability of the managers of a significant branch of a bank raised a question of Union law. Following the Board of Appeal’s affirmative decision of 24 June 2013, the appellant requested the EBA to initiate an investigation against the Estonian and Finnish Financial Supervision Authorities because their alleged failure to take action in respect of individuals in the Estonian branch of Nordea Bank Finland PLC whom it was alleged were not fit and proper persons to be key function holders in the bank. The EBA decided that it would not initiate an investigation. The Board of Appeal decided that the EBA had been right to raise the matter with the national supervisors, but that having done so, it was entitled to take no further action in the light of their responses. The Board accordingly dismissed the appellant’s appeal against the EBA’s decision. | |||
28/11/2014 | 2014/1417 | ESMA's technical advice to the European Commission on delegated acts required by the UCITS V Directive | Fund Management | Technical Advice | PDF 469.49 KB |
||||
02/12/2014 | 2014/BOA/05 | Decision by the ESA BoA concerning Investor Protection Europe sprl | Joint Committee, Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 229.85 KB |
The Joint Board of Appeal of the ESAs decides on the inadmissibility of an appeal brought by IPE sprl, a company based in Brussels, against a decision by ESMAThe Joint Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities published today its decision in an appeal brought by Investor Protection Europe (IPE) sprl, a company based in Brussels, against a decision of the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) of 10 June 2014 not to initiate an investigation under Article 17 of the ESMA Regulation regarding an alleged breach of Union law by the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier of Luxembourg. The Board of Appeal unanimously decided that the appeal was inadmissible, and in the light of that decision, did not consider the substance of IPE’s complaint. | |||
28/01/2015 | 2014/SMSG/002 | Decision- Rules of procedure of the Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group | Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group | Decision | PDF 131.88 KB |
||||
16/02/2015 | 2015/227 | Final Report- ESMA’s technical advice to the European Commission on the delegated acts of the Regulations on European Social Entrepreneurship Funds and European Venture Capital Funds | Fund Management | Technical Advice | PDF 609.09 KB |
||||
30/07/2015 | 2015/1236 | ESMA's advice to the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on the application of the AIFMD passport to non-EU AIFMs and AIFs | Fund Management | Technical Advice | PDF 1.36 MB |
Executive summary Reasons for publication In accordance with Articles 36 and 42 of the Directive 2011/61/EU on Alternative Investment Fund Managers (AIFMD), non-EU alternative investment fund managers (AIFMs) and non-EU alternative investment funds (AIFs) managed by EU AIFMs are subject to the national private placement regime (NPPR) of each of the Member States where the AIFs are marketed or managed. However, the AIFMD makes provision for the passport, which is currently reserved to EU AIFMs and AIFs, to be potentially extended in future. Article 67(1) of the AIFMD establishes that, by 22 July 2015, ESMA shall issue to the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission advice on the application of the passport to non-EU AIFMs and AIFs in accordance with the rules set out in Article 35 and 37 to 41 of the AIFMD. This document sets out ESMA’s advice on the application of the passport to six non-EU countries: Guernsey, Hong Kong, Jersey, Switzerland, Singapore and the United States. Contents Section 1 of the advice sets out the background to ESMA’s work, while the detailed assessment of each of the aforementioned non-EU countries is contained in section 2. Annexes 1 to 7 contain a summary of the feedback to the call for evidence that ESMA launched in November 2014. Annex 8 gives a detailed breakdown by non-EU country of the number of non-EU AIFs and non-EU AIFMs active in Member States in accordance with Articles 36 and 42 of the AIFMD. Next Steps ESMA will continue to work on its assessment of other non-EU countries not covered in this advice with a view to delivering further submissions to the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission in the coming months. For those non-EU jurisdictions with which there are currently no supervisory cooperation arrangements in place for the purposes of the AIFMD, ESMA will continue its efforts to agree a MoU with the authorities concerned. | |||
14/08/2015 | BOA/2015/001 | Decision of the Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities given under Article 60 of Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010 and the Board of Appeal’s Rules of Procedure (BOA 2012 002) | Joint Committee, Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 147.78 KB |
||||
26/01/2016 | BOA 2016 001 | BoA 2016- 001 (Decision Kluge v EBA) | Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 196.32 KB |
||||
12/09/2016 | 2016/1140 | Final advice on AIFMD passport | Fund Management | Technical Advice | PDF 621.95 KB |
This version of the advice includes the following clarifications with respect to the assessment of the Isle of Man:
|
|||
01/06/2017 | ESMA41-137-1005 | Decision of the Board of Supervisors to adopt a supervisory measure and impose fines with respect to infringements by Moody’s Deutschland GmbH and Moody’s Investors Service Limited | Board of Supervisors, Credit Rating Agencies | Decision | PDF 207.16 KB |
||||
20/07/2017 | BoA 2017 01 | FinancialCraft Analytics Sp. z o.o. vs ESMA BoA Decision | Board of Appeal, Credit Rating Agencies | Decision | PDF 693 KB |
||||
30/04/2018 | BoA 2018-01 | Decision in an appeal by A v ESMA | Board of Appeal, Joint Committee | Decision | PDF 392.62 KB |
||||
26/09/2018 | BoA D 2018 02 | Decision in an Appeal by B. against a decision of the European Securities and Markets Authority | Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 382.53 KB |
||||
11/10/2018 | ESMA70-155-5775 | Delegation third country TV post trade transparency | Board of Supervisors, MiFID - Secondary Markets | Decision | PDF 219.76 KB |