ESMA LIBRARY
The ESMA Library contains all ESMA documents. Please use the search and filter options to find specific documents.
78
REFINE YOUR SEARCH
Sections
- (-) Remove Fund Management filter Fund Management
- (-) Remove Innovation and Products filter Innovation and Products
- (-) Remove Trade Repositories filter Trade Repositories
- (-) Remove Corporate Finance filter Corporate Finance
- CESR Archive (292) Apply CESR Archive filter
- MiFID - Secondary Markets (122) Apply MiFID - Secondary Markets filter
- MiFID - Investor Protection (99) Apply MiFID - Investor Protection filter
- Post Trading (77) Apply Post Trading filter
- Guidelines and Technical standards (44) Apply Guidelines and Technical standards filter
- Market Integrity (43) Apply Market Integrity filter
- Short Selling (40) Apply Short Selling filter
- Credit Rating Agencies (31) Apply Credit Rating Agencies filter
- Joint Committee (31) Apply Joint Committee filter
- Corporate Disclosure (24) Apply Corporate Disclosure filter
- Market Abuse (23) Apply Market Abuse filter
- CCP Directorate (22) Apply CCP Directorate filter
- Prospectus (19) Apply Prospectus filter
- Benchmarks (13) Apply Benchmarks filter
- COVID-19 (13) Apply COVID-19 filter
- Securitisation (11) Apply Securitisation filter
- Trading (11) Apply Trading filter
- Supervisory convergence (10) Apply Supervisory convergence filter
- Transparency (7) Apply Transparency filter
- IFRS Supervisory Convergence (5) Apply IFRS Supervisory Convergence filter
- Brexit (4) Apply Brexit filter
- Market data (4) Apply Market data filter
- Securities Financing Transactions (4) Apply Securities Financing Transactions filter
- Corporate Governance (3) Apply Corporate Governance filter
- Corporate Information (2) Apply Corporate Information filter
- Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors (2) Apply Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors filter
- Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group (2) Apply Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group filter
- Sustainable finance (2) Apply Sustainable finance filter
- Board of Supervisors (1) Apply Board of Supervisors filter
- Crowdfunding (1) Apply Crowdfunding filter
- European Single Electronic Format (1) Apply European Single Electronic Format filter
- MiFID II: Transparency Calculations and DVC (1) Apply MiFID II: Transparency Calculations and DVC filter
- Warnings and publications for investors (1) Apply Warnings and publications for investors filter
Type of document
- (-) Remove Consultation Paper filter Consultation Paper
- (-) Remove Compliance table filter Compliance table
- (-) Remove Opinion filter Opinion
- Reference (111) Apply Reference filter
- Guidelines & Recommendations (109) Apply Guidelines & Recommendations filter
- Press Release (66) Apply Press Release filter
- Speech (45) Apply Speech filter
- Letter (44) Apply Letter filter
- Report (37) Apply Report filter
- Final Report (32) Apply Final Report filter
- Statement (31) Apply Statement filter
- Q&A (11) Apply Q&A filter
- Technical Advice (8) Apply Technical Advice filter
- Decision (4) Apply Decision filter
- Technical Standards (4) Apply Technical Standards filter
- Annual Report (2) Apply Annual Report filter
- Investor Warning (1) Apply Investor Warning filter
- SMSG Advice (1) Apply SMSG Advice filter
Your filters
Audit X Corporate Finance X Innovation and Products X Trade Repositories X Fund Management X CESR Document X Opinion X Compliance table X Consultation Paper X
Reset all filtersDate | Ref. | Title | Section | Type | Download | Info | Summary | Related Documents | Translated versions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
15/04/2011 | 2011/121 | Discussion paper- ESMA’s policy orientations on possible implementing measures under Article 3 of the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive | Fund Management | Consultation Paper | PDF 186.38 KB |
||||
13/07/2011 | 2011/209 | Consultation paper- ESMA's draft technical advice to the European Commission on possible implementing measures of the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive | Fund Management | Consultation Paper | PDF 2.82 MB |
||||
22/07/2011 | 2011/220 | Discussion paper- ESMA’s policy orientations on guidelines for UCITS Exchange-Traded Funds and Structured UCITS | Fund Management | Consultation Paper | PDF 211.79 KB |
||||
23/08/2011 | 2011/270 | Consultation paper- ESMA's draft technical advice to the European Commission on possible implementing measures of the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive in relation to supervision and third countries | Fund Management | Consultation Paper | PDF 154.97 KB |
||||
13/10/2011 | 2011/342 | Opinion- Practical arrangements for the late transposition of the UCITS IV Directive | Fund Management | Opinion | PDF 41.33 KB |
||||
30/01/2012 | 2012/44 | ESMA’s guidelines on ETFs and other UCITS issues | Fund Management | Consultation Paper | PDF 420.17 KB |
In the summer of 2010 ESMA started looking into the operation of UCITS making use of the new investment freedoms introduced by the UCITS III Directive and the Eligible Assets Directive (2007/16/EC) in order to identify the possible impact on investor protection and market integrity. As part of this work, ESMA published a discussion paper on policy orientations on guidelines for UCITS Exchange-Traded Funds and Structured UCITS on 22 July 2011 (ESMA/2011/220), responses to which were due by 22 September. This consultation paper represents the next stage in the development of ESMA guidelines in this area. ESMA will take into account responses to this consultation paper in finalising the guidelines for adoption in Q2 2012. | |||
23/02/2012 | 2012/117 | Discussion paper on Key concepts of the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive and types of AIFM | Fund Management | Consultation Paper | PDF 359.52 KB |
This document will be of interest to asset management companies and trade associations of asset management companies managing funds falling in the scope of the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive. Responses to this discussion paper will help ESMA in finalising its policy approach. In light of the feedback received, ESMA will develop a consultation paper in Q2 2012 setting out formal proposals for draft regulatory technical standards on Article 4(4) of the AIFMD. The results of that public consultation will be used by ESMA in finalising the draft regulatory technical standards to be submitted to the European Commission for endorsement by the end of 2012. | |||
28/06/2012 | 2012/406 | Draft Guidelines on sound remuneration policies under the AIFMD | Fund Management | Consultation Paper | PDF 1.03 MB |
Annex II of the AIFMD establishes a set of rules (largely inspired from the provisions of Directive 2006/48/EC, the “CRD”) with which AIFMs have to comply when establishing and applying the remuneration policies for certain categories of their staff. Article 13(2) of the AIFMD requires ESMA to develop guidelines on sound remuneration policies which comply with Annex II of the AIFMD. This consultation paper represents the first step in the elaboration of the guidelines on remuneration policies required by the AIFMD and sets out ESMA’s formal proposals for these guidelines.Responses to this consultation paper will be taken into account by ESMA in finalising the guidelines on sound remuneration policies under the AIFMD. In finalising the guidelines, ESMA will also take into account the development of its work on the separate set of guidelines, which will be complementary to the CEBS Guidelines, focused on remuneration policies of investment firms from an investor protection point of view, for which a separate consultation paper will be published at the end of Q3 2012. ESMA aims to adopt the final text of the guidelines on sound remuneration policies under the AIFMD in Q4 2012. | |||
20/11/2012 | 2012/721 | Opinion on Article 50(2)(a) of the UCITS Directive | Fund Management | Opinion | PDF 81.31 KB |
||||
19/12/2012 | 2012/844 | Draft regulatory technical standards on types of AIFMs | Fund Management | Consultation Paper | PDF 826.57 KB |
||||
19/12/2012 | 2012/845 | Guidelines on key concepts of the AIFMD | Fund Management | Consultation Paper | PDF 698.69 KB |
||||
24/05/2013 | 2013/599 | AIFM reporting XSD schema and samples | Fund Management | Consultation Paper | ZIP 29.41 KB |
The CP setting out draft ESMA’s guidelines on reporting obligations under Articles 3 and 24 of the AIFMD (ESMA/2013/592) is supplemented by AIFM reporting XSD schema and samples that AIFMs will have to use to report the information under Articles 3 and 24 to their national competent authorities. ESMA is also seeking feedback from stakeholders on these documents | |||
24/05/2013 | 2013/592 | Consultation paper on ESMA’s guidelines on AIFMD reporting obligations under Articles 3 and 24 of the AIFMD | Fund Management | Consultation Paper | PDF 973.51 KB |
Consultation paper on ESMA’s guidelines on AIFMD reporting obligations under Articles 3 and 24 of the AIFMD ESMA’s consultation paper (CP) on AIFMD reporting obligations contains in draft guidelines to national competent authorities (NCAs) for securities markets on reporting obligations for AIFMs under Articles 3 and 24 of the AIFMD. These draft guidelines, set out in Annex III, provide clarification on the information that AIFMs should report to NCAs, the timing of such reporting together with the procedures to be followed when AIFMs move from one reporting obligation to another. Annex IV of the CP includes the reporting template set out in Regulation 231/2013. Annex V sets out a diagram which summarises the reporting obligations of AIFMs, as determined by the total value of assets under management and the nature of the AIFs managed or marketed. Annex VI provides stakeholders with detailed IT guidance for XML filing. The CP is accompanied by the publication of the AIFM reporting XSD schema (ESMA/2013/599) that AIFMs will have to use to report the information under Articles 3 and 24 to NCAs and on which ESMA is also seeking feedback from stakeholders. | |||
01/08/2013 | 2013/1072 | Practical arrangements for the late transposition of the AIFMD | Fund Management | Opinion | PDF 93.1 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has published an Opinion on arrangements for the late imposition of the AIFMD. The scope of the opinion is confined to the provision of collective portfolio management services. Arrangements before implementation of the Directive in all Member States Notification of marketing of EU AIFs when the host MS of the AIFM has not transposed the Directive (Articles 31 and 32 of the Directive) ESMA believes that, if the Directive has been transposed in the home MS of the AIFM, the competent authority of the host MS of the AIFM (Article 32) or home MS of the AIFM (Article 31) may not refuse a valid notification under the Directive on the ground that the Directive has not yet been transposed in the host MS. This applies irrespective of whether the marketing is done using the freedom to provide services or by means of a branch. Management passport (Article 33 of the Directive) ESMA believes that AIFMs established in a MS that has transposed the Directive should be able to manage an EU AIF via the management passport, both using the freedom to provide services or by means of a branch, in a MS where the Directive has not been transposed, irrespective of the provisions currently in place in such jurisdiction since the relevant provisions of the Directive are of a self-executing nature, and provided the AIFM is authorised to manage that type of AIF in accordance with Article 33(1) of the AIFMD. Any local restrictions on AIFMs that are not in accordance with the AIFMD will need to be disapplied. | |||
20/12/2013 | 2013/1974 | Revision of the provisions on diversification of collateral in ESMA’s guidelines on ETFs and other UCITS issues | Fund Management | Consultation Paper | PDF 202.22 KB |
||||
27/03/2014 | 2014/332 | Structured Retail Products- Good practices for product governance arrangements | MiFID - Investor Protection, Innovation and Products | Opinion | PDF 203.1 KB |
Legal basis 1. Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 (ESMA Regulation) sets out the European Securities and Markets Authority’s (ESMA) scope of action, tasks and powers which include “enhancing customer protection”, and “foster[ing] investor protection”. 2. In order to continue delivering on this investor protection statutory objective, ESMA is issuing this opinion on certain aspects linked to the manufacturing and distribution of structured retail products (SRP). This opinion takes into account relevant work done in this field both at European and interna-tional level. 3. This opinion is without prejudice to the requirements for the provision of investment services and activities established in the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) and its implementing measures (notably, Directive 2006/73/EC), the regulatory developments arising from the MiFID review or existing product rules that may apply to SRPs. 4. ESMA’s competence to deliver an opinion is based on Article 29(1) (a) of the ESMA Regulation. In accordance with Article 44(1) of the ESMA Regulation, the Board of Supervisors has adopted this opinion. Background 5. In its July 2013 report on ‘Retailisation in the EU’ , ESMA highlighted that, from a consumer protec-tion perspective, retail investors may face difficulties in understanding the drivers of risks and returns of structured products. If retail investors do not properly understand the risk and reward profile of structured products, and if the products are not properly assessed against the risk appetite of retail investors, retail investors might be exposed to unexpected losses and this might lead to complaints, reputational risks for manufacturers and distributors, and a loss of confidence in the regulatory framework and, more broadly, in financial markets. 6. In 2013, ESMA mapped the measures adopted in the EU Member States in relation to complex products in order to identify issues and to better understand the rationale behind national initiatives (by looking at similarities and differences in the various approaches, and reviewing how complexity has been treated in the different EU Members States). 7. As a result, ESMA has developed a broad set of non-exhaustive examples of good practices, attached as Annex 1 hereto, illustrating arrangements that firms - taking into account the nature, scale and complexity of their business - could put in place to improve their ability to deliver on investor protection regarding, in particular, (i) the complexity of the SRPs they manufacture or distribute, (ii) the nature and range of the investment services and activities undertaken in the course of that business, and (iii) the type of investors they target. These good practices should also be a helpful tool for competent authorities in carrying out their supervisory action. Opinion 8. ESMA considers that sound product governance arrangements are fundamental for investor protec-tion purposes, and can reduce the need for product intervention actions by competent authorities. 9. ESMA considers that, when supervising firms manufacturing or distributing an SRP, competent authorities should promote, in their supervisory approaches, the examples of good practices for firms set out in Annex 1 hereto. 10. Although the good practices set out in Annex 1 hereto focus on structured products sold to retail investors, ESMA considers that they may also be a relevant reference for other types of financial in-struments (such as asset-backed securities, or contingent convertible bonds), as well as when financial instruments are being sold to professional clients. 11. The exposure to risk is an intrinsic feature of investment products. The good practices set out in Annex 1 refer to product governance arrangements and do not (and cannot) aim at removing investment risk from products. | |||
22/07/2014 | 2014/876 | Discussion paper- Calculation of counterparty risk by UCITS for OTC financial derivative transactions subject to clearing obligations | Fund Management | Consultation Paper | PDF 305.08 KB |
||||
26/09/2014 | 2014/1182 | Consultation paper on the implementing measures of the Regulations on EuSEF and EuVECA | Fund Management | Consultation Paper | PDF 635.29 KB |
Who should read this paper This consultation paper is addressed to social entrepreneurs, impact investors, EuSEF and EuVECA managers, impact fund managers, business angels, venture capitalists and other relevant stakeholders and their associations in the area of social entrepreneurship and venture capital in the EU. Responding to this paper ESMA invites comments on all matters in this paper and in particular on the specific questions summarised in Annex 1. Comments are most helpful if they:• respond to the question stated;• indicate the specific question to which the comment relates;• contain a clear rationale; and• describe any alternatives ESMA should consider. ESMA will consider all comments received by 10 December 2014. All contributions should be submitted online at www.esma.europa.eu under the heading ‘Your input - Consultations’. Publication of responses All contributions received will be published following the close of the consultation, unless you request otherwise. Please clearly and prominently indicate in your submission any part you do not wish to be publically disclosed. A standard confidentiality statement in an email message will not be treated as a request for non-disclosure. A confidential response may be requested from us in accordance with ESMA’s rules on access to documents. We may consult you if we receive such a request. Any decision we make not to disclose the response is reviewable by ESMA’s Board of Appeal and the European Ombudsman. Data protection Information on data protection can be found at www.esma.europa.eu under the heading ‘Legal Notice’. | |||
26/09/2014 | 2014/1183 | Consultation paper on ESMA's technical advice to the European Commission on delegated acts required by the UCITS V Directive | Fund Management | Consultation Paper | PDF 734.97 KB |
Who should read this paper This document will be of interest to depositaries (including their delegates) of UCITS funds and their trade associations, asset management companies managing UCITS funds and their trade associations, as well as institutional and retail investors investing into such funds and their associations. Responding to this paper ESMA invites comments on all matters in this paper and in particular on the specific questions summarised in Annex 1. Comments are most helpful if they:• respond to the question stated;• indicate the specific question to which the comment relates;• contain a clear rationale; and• describe any alternatives ESMA should consider. ESMA will consider all comments received by 24 October 2014. All contributions should be submitted online at www.esma.europa.eu under the heading ‘Your input - Consultations’. Publication of responses All contributions received will be published following the close of the consultation, unless you request otherwise. Please clearly and prominently indicate in your submission any part you do not wish to be publically disclosed. A standard confidentiality statement in an email message will not be treated as a request for non-disclosure. A confidential response may be requested from us in accordance with ESMA’s rules on access to documents. We may consult you if we receive such a request. Any decision we make not to disclose the response is reviewable by ESMA’s Board of Appeal and the European Ombudsman. Data protection Information on data protection can be found at www.esma.europa.eu under the heading ‘Legal Notice’. | |||
07/11/2014 | 2014/1340 | Call for evidence on AIFMD passport and third country AIFMs | Fund Management | Consultation Paper | PDF 317.57 KB |