ESMA LIBRARY
REFINE YOUR SEARCH
Sections
- (-) Remove Corporate Disclosure filter Corporate Disclosure
- (-) Remove Corporate Information filter Corporate Information
- (-) Remove Innovation and Products filter Innovation and Products
- (-) Remove Market Abuse filter Market Abuse
- (-) Remove Corporate Finance filter Corporate Finance
- (-) Remove Audit filter Audit
- CESR Archive (115) Apply CESR Archive filter
- Board of Supervisors (107) Apply Board of Supervisors filter
- Management Board (51) Apply Management Board filter
- Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group (43) Apply Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group filter
- Guidelines and Technical standards (42) Apply Guidelines and Technical standards filter
- Post Trading (38) Apply Post Trading filter
- Brexit (31) Apply Brexit filter
- MiFID - Investor Protection (31) Apply MiFID - Investor Protection filter
- MiFID - Secondary Markets (30) Apply MiFID - Secondary Markets filter
- Fund Management (28) Apply Fund Management filter
- Joint Committee (28) Apply Joint Committee filter
- Press Releases (22) Apply Press Releases filter
- COVID-19 (18) Apply COVID-19 filter
- IFRS Supervisory Convergence (18) Apply IFRS Supervisory Convergence filter
- Credit Rating Agencies (17) Apply Credit Rating Agencies filter
- Market Integrity (16) Apply Market Integrity filter
- Benchmarks (12) Apply Benchmarks filter
- Prospectus (8) Apply Prospectus filter
- MiFID II: Transparency Calculations and DVC (7) Apply MiFID II: Transparency Calculations and DVC filter
- Supervisory convergence (7) Apply Supervisory convergence filter
- Trade Repositories (7) Apply Trade Repositories filter
- CCP Directorate (6) Apply CCP Directorate filter
- Securities Financing Transactions (5) Apply Securities Financing Transactions filter
- Short Selling (5) Apply Short Selling filter
- Sustainable finance (5) Apply Sustainable finance filter
- Warnings and publications for investors (5) Apply Warnings and publications for investors filter
- Corporate Governance (4) Apply Corporate Governance filter
- IAS Regulation (4) Apply IAS Regulation filter
- Speeches (4) Apply Speeches filter
- Transparency (4) Apply Transparency filter
- Trading (3) Apply Trading filter
- Market data (2) Apply Market data filter
- Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors (2) Apply Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors filter
- International cooperation (1) Apply International cooperation filter
- Securitisation (1) Apply Securitisation filter
Type of document
- (-) Remove Statement filter Statement
- (-) Remove Compliance table filter Compliance table
- (-) Remove CESR Document filter CESR Document
- (-) Remove Summary of Conclusions filter Summary of Conclusions
- Letter (208) Apply Letter filter
- Reference (184) Apply Reference filter
- Annual Report (81) Apply Annual Report filter
- Press Release (72) Apply Press Release filter
- Final Report (47) Apply Final Report filter
- Report (44) Apply Report filter
- Speech (38) Apply Speech filter
- Consultation Paper (33) Apply Consultation Paper filter
- Opinion (16) Apply Opinion filter
- Guidelines & Recommendations (11) Apply Guidelines & Recommendations filter
- Q&A (7) Apply Q&A filter
- Decision (6) Apply Decision filter
- Technical Advice (6) Apply Technical Advice filter
- Technical Standards (4) Apply Technical Standards filter
- Investor Warning (2) Apply Investor Warning filter
- Vacancy (2) Apply Vacancy filter
- SMSG Advice (1) Apply SMSG Advice filter
Date | Ref. | Title | Section | Type | Download | Info | Summary | Related Documents | Translated versions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
15/05/2009 | 09-220 | Feedback statement- MAD Level 3 – Third set of CESR guidance and information on the common operation of the Directive to the market | Market Abuse | CESR Document | PDF 238.16 KB |
||||
10/03/2011 | 2011/11 | Public statement of consultation practices | Corporate Information | Statement | PDF 102.44 KB |
||||
23/03/2011 | 2011/67 | Feedback statement- Consultation Paper on proposed amendments to CESR | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | CESR Document | PDF 384.63 KB |
||||
23/03/2011 | 2011/36 | Public statement- Framework for third country prospectuses under Article 20 of the Prospectus Directive | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Statement | PDF 317.51 KB |
||||
23/03/2011 | 2011/37 | Public statement- ESMA statement on Israeli laws and regulations on prospectuses | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Statement | PDF 187.46 KB |
||||
20/07/2011 | 2011/211 | Public statement- Retrospective Adjustments to Financial Statements Following Rejection Notes Published by the IFRS Interpretations Committee | Corporate Disclosure, IAS Regulation | Statement | PDF 29.57 KB |
||||
28/07/2011 | 2011/226 | Public statement- ESMA Statement on disclosures related to sovereign debt to be included in IFRS financial statements | Corporate Disclosure, IFRS Supervisory Convergence | Statement | PDF 36.9 KB |
||||
25/11/2011 | 2011/397 | Public statement on sovereign debt in IFRS financial statements | Corporate Disclosure, Corporate Governance, IFRS Supervisory Convergence, Press Releases | Statement | PDF 189.46 KB |
||||
29/06/2012 | 2012/415 | Call for Evidence on Empty Voting | Transparency, Corporate Disclosure | CESR Document | PDF 275.66 KB |
ESMA launched a Call for Evidence on Empty Voting in September 2011 to analyse the potential issues and concerns raised by the practice of empty voting and to examine whether there was a possible need for further action. An analysis of the responses received to the consultation has led ESMA to conclude that there is insufficient evidence to justify any regulatory action at the European level at present. | |||
09/11/2012 | 2012/279 | ESMA appoints new chairs to Standing Committees | Corporate Information | Statement | PDF 87.88 KB |
||||
20/12/2012 | 2012/853 | Treatment of Forbearance Practices in IFRS Financial Statements of Financial Institutions | Corporate Disclosure, IFRS Supervisory Convergence | Statement | PDF 220.43 KB |
||||
19/02/2013 | 2013/84 | Feedback statement on the consultation regarding the role of the proxy advisory industry | Corporate Disclosure, Corporate Governance | Statement | PDF 559.31 KB |
||||
20/03/2013 | 2013/318 | Feedback Statement on proposed amendments to the ESMA update of the CESR recommendations for the consistent implementation of the Prospectuses Regulation regarding mineral companies | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure, Transparency | CESR Document | PDF 265.19 KB |
||||
30/09/2013 | ESMA/2013/1363 | Statement by Steven Maijoor, Chair European Securities and Markets Authority, ECON Committee, European Parliament 30 September 2013 | Corporate Information | Statement | PDF 113.71 KB |
Annex to the Statement by Steven Maijoor, Chair of ESMA, to the ECON hearing, 30 September 2013 ESMA/2013/1350 | |||
30/09/2013 | ESMA/2013/1350 | Annex to the Statement by Steven Maijoor, Chair of ESMA, to the ECON hearing, 30 September 2013 | Corporate Information | Statement | PDF 338.74 KB |
Statement by Steven Maijoor, Chair European Securities and Markets Authority, ECON Committee, European Parliament 30 September 2013 ESMA/2013/1363 |
|||
11/11/2013 | 2013/1634 | European common enforcement priorities for 2013 financial statements | Corporate Disclosure, IFRS Supervisory Convergence | Statement | PDF 152.24 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has published its European Common Enforcement Priorities (Priorities) for 2013. These Priorities are to be used by European Economic Area (EEA) national authorities in their assessment of listed companies’ 2013 financial statements. ESMA has defined these Priorities in order to promote the consistent application of IFRS across the EEA. Listed companies and their auditors should take account of the areas set out in the Priorities when preparing and auditing the IFRS financial statements for the year ending 31 December 2013. The Priorities identified refer to the application of IFRS in relation to: • Impairment of non-financial assets; • Measurement and disclosure of post-employment benefit obligations; • Fair value measurement and disclosure; • Disclosures related to significant accounting policies, judgements and estimates; and • Measurement of financial instruments and disclosure of related risks. |
|||
12/11/2013 | 2013/1642 | Information on shareholder cooperation and acting in concert under the Takeover Bids Directive | Corporate Disclosure, Corporate Governance | Statement | PDF 321.63 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has published a statement on practices governed by the Takeover Bid Directive (TBD), focused on shareholder cooperation issues relating to acting in concert and the appointment of board members. The statement contains a White List of activities that shareholders can cooperate on without the presumption of acting in concert. It also contains information on how shareholders may cooperate in order to secure board member appointments by setting out factors that national authorities may take into account when considering whether shareholders are acting in concert. The statement is in response to a request by the European Commission for clarity on these issues, following its 2012 report on the application of the TBD. It is based on information collected about the TBD’s application and common practices across the European Economic Area (EEA). The statement was prepared by the Takeover Bids Network, a permanent working group, under ESMA’s auspices, that promotes the exchange of information on practices and application of the TBD across EEA. | |||
31/07/2014 | 2014/944 | Potential Risks Associated with Investing in Contingent Convertible Instruments | Warnings and publications for investors, Innovation and Products | Statement | PDF 106.1 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) is issuing this statement to clarify to institutional investors risks from a newly emerging asset class referred to by most market participants as contingent convertibles instruments (CoCos). If they work as intended in a crisis CoCos will play an important role to inhibit risk transfer from debt holders to taxpayers. They along with standards to improve the quality and quantity of bank capital reflect a considerate response to the former regulatory capital framework. However, it is unclear as to whether investors fully consider the risks of CoCos and correctly factor those risks into their valuation. ESMA believes there are specific risks to CoCos and that investors should take those risks into consideration prior to investing in these instruments. | |||
23/09/2014 | 2014/1164 | Statement by Steven Maijoor, Chair, European Securities and Markets Authority at the ECON Committee, European Parliament 23 September 2014 | Corporate Information | Statement | PDF 109.53 KB |
Dear Members of the European Parliament, Ladies and gentlemen, First of all, I would like to congratulate you on your election or re-election as a Member of the European Parliament and as a member of this important committee. Call it a “Single Capital Market” or “Capital Market Union”, the financial regulatory reform in the European Union (EU) in the last five years has made solid progress and is a decisive step towards the aim of completing the single market in financial services. This is not only a necessity to tackle failures exposed by the financial crisis, it is also a crucial part of realising the overriding objective of securing economic recovery in the EU. However, it will only reach its full potential if the single rule book is applied consistently and supervised adequately so that all stakeholders can benefit from it in daily practice. ESMA plays a key role in achieving this objective, by enhancing investor protection and by promoting stable and orderly financial markets in the EU. Since its inception three and a half years ago, ESMA has contributed to the creation of an EU single rulebook by developing technical standards and guidelines, and by assisting the European Institutions, and the European Commission in particular, in providing technical advice on such areas as: over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives, hedge funds and private equity, short selling, high frequency trading, Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs), investment advice and financial information. In the last 12 months, ESMA finalised 22 technical standards and pieces of technical advice to the European Commission, as well as seven sets of guidelines, in order to complete the legal framework in areas such as Credit Rating Agencies, prospectuses, market infrastructures, European Social Entrepreneurship Funds and European Venture Capital Funds. We are currently translating the recently agreed MiFID II/MiFIR requirements into practically applicable rules. I will not run through all the work we have done on the single rulebook in that time as you can find an overview and some statistics in the Annex to my Statement which was distributed to you. I would like to stress that throughout the entire policy process we engage as much as possible with all relevant stakeholders – through hearings, direct meetings and consultations. We have – and will continue – to interact with many stakeholder associations representing consumers, investors and market participants - and solicit the views of ESMA’s Securities and Markets Stakeholders Group (SMSG). To mention two examples, right now we are assessing the almost 800 responses we have received to our MiFID II discussion and consultation papers and ESMA has received more than 1500 questions on the implementation of the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR). ESMA has successfully developed a regime of direct supervision at EU level. We supervise 23 credit rating agencies by conducting thematic investigations, on-site visits, analysing the information CRAs provide to the public and by monitoring the implementation of remedial action plans. In June this year, ESMA concluded its first enforcement action and issued a public notice censuring Standard & Poor’s Credit Market Services France SAS and Standard & Poor’s Credit Market Services Europe Limited (S&P) for failing to meet certain organisational requirements. EMIR brings more transparency to derivatives markets by introducing mandatory reporting to trade repositories (TRs). Since November 2013, six repositories have been registered and are now supervised by ESMA. Since reporting under EMIR went live, derivatives trade data has flowed into the repositories: as of 30 June 2014, more than 1 billion new trades have been reported to the TRs. Regulators now have access, or are in the process of establishing access, to derivatives data which should help in providing a clearer picture on the risks associated with those markets. On identifying risks to investor protection and stability, ESMA has substantially improved its data and intelligence gathering capabilities. Risks in securities markets are, for example regularly, identified and reported on in ESMA’s Trend, Risk and Vulnerabilities Report. Concerning the convergence of supervisory practices we have employed a range of instruments, including Q&As, opinions and peer reviews. Regarding peer reviews, we have strengthened our methodology, including the more frequent use of on-site visits. More generally, with the reform of financial markets moving from legislation to implementation, supervisory convergence will become a higher priority in ESMA’s activities and we will increase our resources allocated to this area. That brings me to the last topic I would like to raise, which I also brought to this Committee’s attention last year, the need for a stable budget. Today, our funding comes from a combination of the EU budget, levies on the financial market entities that we supervise directly, and the Member States’ national competent authorities. We are concerned that an increasing budget contribution from national competent authorities might pose undue difficulties to their functioning. This would run counter to the reinforcement of securities markets regulation and supervision at both EU and national level as envisaged in the regulatory reform programme. ESMA’s funding should guarantee its independence and not create potential undue influence. Therefore, we believe that the co-legislators should consider increasing the funding ESMA receives from financial market entities which require ESMA’s intervention and to increase the Union’s share in ESMA’s budget through an independent budget line directly adopted by the co-legislators. Thank you for your attention. | |||
28/10/2014 | 2014/1309 | Public Statement- European common enforcement priorities for 2014 financial statements | Corporate Disclosure, IFRS Supervisory Convergence | Statement | PDF 207.62 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (‘ESMA’) issues this Public Statement which defines the European common enforcement priorities in order to promote consistent application of the International Financial Reporting Standards (‘IFRS’) as indicated in the ESMA Guidelines on enforcement of financial information.As in the previous years, ESMA, together with European national enforcers, identified financial reporting topics which, listed companies and their auditors should particularly consider when preparing and auditing, respectively, the IFRS financial statements for the year ending 31 December 2014. In addition to these common priorities, national enforcers might also set additional enforcement priorities focusing on other relevant topics.ESMA, together with the European national enforcers, will pay particular attention to these common enforcement priorities as well as priorities identified in previous years, when monitoring and assessing the application of all relevant IFRS requirements. National enforcers will continue to focus on material issues in the financial statements that are relevant for an individual issuer under examination. On the basis of examinations performed, national enforcers will take corrective actions whenever material misstatements are identified. ESMA will report on findings regarding these priorities in its Report on the 2015 enforce-ment activities. |