ESMA LIBRARY

The ESMA Library contains all ESMA documents. Please use the search and filter options to find specific documents.
57
DOCUMENTS

REFINE YOUR SEARCH

Sections

Type of document

Your filters
Speeches X Prospectus X Market Abuse X Securitisation X Fund Management X Vacancy X Letter X Statement X
Reset all filters
Date Ref. Title Section Type Download Info Summary Related Documents Translated versions
08/03/2011 EC 21-02-11 Letter from Jonathan Faull regarding the extension of the deadline for delivery of ESMA’s advice on the AIFMD Letter PDF
149.8 KB
23/03/2011 2011/36 Public statement- Framework for third country prospectuses under Article 20 of the Prospectus Directive , Statement PDF
317.51 KB
23/03/2011 2011/37 Public statement- ESMA statement on Israeli laws and regulations on prospectuses , Statement PDF
187.46 KB
16/11/2011 2011/382 Letter to Michel Barnier- ESMA's response to the European Commission's provisional request to CESR/ESMA for technical advice on possible Level 2 measures concerningthe Directive for Alternative Investment Fund Managers (AIFM) Letter PDF
41.73 KB
16/11/2011 2011/383 Letter to Jonathan Faull- ESMA's response to the European Commission's provisional request to CESR/ESMA for technical advice on possible Level 2 measures concerningthe Directive for Alternative Investment Fund Managers (AIFM) Letter PDF
41.73 KB
16/11/2011 2011/384 Letter to Sharon Bowles- ESMA's response to the European Commission's provisional request to CESR/ESMA for technical advice on possible Level 2 measures concerningthe Directive for Alternative Investment Fund Managers (AIFM) Letter PDF
200.77 KB
06/01/2012 2012/10 Interpretation of the Mineral Companies Recommendations for cement companies , Letter PDF
41.27 KB
Open letter regarding Interpretation of the Mineral Companies Recommendations for cement companies
01/03/2012 2012/138 ESMA’s technical advice on possible delegated acts concerning the Prospectus Directive as amended by the Directive 2010/73/EU , Letter PDF
94.68 KB
09/01/2013 2012/878 ESMA’s technical advice on possible delegated acts concerning the Prospectus Directive as amended by the Directive 2010/73/EU , Letter PDF
36.15 KB
18/07/2013 Ares(2013)2569526 European Commission letter to ESMA re draft Regulatory Technical Standards on types of AIFMD, Article 4(4) of AIFMD Directive Letter PDF
125.25 KB
On 8 July 2013 ESMA received a letter from the European Commission (EC) in response to its draft regulatory technical standards in its Final report - Draft Regulatory Technical Standards on types of AIFMs (ESMA/2013/413) submitted to the EC on 2 April 2013 for endorsement. According to Article 10(1) sixth subparagraph of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010, ESMA has 6 weeks starting from 8 July to respond to the EC’s letter.
10/01/2014 2013/1932 Deadlines for the submission of draft technical standards , Letter PDF
51.91 KB
21/05/2015 2015/857 ESMA response to the European Commission consultation on the review of the Prospectus Directive , Letter PDF
241.24 KB
30/07/2015 2015/1232 Letter to the European Commission- ESMA’s opinion and advice on the AIFMD passport Letter PDF
71.12 KB
30/07/2015 2015/1233 Letter to the European Parliament- ESMA’s opinion and advice on the AIFMD passport Letter PDF
65.84 KB
30/07/2015 2015/1234 Letter to the European Council- ESMA’s opinion and advice on the AIFMD passport Letter PDF
64.7 KB
19/01/2016 Ares(2015)5921711 EU Commission Letter AIFMD Passport Letter PDF
63.78 KB
28/01/2016 2016/102 Statement by Steven Maijoor on behalf of the ESAs , Statement PDF
107.74 KB

Statement at the ECON scrutiny hearing on behalf of the ESAs.

02/02/2016 2016/165 Public Statement- Supervisory work on potential closet index tracking Statement PDF
258.17 KB

The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) is issuing this statement to inform stakeholders and especially investors about the potential for some European collective investment funds to be ‘closet index trackers’, and to give details on the work that ESMA has been doing in this context.

Introduction

  1. ESMA’s attention was drawn to an alleged practice in the European collective investment management industry whereby asset managers claim, according to their fund rules and investor information documentation, to manage their funds in an active manner while the funds are, in fact, staying very close to a benchmark and therefore implementing an investment strategy which requires less input from the investment manager. At the same time, it is alleged that these funds charge management fees in line with those of funds that are considered to be actively managed[1]. This practice is commonly referred to as ‘closet indexing’ or ‘index hugging’.
  2. In many EU Member States, NCAs have launched or are in the process of launching specific investigations, in addition to their regular monitoring and supervisory functions, to determine the potential extent of closet indexing in their jurisdictions, with a focus on equity funds at this stage. At the same time, the issue has been the subject of considerable attention by investor protection groups and the media throughout the European Union.

Reasons for issuing this statement

  1. The issues around ‘closet indexing’ form part of a broader issue on the effectiveness of investor disclosure and the legitimate expectations of investors in respect of the service provided by some asset managers. Nonetheless, the potential practice of closet indexing in Europe raises questions that merit closer analysis. The analysis carried out by ESMA (see paragraphs 9 to 16 for more details) indicates that there might be a small, but not insignificant number of funds in the EU equity fund sector that may be closet index trackers. If the existence of this practice were to be confirmed by further supervisory scrutiny carried out at national level, this could mean that:
  1. investors could be making investment decisions based on an expectation that they will be provided with a more active fund management service than they receive in practice and, therefore, may be paying higher management fees than that usually envisaged for a passive/not significantly active management service;
  2. investors may be exposed to a different risk/return profile than they expect; and
  3. some asset managers may not provide clear descriptions of how funds are managed in key disclosure documents such as the fund’s Prospectus and Key Investor Information Document (KIID).
  1. ESMA considers it important that fund managers take their commitments in disclosure documents seriously. Managers should expect supervisory consequences where evidence for incorrect disclosures is proven.
 

[1] ESMA recognises that management fees may depend on a number of factors.

31/03/2016 2016/412 Letter to European Commission, European Council and European Parliament on the Proportionality principle and remuneration rules in the financial sector Letter PDF
154.73 KB
25/05/2016 2016/724 Requirements for reference data submission under Article 4 MAR , Statement PDF
88.1 KB