ESMA LIBRARY
REFINE YOUR SEARCH
Sections
- (-) Remove Board of Supervisors filter Board of Supervisors
- (-) Remove Joint Committee filter Joint Committee
- (-) Remove Trade Repositories filter Trade Repositories
- (-) Remove Corporate Disclosure filter Corporate Disclosure
- (-) Remove Market Abuse filter Market Abuse
- (-) Remove Securitisation filter Securitisation
- (-) Remove Transparency filter Transparency
- Management Board (60) Apply Management Board filter
- Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group (45) Apply Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group filter
- Credit Rating Agencies (24) Apply Credit Rating Agencies filter
- Board of Appeal (18) Apply Board of Appeal filter
- Corporate Information (9) Apply Corporate Information filter
- MiFID - Secondary Markets (9) Apply MiFID - Secondary Markets filter
- Short Selling (9) Apply Short Selling filter
- Supervisory convergence (9) Apply Supervisory convergence filter
- CESR Archive (7) Apply CESR Archive filter
- Market Integrity (7) Apply Market Integrity filter
- MiFID - Investor Protection (7) Apply MiFID - Investor Protection filter
- Post Trading (7) Apply Post Trading filter
- Fund Management (6) Apply Fund Management filter
- COVID-19 (5) Apply COVID-19 filter
- Sustainable finance (4) Apply Sustainable finance filter
- Brexit (2) Apply Brexit filter
- Careers (2) Apply Careers filter
- Corporate Finance (2) Apply Corporate Finance filter
- Prospectus (2) Apply Prospectus filter
- Benchmarks (1) Apply Benchmarks filter
- Corporate Governance (1) Apply Corporate Governance filter
- Crowdfunding (1) Apply Crowdfunding filter
- Guidelines and Technical standards (1) Apply Guidelines and Technical standards filter
- Innovation and Products (1) Apply Innovation and Products filter
- Press Releases (1) Apply Press Releases filter
- Procurement (1) Apply Procurement filter
- Securities Financing Transactions (1) Apply Securities Financing Transactions filter
- Trading (1) Apply Trading filter
Type of document
- (-) Remove Summary of Conclusions filter Summary of Conclusions
- (-) Remove Decision filter Decision
- (-) Remove Q&A filter Q&A
- Reference (234) Apply Reference filter
- Letter (206) Apply Letter filter
- Press Release (104) Apply Press Release filter
- Guidelines & Recommendations (90) Apply Guidelines & Recommendations filter
- Final Report (81) Apply Final Report filter
- Statement (69) Apply Statement filter
- Consultation Paper (64) Apply Consultation Paper filter
- Report (49) Apply Report filter
- Speech (18) Apply Speech filter
- Opinion (17) Apply Opinion filter
- Annual Report (12) Apply Annual Report filter
- Compliance table (10) Apply Compliance table filter
- Technical Advice (7) Apply Technical Advice filter
- Technical Standards (7) Apply Technical Standards filter
- CESR Document (5) Apply CESR Document filter
- SMSG Advice (3) Apply SMSG Advice filter
- Investor Warning (2) Apply Investor Warning filter
Date | Ref. | Title | Section | Type | Download | Info | Summary | Related Documents | Translated versions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
17/05/2011 | 2011/BS/123 | Decision of the Board of Supervisors- Appointment of the Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group | Board of Supervisors, Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group | Decision | PDF 171.3 KB |
||||
19/12/2011 | 2011/BS/229 | Decision of the European Securities and Markets Authority establishing its Review Panel | Board of Supervisors, Corporate Information, Supervisory convergence | Decision | PDF 35.86 KB |
This decision establishes the Review Panel of ESMA and sets out its mandate. | |||
24/06/2013 | BoA 2013-008 | Board of Appeal Decision | Joint Committee, Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 242.72 KB |
The joint Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities (EBA, ESMA and EIOPA) has published today its decision in an appeal brought by an Estonian company against a decision of the EBA. It concerned the question whether the suitability of the managers of a significant branch of a bank may be a matter within EU law, and not just national law. Allowing the appeal, the Board of Appeal interpreted Directive No. 2006/48/EC consistently with the EBA Guidelines on the assessment of the suitability of members of the management body and key function holders. It came to the conclusion that the “fit and proper” requirement is not restricted to the persons who direct the business of the credit institution. The matter therefore was within the EBA’s powers of investigation. Although the appellant criticised the way in which the EBA dealt with its complaint, the Board of Appeal made it clear that it did not accept that criticism. It considered that the EBA dealt with the complaint in an appropriate manner. The ground on which the appeal was allowed was one of interpretation of the applicable legal provisions. The case was remitted to the EBA to adopt the appropriate decision in accordance with the Board of Appeal’s findings. This is for information only. The decision consists of the signed Decision only. For any enquiries, please contact EIOPA’s Press Office: Anzhelika Mayer Tel.: +49 69 9511 1968 | |||
13/01/2014 | BoA 2013-014 | Board of Appeal Decision Global Private Rating Company v. ESMA | Joint Committee, Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 361.96 KB |
Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities dismisses appeal made by a refused CRA-applicant against ESMA On 10 January 2014, the Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities handed down its decision on an appeal by the appellant, Global Private Rating Company “Standard Rating” Ltd, against the refusal by the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) to register it as a credit rating agency. This is the first appeal against a decision by ESMA refusing an applicant registration as a credit rating agency. The Board of Appeal unanimously decided that the appeal should be dismissed, and that ESMA’s refusal decision should be confirmed. It stated that it accepted the appellant’s point that the registration of a credit rating agency by ESMA is a new process, and recognised that the procedures will to an extent take time fully to work out. Nevertheless, because of the responsibilities placed on credit rating agencies and their importance in the financial system generally, it considered that the onus must be on an applicant to satisfy ESMA that the relevant requirements are met. The application and its contents must be very clear, and it is not ESMA’s responsibility as regulator to remedy deficiencies. | |||
17/07/2014 | 2014/C1/02 | Board of Appeal Decision | Joint Committee, Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 368.94 KB |
The Joint Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities (the European Banking Authority, the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority and the European Securities and Markets Authority) published its decision in an appeal brought by SV Capital OÜ, an Estonian company, against a decision of the EBA. This was the second appeal to be considered by the Board of Appeal in this matter between the same parties concerning the question whether the suitability of the managers of a significant branch of a bank raised a question of Union law. Following the Board of Appeal’s affirmative decision of 24 June 2013, the appellant requested the EBA to initiate an investigation against the Estonian and Finnish Financial Supervision Authorities because their alleged failure to take action in respect of individuals in the Estonian branch of Nordea Bank Finland PLC whom it was alleged were not fit and proper persons to be key function holders in the bank. The EBA decided that it would not initiate an investigation. The Board of Appeal decided that the EBA had been right to raise the matter with the national supervisors, but that having done so, it was entitled to take no further action in the light of their responses. The Board accordingly dismissed the appellant’s appeal against the EBA’s decision. | |||
02/12/2014 | 2014/BOA/05 | Decision by the ESA BoA concerning Investor Protection Europe sprl | Joint Committee, Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 229.85 KB |
The Joint Board of Appeal of the ESAs decides on the inadmissibility of an appeal brought by IPE sprl, a company based in Brussels, against a decision by ESMAThe Joint Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities published today its decision in an appeal brought by Investor Protection Europe (IPE) sprl, a company based in Brussels, against a decision of the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) of 10 June 2014 not to initiate an investigation under Article 17 of the ESMA Regulation regarding an alleged breach of Union law by the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier of Luxembourg. The Board of Appeal unanimously decided that the appeal was inadmissible, and in the light of that decision, did not consider the substance of IPE’s complaint. | |||
14/08/2015 | BOA/2015/001 | Decision of the Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities given under Article 60 of Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010 and the Board of Appeal’s Rules of Procedure (BOA 2012 002) | Joint Committee, Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 147.78 KB |
||||
21/10/2015 | 2015/BS/139rev | SoC Board of Supervisors- 9 July conference call | Board of Supervisors | Summary of Conclusions | PDF 147.59 KB |
||||
21/10/2015 | 2015/BS/140 | SoC June 2015 Board of Supervisors | Board of Supervisors | Summary of Conclusions | PDF 271.78 KB |
||||
21/10/2015 | 2015/BS/168rev | SoC Board of Supervisors- conference call 31 August 2015 | Board of Supervisors | Summary of Conclusions | PDF 122.18 KB |
||||
01/12/2015 | 2015/BS/202rev1 | Summary of Conclusions September 2015 Board meeting | Board of Supervisors | Summary of Conclusions | PDF 268.78 KB |
||||
17/12/2015 | 2015/BS/232rev | SoC November 2015 Board of Supervisors | Board of Supervisors | Summary of Conclusions | PDF 279.1 KB |
||||
03/02/2016 | 2016/BS/2rev1 | SoC Board of Supervisors | Board of Supervisors | Summary of Conclusions | PDF 212.94 KB |
||||
31/03/2016 | 2016/408 | Decision to adopt a supervisory measure taking the form of a public notice and to impose a fine in accordance with Statement of Findings in accordance with Articles 64(5), 65, 67 and 73 of Regulation (EC) No 648/2012 EMIR | Trade Repositories | Decision | PDF 62.47 KB |
Decision to adopt a supervisory measure taking the form of a public notice and to impose a fine in accordance with Statement of Findings in accordance with Articles 64(5), 65, 67 and 73 of Regulation (EC) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories Public notice regarding negligent breach by DTCC Derivatives Repository Ltd of its legal obligation to ensure immediate access for regulators to data reported under EMIR DTCC Derivatives Repository Ltd (‘DDRL’) is a trade repository registered in the European Union and is part of the DTCC group which includes a number of companies providing post-trading services to the global financial services industry. DDRL was registered by ESMA as a trade repository under Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories (‘EMIR’) on 7 November 2013. ESMA has responsibilities for the supervision and enforcement of provisions under EMIR concerning DDRL and other trade repositories registered in the EU. In May 2014, ESMA’s supervisory team became aware of delays in providing regulators with access to data reported to DDRL under EMIR. Following further examination, the supervisory team formed the view that there were serious indications of the possible existence of facts liable to constitute one or more of the infringements listed in EMIR. The matter was accordingly referred to an independent investigation officer (the ‘IIO’). The IIO considered the evidence referred to him and conducted further investigations, before submitting his findings to ESMA’s Board of Supervisors (the ‘ESMA Board’). Based on the findings of the IIO and the evidence put before it, the ESMA Board found on 23 March 2016 that an examination of the facts showed that DDRL had committed the following infringement under EMIR and had done so negligently. DDRL committed an infringement of EMIR by not allowing regulators and supervisors direct and immediate access to the details of derivatives contracts they need to fulfil their responsibilities and mandates. |
|||
01/04/2016 | 2016/419 | Q&A Market Abuse Directive | Market Abuse | Q&A | PDF 175.08 KB |
||||
05/04/2016 | 2016/BS/61rev1 | Summary of conclusions BoS meeting 27/01/2016 | Board of Supervisors | Summary of Conclusions | PDF 258.36 KB |
||||
05/04/2016 | 2016/BS/72rev1 | Summary of conclusions BoS meeting 07/03/2016 | Board of Supervisors | Summary of Conclusions | PDF 148.73 KB |
||||
01/06/2016 | 2016/BS/110rev1 | Summary of conclusions BoS meeting 23/03/2016 | Board of Supervisors | Summary of Conclusions | PDF 258.81 KB |
||||
20/06/2016 | 2016/BS/117rev1 | Summary of Conclusions Board of Supervisors Conference call 28/04/2016 | Board of Supervisors | Summary of Conclusions | PDF 208.82 KB |
||||
19/07/2016 | 2016-BS-151rev1 | Summary of Conclusions BoS meeting 25 May 2016 | Board of Supervisors | Summary of Conclusions | PDF 303.49 KB |