ESMA LIBRARY
REFINE YOUR SEARCH
Sections
- (-) Remove Securitisation filter Securitisation
- (-) Remove Supervisory convergence filter Supervisory convergence
- (-) Remove Corporate Governance filter Corporate Governance
- (-) Remove CCP Directorate filter CCP Directorate
- (-) Remove International cooperation filter International cooperation
- Guidelines and Technical standards (547) Apply Guidelines and Technical standards filter
- CESR Archive (183) Apply CESR Archive filter
- Fund Management (140) Apply Fund Management filter
- MiFID - Investor Protection (98) Apply MiFID - Investor Protection filter
- Joint Committee (92) Apply Joint Committee filter
- Credit Rating Agencies (64) Apply Credit Rating Agencies filter
- Post Trading (64) Apply Post Trading filter
- MiFID - Secondary Markets (37) Apply MiFID - Secondary Markets filter
- Short Selling (28) Apply Short Selling filter
- Corporate Disclosure (19) Apply Corporate Disclosure filter
- Market Abuse (16) Apply Market Abuse filter
- Prospectus (15) Apply Prospectus filter
- Market Integrity (11) Apply Market Integrity filter
- Benchmarks (9) Apply Benchmarks filter
- Trading (7) Apply Trading filter
- Transparency (5) Apply Transparency filter
- IFRS Supervisory Convergence (4) Apply IFRS Supervisory Convergence filter
- Innovation and Products (3) Apply Innovation and Products filter
- Securities Financing Transactions (3) Apply Securities Financing Transactions filter
- Corporate Finance (2) Apply Corporate Finance filter
- Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors (2) Apply Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors filter
- Sustainable finance (2) Apply Sustainable finance filter
- Trade Repositories (2) Apply Trade Repositories filter
- European Single Electronic Format (1) Apply European Single Electronic Format filter
- MiFID II: Transparency Calculations and DVC (1) Apply MiFID II: Transparency Calculations and DVC filter
Type of document
- (-) Remove Consultation Paper filter Consultation Paper
- (-) Remove Guidelines & Recommendations filter Guidelines & Recommendations
- Reference (187) Apply Reference filter
- Investor Warning (91) Apply Investor Warning filter
- SMSG Advice (76) Apply SMSG Advice filter
- Press Release (53) Apply Press Release filter
- Summary of Conclusions (34) Apply Summary of Conclusions filter
- Report (31) Apply Report filter
- Final Report (25) Apply Final Report filter
- Statement (18) Apply Statement filter
- Letter (17) Apply Letter filter
- Opinion (9) Apply Opinion filter
- Q&A (9) Apply Q&A filter
- Speech (9) Apply Speech filter
- Decision (6) Apply Decision filter
- Technical Advice (2) Apply Technical Advice filter
- Annual Report (1) Apply Annual Report filter
Date | Ref. | Title | Section | Type | Download | Info | Summary | Related Documents | Translated versions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
14/09/2011 | 2011/288 | Call for evidence- Empty voting | Corporate Disclosure, Corporate Governance, Transparency | Consultation Paper | PDF 81.13 KB |
||||
22/03/2012 | 2012/212 | Discussion Paper- An Overview of the Proxy Advisory Industry. Considerations on Possible Policy Options | Corporate Disclosure, Corporate Governance | Consultation Paper | PDF 524.85 KB |
This Discussion Paper focuses on the development of the proxy advisory industry in Europe, which mainly serves institutional investors such as asset managers, mutual funds and pension funds. Following its fact-finding work in 2011, ESMA recognises the proxy advisory industry within Europe is, or is expected to be, growing in prominence and investors are, or are expected to be, increasingly using proxy advisor services. In this paper ESMA identifies several key issues related to the proxy advisory market which may have an impact on the proper functioning of the voting process. The range of policy options that ESMA will consider, and on which it seeks further input from market participants, consists of four broad areas, including: 1. No EU-level action at this stage 2. Encouraging Member States and/or industry to develop standards 3. Quasi-binding EU-level regulatory instruments 4. Binding EU-level legislative instruments ESMA will consider these options based on the feedback it receives from market participants, and, if appropriate, will undertake further policy action, either directly or by providing an opinion to the European Commission. The reason to bring up some policy options is due to the fact that proxy advisors are currently not regulated at a pan-European level. Nevertheless, there are relevant European rules that apply to investors (e.g. for UCITS management companies when exercising voting rights). In addition, there are also well-recognised corporate governance standards that apply to issuers at a national level (based on the “comply or explain approach”) and some complements to improve standards of stewardship among investors. All feedback received from this Discussion Paper will be duly considered. ESMA expects to publish a feedback statement in Q4 of 2012 which will summarise the responses received and will state ESMA’s view on whether there is a need for policy action in this area. | |||
18/07/2013 | 2013/998 | Guidelines on the model MoU concerning consultation, cooperation and the exchange of information related to the supervision of AIFMD entities | International cooperation, Fund Management | Guidelines & Recommendations | PDF 245.15 KB |
ESMA finalises supervisory co-operation agreements for alternative investment funds The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has approved seven co-operation arrangements between EU securities regulators and their global counterparts with responsibility for the supervision of alternative investment funds, including hedge funds, private equity and real estate funds. ESMA’s Board of Supervisors, at its July meeting, approved Memoranda of Understanding (MoUs) with authorities from the Bahamas, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico and the United States, including the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). ESMA has now negotiated 38 agreements on behalf of the 31 EU/EEA national competent authorities for securities markets supervision. The co-operation agreements allow for the exchange of information, cross-border on-site visits and mutual assistance in the enforcement of respective supervisory laws. ESMA had approved 31 MoUs with other non-EU regulators in May. The agreements cover third-country alternative investment fund managers (AIFMs) that market alternative investment funds (AIFs) in the EU and EU AIFMs that manage or market AIFs outside the EU. The agreements also cover co-operation in the cross-border supervision of depositaries and AIFMs’ delegates. National securities regulators in the EU, as the supervisors of AIFMs, are in the process of signing MoUs with those jurisdictions relevant to their market. The existence of co-operation arrangements between the EU and non-EU authorities is a precondition of the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD) for allowing managers from third countries access to EU markets or to perform fund management by delegation from EU managers by 22 July 2013. The co-operation arrangements are applicable from 22 July, and will enable cross-border marketing of AIFs to professional investors between jurisdictions. This is subject to the non-EU jurisdiction not being listed as a non-cooperative jurisdiction by the Financial Action Task Force and, as from the entry into force of the passport for non-EU managers, having co-operation agreements in place with EU Member States regarding the exchange of information on tax matters. The content of the ESMA MoUs follow the IOSCO Principles on Cross-Border Supervisory Co-operation of 2010, and complements the terms and conditions of the IOSCO Multilateral MoU Concerning Consultation and Co-operation and the Exchange of Information of 2002 (MMoU). ESMA had originally contacted all the authorities that have signed the IOSCO MMoU of 2002. ESMA has now approved MoUs with those 42 authorities that responded to ESMA’s call. ESMA continues to negotiate the MoU with the Chinese authority. Memoranda of Understanding (MoUs) MoU with AFSA (Albania) MoU with ASIC (Australia) MoU with BMA (Bermuda) MoU with Canadian authorities Accompanying letter MoU with CDVM (Morocco) MoU with CFTC (US) Accompanying letter MoU with CIMA (Cayman Islands) MoU with CMA (Kenya) MoU with CMSA (Tanzania) MoU with CNBV (Mexico) MoU with CVM (Brazil) MoU with DFSA (Dubai) MoU with FCSM (Mauritius) MoU with FINMA (Switzerland) MoU with FSA (Labuan) MoU with FSC (BVI) MoU with FSC (Guernsey) MoU with FSC (Isle of Man) MoU with FSC (Jersey) MoU with HKMA (Hong Kong) MoU with ISA (Israel) MoU with JFSA (Japan) MoU with MAFF (Japan) MoU with MAS (Singapore) MoU with METI (Japan) MoU with OCC and FED (US) MoU with OSFI (Canada) MoU with SC (Malaysia) MoU with SC (Republic of Srpska) MoU with SC (The Bahamas) MoU with SCA (UAE) MoU with SEBI (India) MoU with SEC (Montenegro) MoU with SEC (Pakistan) MoU with SEC (Thailand) MoU with SEC Macedonia (FYROM) MoU with SFC (Hong Kong) MoU with US SEC Accompanying letter MoU with EFSA (Egypt) MoU with FMA (New Zealand) MoU with FSB (South Africa) MoU with SSC (Vietnam) MoU with FSC and FSS (South Korea) |
|||
08/06/2015 | 2015/920 | Impact of the Best Practice Principles for Providers of Shareholder Voting Research and Analysis | Corporate Disclosure, Corporate Governance | Consultation Paper | PDF 337.08 KB |
Responding to this Call for Evidence ESMA invites comments on all matters in this paper and in particular on the specific questions presented throughout the paper. Comments are most helpful, if they:a. respond to the question stated;b. indicate the specific question to which they relate; andc. contain a clear rationale. ESMA will consider all comments received by 27 July 2015. All contributions should be submitted online at www.esma.europa.eu under the heading ‘Your input - Consultations’. Publication of responses All contributions received will be published following the close of the Call for Evidence, unless you request otherwise. Please clearly and prominently indicate in your submission any part you do not wish to be publically disclosed. A standard confidentiality statement in an email message will not be treated as a request for non-disclosure. A confidential response may be requested from us in accordance with ESMA’s rules on access to documents. We may consult you, if we receive such a request. Any decision we make not to disclose the response is reviewable by ESMA’s Board of Appeal and the European Ombudsman.Data protection Information on data protection can be found at www.esma.europa.eu under the heading Legal Notice.Who should read this Call for Evidence This Call for Evidence will be of relevance to persons and entities participating in the voting chain, particularly proxy advisors, investors, companies listed in Europe, proxy solicitors and consultants. | |||
19/12/2017 | ESMA33-128-33 | Consultation_Paper_STS notification | Securitisation | Consultation Paper | PDF 1.01 MB |
||||
19/12/2017 | ESMA33-128-107 | Consultation_Paper_Disclosure_and_Operational_Standards | Securitisation | Consultation Paper | PDF 2.66 MB |
||||
19/12/2017 | ESMA33-128-108 | Consultation_Paper_Third-Party_Firm_STS_Verification_Application | Securitisation | Consultation Paper | PDF 586.89 KB |
||||
23/03/2018 | ESMA33-128-109 | Consultation Paper Securitisation Repositories Application | Securitisation | Consultation Paper | PDF 720.24 KB |
||||
23/03/2018 | ESMA33-128-212 | ESMA33-128-212 Consultation Paper TA Fees Securitisation Repositories | Securitisation | Consultation Paper | PDF 659.97 KB |
||||
17/01/2020 | ESMA 33-128-827 | Guidelines on securitisation repository data completeness and consistency thresholds | Securitisation | Consultation Paper | PDF 694.01 KB |
||||
26/03/2020 | ESMA70-151-2852 | Consultation Report PTRR Services- Article 85(3a) of EMIR | Post Trading, Supervisory convergence | Consultation Paper | PDF 537.27 KB |
||||
27/03/2020 | ESMA74-362-47 | CP on the TS on reporting data quality data access and registration of TRs under EMIR REFIT | Post Trading, Supervisory convergence, Trade Repositories | Consultation Paper | PDF 2.66 MB |
||||
02/04/2020 | ESMA70-151-2823 | ESMA Report to the European Commission on Central Clearing Obligations for PSA- No 1 | Joint Committee, Post Trading, Supervisory convergence | Consultation Paper | PDF 309.21 KB |
||||
23/10/2020 | ESMA70-151-3023 | Consultation Paper on Article 15 and 49 EMIR | CCP Directorate | Consultation Paper | PDF 581.02 KB |
||||
23/10/2020 | ESMA70-151-3076 | Consultation Paper on Guidelines under Article 21 of EMIR | CCP Directorate | Consultation Paper | PDF 409.12 KB |
||||
05/11/2020 | ESMA34-39-992 | Guidelines on performance fees in UCITS and certain types of AIFs | Fund Management, Guidelines and Technical standards, Supervisory convergence | Guidelines & Recommendations | PDF 224.69 KB |
bgcsdadeelesetfifrhrhuitltlvmtnlplptroskslsv | |||
20/11/2020 | ESMA74-362-932 | CP on DRSP criteria for derogation | Post Trading, Supervisory convergence, Trading | Consultation Paper | PDF 384.54 KB |
||||
20/11/2020 | ESMA74-362-837 | CP on DRSP fees | Post Trading, Supervisory convergence, Trading | Consultation Paper | PDF 526.22 KB |