ESMA LIBRARY
REFINE YOUR SEARCH
Sections
- (-) Remove Joint Committee filter Joint Committee
- (-) Remove Corporate Disclosure filter Corporate Disclosure
- (-) Remove Market Abuse filter Market Abuse
- (-) Remove Prospectus filter Prospectus
- (-) Remove Planning reporting budget filter Planning reporting budget
- (-) Remove Trade Repositories filter Trade Repositories
- (-) Remove Innovation and Products filter Innovation and Products
- (-) Remove Corporate Governance filter Corporate Governance
- CESR Archive (200) Apply CESR Archive filter
- Corporate Information (78) Apply Corporate Information filter
- Post Trading (54) Apply Post Trading filter
- Fund Management (40) Apply Fund Management filter
- Credit Rating Agencies (35) Apply Credit Rating Agencies filter
- MiFID - Secondary Markets (34) Apply MiFID - Secondary Markets filter
- MiFID - Investor Protection (31) Apply MiFID - Investor Protection filter
- CCP Directorate (22) Apply CCP Directorate filter
- Benchmarks (10) Apply Benchmarks filter
- Market Integrity (9) Apply Market Integrity filter
- Securitisation (9) Apply Securitisation filter
- Trading (9) Apply Trading filter
- Board of Supervisors (6) Apply Board of Supervisors filter
- Short Selling (6) Apply Short Selling filter
- Securities Financing Transactions (5) Apply Securities Financing Transactions filter
- Supervisory convergence (5) Apply Supervisory convergence filter
- Management Board (4) Apply Management Board filter
- Market data (4) Apply Market data filter
- Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors (4) Apply Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors filter
- Transparency (4) Apply Transparency filter
- Corporate Finance (3) Apply Corporate Finance filter
- Guidelines and Technical standards (3) Apply Guidelines and Technical standards filter
- IFRS Supervisory Convergence (3) Apply IFRS Supervisory Convergence filter
- Sustainable finance (2) Apply Sustainable finance filter
- COVID-19 (1) Apply COVID-19 filter
- Crowdfunding (1) Apply Crowdfunding filter
- European Single Electronic Format (1) Apply European Single Electronic Format filter
- MiFID II: Transparency Calculations and DVC (1) Apply MiFID II: Transparency Calculations and DVC filter
Type of document
- (-) Remove Consultation Paper filter Consultation Paper
- (-) Remove Annual Report filter Annual Report
- Press Release (349) Apply Press Release filter
- Reference (226) Apply Reference filter
- Letter (202) Apply Letter filter
- Guidelines & Recommendations (91) Apply Guidelines & Recommendations filter
- Final Report (87) Apply Final Report filter
- Statement (74) Apply Statement filter
- Report (70) Apply Report filter
- Speech (30) Apply Speech filter
- Opinion (18) Apply Opinion filter
- Q&A (16) Apply Q&A filter
- Compliance table (12) Apply Compliance table filter
- Decision (11) Apply Decision filter
- Summary of Conclusions (11) Apply Summary of Conclusions filter
- Technical Advice (6) Apply Technical Advice filter
- Technical Standards (6) Apply Technical Standards filter
- CESR Document (5) Apply CESR Document filter
- SMSG Advice (3) Apply SMSG Advice filter
- Investor Warning (2) Apply Investor Warning filter
Date | Ref. | Title | Section | Type | Download | Info | Summary | Related Documents | Translated versions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
15/07/2002 | 02-089b | CESR’s Advice on possible Level 2 Implementing Measures for the proposed Market Abuse Directive | Market Abuse | Consultation Paper | PDF 213.95 KB |
||||
28/10/2004 | 04-505 | Consultation paper- Facilitating the implementation of the Market Abuse Directive | Market Abuse | Consultation Paper | PDF 284.76 KB |
||||
02/11/2006 | 06-562 | Consultation paper- Market Abuse Directive, Level 3 – second set of CESR guidance and information on the common operation of the Directive to the market | Market Abuse | Consultation Paper | PDF 110.17 KB |
||||
20/05/2008 | 08-274 | Consultation paper- Market Abuse Directive Level 3 – Third set of CESR guidance and information on the common operation of the Directive to the market | Market Abuse | Consultation Paper | PDF 101.96 KB |
||||
03/10/2008 | 08-717 | Consultation paper- MAD Level 3 – Third set of CESR guidance and information on the common operation of the Directive to the market | Market Abuse | Consultation Paper | PDF 88.1 KB |
||||
26/01/2011 | 2011/35 | Call for evidence- Request for technical advice on possible delegated acts concerning the Prospectus Directive (2003/71/EC) as amended by the Directive 2010/73/EU | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Consultation Paper | PDF 3.85 MB |
||||
15/06/2011 | 2011/141 | Consultation paper- ESMA’s technical advice on possible delegated acts concerning the Prospectus Directive as amended by the Directive 2010/73/EU | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Consultation Paper | PDF 1.45 MB |
||||
14/09/2011 | 2011/288 | Call for evidence- Empty voting | Corporate Disclosure, Corporate Governance, Transparency | Consultation Paper | PDF 81.13 KB |
||||
10/11/2011 | 2011/373 | Consultation paper- Considerations of materiality in financial reporting | Corporate Disclosure, IFRS Supervisory Convergence | Consultation Paper | PDF 170.93 KB |
||||
13/12/2011 | 2011/444 | ESMA’s technical advice on possible delegated acts concerning the Prospectus Directive as amended by the Directive 2010/73/EU | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Consultation Paper | PDF 1.15 MB |
The purpose of this consultation document from ESMA is to seek comments on the technical advice that ESMA proposes to give to the European Commission on a number of possible delegated acts. | |||
06/03/2012 | JC/DP/2012/1 | Joint Discussion Paper on Draft Regulatory Technical Standards on risk mitigation techniques for OTC derivatives not cleared by a CCP under the Regulation on OTC derivatives, CCPs and Trade Repositories | Joint Committee | Consultation Paper | PDF 402.37 KB |
EBA, EIOPA and ESMA (the ESAs) invite market participants and all interested stakeholders to provide their feedback on planned regulatory technical standards covering risk mitigation techniques for OTC derivatives not cleared by central counterparties. The EMIR Regulation (“the Regulation”) on OTC Derivatives, CCPs and trade repositories introduces provisions to improve transparency and reduce the risks associated with the OTC derivatives market and establishes common rules for central counterparties (CCPs) and for trade repositories (TRs). The Regulation acknowledges that not all OTC derivatives would meet the necessary requirements to be centrally cleared. For this reason, it introduces provisions on risk mitigation techniques for OTC derivatives not cleared by a CCP. | |||
22/03/2012 | 2012/212 | Discussion Paper- An Overview of the Proxy Advisory Industry. Considerations on Possible Policy Options | Corporate Disclosure, Corporate Governance | Consultation Paper | PDF 524.85 KB |
This Discussion Paper focuses on the development of the proxy advisory industry in Europe, which mainly serves institutional investors such as asset managers, mutual funds and pension funds. Following its fact-finding work in 2011, ESMA recognises the proxy advisory industry within Europe is, or is expected to be, growing in prominence and investors are, or are expected to be, increasingly using proxy advisor services. In this paper ESMA identifies several key issues related to the proxy advisory market which may have an impact on the proper functioning of the voting process. The range of policy options that ESMA will consider, and on which it seeks further input from market participants, consists of four broad areas, including: 1. No EU-level action at this stage 2. Encouraging Member States and/or industry to develop standards 3. Quasi-binding EU-level regulatory instruments 4. Binding EU-level legislative instruments ESMA will consider these options based on the feedback it receives from market participants, and, if appropriate, will undertake further policy action, either directly or by providing an opinion to the European Commission. The reason to bring up some policy options is due to the fact that proxy advisors are currently not regulated at a pan-European level. Nevertheless, there are relevant European rules that apply to investors (e.g. for UCITS management companies when exercising voting rights). In addition, there are also well-recognised corporate governance standards that apply to issuers at a national level (based on the “comply or explain approach”) and some complements to improve standards of stewardship among investors. All feedback received from this Discussion Paper will be duly considered. ESMA expects to publish a feedback statement in Q4 of 2012 which will summarise the responses received and will state ESMA’s view on whether there is a need for policy action in this area. | |||
14/05/2012 | JC/CP/2012/01 | EBA, EIOPA and ESMA’s Joint Consultation Paper on its proposed response to the Commission’s Review of the Financial Conglomerates Directive | Joint Committee | Consultation Paper | PDF 590.22 KB |
||||
20/06/2012 | 2012/380 | ESMA’s technical advice on possible delegated acts concerning the Prospectus Directive as amended by the Directive 2010/73/EU | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Consultation Paper | PDF 1.49 MB |
Responses to this consultation paper should be submitted online by 20 August 2012. | |||
31/08/2012 | JC/CP/2012/02 | Joint consultation paper on Draft Regulatory Technical Standards on the uniform conditions of application of the calculation methods under Article 6.2 of the Financial Conglomerates Directive | Joint Committee | Consultation Paper | PDF 769.24 KB |
Please send your comments to the EBA, EIOPA and ESMA by email to joint-committee@eba.europa.eu, jointcommittee@eiopa.europa.eu and joint.committee@esma.europa.eu by 05.10.2012, indicating the reference ‘JC CP 2012 02’ in the subject field. Please note that comments submitted after the deadline, or sent to another e-mail address will not be processed. | |||
01/10/2012 | 2012/607 | Further amendments to ESMA’s Recommendations for the consistent implementation of the Prospectus Regulation regarding mineral companies | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Consultation Paper | PDF 481.61 KB |
||||
24/10/2012 | JC/CP/2012/01 Responses | Responses to the Joint CP on Financial Conglomerates | Joint Committee | Consultation Paper | PDF 183.7 KB |
||||
25/10/2012 | JC/CP/2012/02 Responses | Responses to the second Joint CP on Financial Conglomerates | Joint Committee | Consultation Paper | ZIP 4.54 MB |
||||
15/03/2013 | 2013/316 | Draft Regulatory Technical Standards on specific situations that require the publication of a supplement to the prospectus | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Consultation Paper | PDF 672.89 KB |
The Consultation Paper sets out a draft Regulatory Technical Standard concerning situations that require the systematic publication of a supplement to the prospectus which the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) is obliged to develop in accordance with Article 16(3) of the Prospectus Directive. The listed situations are concrete examples of the general obligation in Article 16(1) to mention in a supplement every significant new factor, material mistake or inaccuracy relating to information included in the prospectus which is capable of affecting the assessment of the securities. ESMA believes that the test whether a new factor, mistake or inaccuracy qualifies as a triggering event for producing a supplement is the same test as whether information should be included in the prospectus. As a consequence, significance or materiality should be assessed according to the same qualitative and/or quantitative criteria used when drafting the prospectus. In light of this, ESMA has identified a short list comprising 10 situations, which will always require issuers, offerors or persons asking for admission to trading to draw up and publish a supplement to the prospectus.The CP includes a draft Regulatory Technical Standard setting out the situations that would require a systematic publication of a supplement as well as the minimum content of such a supplement. Responses to the consultation should be submitted online by 28 June 2013. | |||
19/07/2013 | 2013/1013 | Guidelines on enforcement of financial information | Corporate Disclosure, IFRS Supervisory Convergence | Consultation Paper | PDF 540.55 KB |
Responding to this paper The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) is seeking comments on all matters covered in this paper and in particular on the specific questions summarised in Annex 1. Comments are most helpful if they: respond to the question stated; indicate the specific question to which the comment relates; contain a clear rationale; and describe any alternatives ESMA should consider. Deadline ESMA will consider all comments received by 15 October 2013. All contributions should be submitted online at www.esma.europa.eu under the heading “Your input - Consultations” Publication of responses All contributions received will be published following the close of the consultation, unless you request otherwise. Please clearly and prominently indicate in your submission any part you do not wish to be publicly disclosed. A standard confidentiality statement in an email message will not be treated as a request for non-disclosure. A confidential response may be requested from us in accordance with ESMA’s rules on access to documents. We may consult you if we receive such a request. Any decision we make not to disclose the response is reviewable by ESMA’s Board of Appeal and the European Ombudsman. Data protection Information on data protection can be found at www.esma.europa.eu under the heading “Legal Notice”. Who should read this paper All interested parties are invited to respond to this consultation paper. It will primarily be of interest to those charged with the governance of issuers preparing financial information, users of financial information, auditors, and other parties who have a particular interest in financial reporting. |