ESMA LIBRARY
REFINE YOUR SEARCH
Sections
- (-) Remove Market Abuse filter Market Abuse
- (-) Remove Innovation and Products filter Innovation and Products
- (-) Remove Brexit filter Brexit
- (-) Remove Procurement filter Procurement
- MiFID - Investor Protection (94) Apply MiFID - Investor Protection filter
- Warnings and publications for investors (93) Apply Warnings and publications for investors filter
- MiFID - Secondary Markets (92) Apply MiFID - Secondary Markets filter
- Short Selling (42) Apply Short Selling filter
- Market Integrity (40) Apply Market Integrity filter
- Credit Rating Agencies (35) Apply Credit Rating Agencies filter
- Post Trading (33) Apply Post Trading filter
- Board of Appeal (18) Apply Board of Appeal filter
- Board of Supervisors (17) Apply Board of Supervisors filter
- COVID-19 (17) Apply COVID-19 filter
- Fund Management (16) Apply Fund Management filter
- Joint Committee (13) Apply Joint Committee filter
- Management Board (12) Apply Management Board filter
- Corporate Information (9) Apply Corporate Information filter
- Corporate Disclosure (7) Apply Corporate Disclosure filter
- Prospectus (6) Apply Prospectus filter
- Supervisory convergence (6) Apply Supervisory convergence filter
- Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group (5) Apply Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group filter
- Securitisation (4) Apply Securitisation filter
- Trade Repositories (4) Apply Trade Repositories filter
- Trading (3) Apply Trading filter
- Benchmarks (2) Apply Benchmarks filter
- Careers (2) Apply Careers filter
- CESR Archive (1) Apply CESR Archive filter
- IFRS Supervisory Convergence (1) Apply IFRS Supervisory Convergence filter
- Press Releases (1) Apply Press Releases filter
Type of document
- (-) Remove Opinion filter Opinion
- (-) Remove Technical Advice filter Technical Advice
- (-) Remove ONGOING Procedure filter ONGOING Procedure
- (-) Remove Decision filter Decision
- (-) Remove Investor Warning filter Investor Warning
- Reference (78) Apply Reference filter
- CLOSED Procedure (73) Apply CLOSED Procedure filter
- Statement (43) Apply Statement filter
- Press Release (33) Apply Press Release filter
- Speech (31) Apply Speech filter
- Final Report (21) Apply Final Report filter
- Consultation Paper (20) Apply Consultation Paper filter
- Report (20) Apply Report filter
- Letter (14) Apply Letter filter
- Guidelines & Recommendations (8) Apply Guidelines & Recommendations filter
- Compliance table (5) Apply Compliance table filter
- Q&A (5) Apply Q&A filter
- CESR Document (3) Apply CESR Document filter
- Technical Standards (3) Apply Technical Standards filter
- Annual Report (2) Apply Annual Report filter
Date | Ref. | Title | Section | Type | Download | Info | Summary | Related Documents | Translated versions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
13/04/2022 | PROC/2021/14 | Open procurement procedure – ADMS – DEADLINE 14/06/2022 – 23:59 | Procurement | ONGOING Procedure | PDF 104.91 KB |
This public procurement procedure is for “Application Development, Maintenance and Support”: Please note that registration in the eTendering website will give you access to the following functionalities:
ESMA strongly advises registering and subscribing to ensure that no information related to the tender procedure is missed. |
|||
29/03/2022 | PROC/2021/03 | Open procurement procedure – Delivery of Professional Technical Skills Development Trainings – DEADLINE 03/05/2022 – 15:00 | Procurement | ONGOING Procedure | PDF 127.53 KB |
This public procurement procedure is for “ Delivery of Professional Technical Skills Development Trainings”:
ESMA strongly advises registering and subscribing to ensure that no information related to the tender procedure is missed. |
|||
10/04/2019 | JC 2019 26 | Joint ESA advice on the need for legislative improvements relating to ICT risk management requirements | Innovation and Products, Joint Committee | Technical Advice | PDF 1.34 MB |
||||
10/04/2019 | JC 2019 25 | Joint ESA advice on the costs and benefits of developing a coherent cyber resilience testing framework for significant market participants and infrastructures | Innovation and Products, Joint Committee | Technical Advice | PDF 785.49 KB |
||||
19/09/2019 | ESMA70-155-8524 | ESMA Opinion CNMV revised Accepted Market Practice | Market Abuse, Market Integrity | Opinion | PDF 520.92 KB |
||||
31/01/2020 | ESMA70-155-7850 | Opinion- Relating to the intended Accepted Market Practice on liquidity contracts notified by the Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa (Consob) | Market Abuse | Opinion | PDF 407.58 KB |
||||
31/05/2021 | ESMA70-155-11961 | Opinion on AMF AMP | Market Abuse, Market Integrity | Opinion | PDF 1.77 MB |
||||
13/07/2017 | ESMA70-154-270 | Opinion to support supervisory convergence in the area of secondary markets in the context of the United Kingdom withdrawing from the European Union | Brexit, MiFID - Secondary Markets, Supervisory convergence | Opinion | PDF 181.69 KB |
||||
25/04/2017 | ESMA70-145-76 | Points for convergence in relation to MAR accepted market practices on liquidity contracts | Market Abuse, Market Integrity | Opinion | PDF 166.37 KB |
||||
13/04/2018 | ESMA70-145-442 | ESMA Opinion on AMF Accepted Market Practice on liquidity contracts | Market Abuse, Market Integrity | Opinion | PDF 542.91 KB |
||||
30/05/2017 | ESMA70-145-103 | Communication on launch of reference data submission under MAR | Market Abuse, Market Integrity | Opinion | PDF 132.12 KB |
||||
01/10/2019 | ESMA63-313-528 | Financial Regulation of the European Securities and Markets Authority | Management Board, Procurement | Decision | PDF 445.94 KB |
||||
12/01/2017 | ESMA50-1215332076-23 | Opinion on the impact of the exclusion of fund management companies from the scope of the MiFIR intervention powers | Innovation and Products | Opinion | PDF 224.29 KB |
||||
31/05/2017 | ESMA42-110-433 | General Principles to support supervisory convergence in the context of the UK withdrawing from the EU | Brexit, Supervisory convergence | Opinion | PDF 182.68 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority’s (ESMA) competence to deliver an opin-ion is based on Article 29(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council (ESMA Regulation). In accordance with Article 44(1) of the ESMA Regulation, the Board of Supervisors has adopted this opinion. |
|||
13/07/2017 | ESMA35-45-344 | Opinion to support supervisory convergence in the area of investment management in the context of the United Kingdom withdrawing from the European Union | Brexit, Fund Management, Supervisory convergence | Opinion | PDF 246.6 KB |
||||
13/07/2017 | ESMA35-43-762 | Opinion to support supervisory convergence in the area of investment firms in the context of the United Kingdom withdrawing from the European Union | Brexit, MiFID - Investor Protection, Supervisory convergence | Opinion | PDF 236.23 KB |
||||
17/03/2022 | ESA 2022 15 | EU financial regulators warn consumers on the risks of crypto-assets | Innovation and Products, Joint Committee, MiFID - Investor Protection, Warnings and publications for investors | Investor Warning | PDF 118.67 KB |
bgcsdadeelesetfifrgahrhuitltlvmtnlplptroskslsv | |||
17/06/2016 | 2016/982 | Opinion on inside information disclosure under the Market Abuse Regulation | Market Abuse | Opinion | PDF 278.89 KB |
||||
03/02/2015 | 2015/224 | ESMA’s technical advice on possible delegated acts concerning the Market Abuse Regulation | Market Abuse | Technical Advice | PDF 1021.03 KB |
This advice:• specifies the MAR market manipulation indicators, by providing examples of practices that may constitute market manipulation as well as proposing “additional” indicators of market manipulation; • recommends to set the minimum thresholds that exempt certain market participants in the emission allowance market from publicly disclosing inside information at six million tonnes of CO2eq per year and at 2,430 MW rated thermal input;• suggests the way to determine to which regulator delays in disclosure of inside information needs to be notified. • provides clarifications on the enhanced disclosure of managers’ transactions. - ESMA recommends disclosing any acquisition, disposal, subscription or exchange of financial instruments of the relevant issuer or related financial instruments carried out by managers,, further illustrated through a non-exhaustive list of types of transactions subject to this obligation. . ESMA also clarifies the transactions that can be allowed by the issuer during a closed period when normally managers are prohibited to trade; and• proposes procedures and arrangements to ensure sound whistleblowing infrastructures – i.e. EU national regulators should allow the receipt of reports of infringements, including appropriate communication channels and guarantee the protection of reporting and reported persons, with respect to their identity and their personal data. Next steps ESMA has sent its technical advice to the European Commission for its consideration in drafting its implementing standards regarding MAR. ESMA’s regulatory technical standards regarding MAR will be delivered in July 2015. | |||
27/03/2014 | 2014/332 | Structured Retail Products- Good practices for product governance arrangements | MiFID - Investor Protection, Innovation and Products | Opinion | PDF 203.1 KB |
Legal basis 1. Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 (ESMA Regulation) sets out the European Securities and Markets Authority’s (ESMA) scope of action, tasks and powers which include “enhancing customer protection”, and “foster[ing] investor protection”. 2. In order to continue delivering on this investor protection statutory objective, ESMA is issuing this opinion on certain aspects linked to the manufacturing and distribution of structured retail products (SRP). This opinion takes into account relevant work done in this field both at European and interna-tional level. 3. This opinion is without prejudice to the requirements for the provision of investment services and activities established in the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) and its implementing measures (notably, Directive 2006/73/EC), the regulatory developments arising from the MiFID review or existing product rules that may apply to SRPs. 4. ESMA’s competence to deliver an opinion is based on Article 29(1) (a) of the ESMA Regulation. In accordance with Article 44(1) of the ESMA Regulation, the Board of Supervisors has adopted this opinion. Background 5. In its July 2013 report on ‘Retailisation in the EU’ , ESMA highlighted that, from a consumer protec-tion perspective, retail investors may face difficulties in understanding the drivers of risks and returns of structured products. If retail investors do not properly understand the risk and reward profile of structured products, and if the products are not properly assessed against the risk appetite of retail investors, retail investors might be exposed to unexpected losses and this might lead to complaints, reputational risks for manufacturers and distributors, and a loss of confidence in the regulatory framework and, more broadly, in financial markets. 6. In 2013, ESMA mapped the measures adopted in the EU Member States in relation to complex products in order to identify issues and to better understand the rationale behind national initiatives (by looking at similarities and differences in the various approaches, and reviewing how complexity has been treated in the different EU Members States). 7. As a result, ESMA has developed a broad set of non-exhaustive examples of good practices, attached as Annex 1 hereto, illustrating arrangements that firms - taking into account the nature, scale and complexity of their business - could put in place to improve their ability to deliver on investor protection regarding, in particular, (i) the complexity of the SRPs they manufacture or distribute, (ii) the nature and range of the investment services and activities undertaken in the course of that business, and (iii) the type of investors they target. These good practices should also be a helpful tool for competent authorities in carrying out their supervisory action. Opinion 8. ESMA considers that sound product governance arrangements are fundamental for investor protec-tion purposes, and can reduce the need for product intervention actions by competent authorities. 9. ESMA considers that, when supervising firms manufacturing or distributing an SRP, competent authorities should promote, in their supervisory approaches, the examples of good practices for firms set out in Annex 1 hereto. 10. Although the good practices set out in Annex 1 hereto focus on structured products sold to retail investors, ESMA considers that they may also be a relevant reference for other types of financial in-struments (such as asset-backed securities, or contingent convertible bonds), as well as when financial instruments are being sold to professional clients. 11. The exposure to risk is an intrinsic feature of investment products. The good practices set out in Annex 1 refer to product governance arrangements and do not (and cannot) aim at removing investment risk from products. |