ESMA LIBRARY

The ESMA Library contains all ESMA documents. Please use the search and filter options to find specific documents.
126
DOCUMENTS

REFINE YOUR SEARCH

Sections

Type of document

Your filters
Vacancy X Opinion X Decision X Guidelines & Recommendations X Securities Financing Transactions X Trade Repositories X Transparency X Joint Committee X Corporate Disclosure X Market Abuse X Board of Appeal X
Reset all filters

Pages

Date Ref. Title Section Type Download Info Summary Related Documents Translated versions
22/12/2014 JC/GL/2014/01/IT Allegato I. Modello per il processo di mappatura del conglomerato finanziario (allegato JC 2014 070) Guidelines and Technical standards, Joint Committee Guidelines & Recommendations XLSX
68.26 KB
22/12/2014 JC/GL/2014/01/RO Anexa I: Formular pentru procesul de mapare aferent conglomeratului financiar (Anexa 2014 070 a Guidelines and Technical standards, Joint Committee Guidelines & Recommendations XLSX
66.2 KB
22/12/2014 JC/GL/2014/01/PT Anexo I: Modelo para o processo de levantamento do conglomerado financeiro (JC 2014 070 Anexo) Guidelines and Technical standards, Joint Committee Guidelines & Recommendations XLSX
68.14 KB
22/12/2014 JC/GL/2014/01/ES Anexo I: Plantilla para el proceso de asignación del conglomerado financiero (Anexo 2014 070 del Comité Mixto) Guidelines and Technical standards, Joint Committee Guidelines & Recommendations XLSX
68.87 KB
22/12/2014 JC/GL/2014/01/DE Anhang I: Vorlage für das Mapping-Verfahren für Finanzkonglomerate (ABl. 2014 070 Anhang) Guidelines and Technical standards, Joint Committee Guidelines & Recommendations XLSX
68.05 KB
22/12/2014 JC/GL/2014/01/MT Anness I: Mudell għall-proċess ta’ mmappjar għall-konglomerat finanzjarju (Anness JC 2014 070) Guidelines and Technical standards, Joint Committee Guidelines & Recommendations XLSX
68.01 KB
22/12/2014 JC/GL/2014/01/FR Annexe I: modèle pour le processus de cartographie du conglomérat financier (annexe JC 2014 070) Guidelines and Technical standards, Joint Committee Guidelines & Recommendations XLSX
68.7 KB
27/02/2019 BoA D 2019 01, 02, 03 and 04 Appeal by Svenska Handelsbanken AB, Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB, Swedbank A and Nordea Bank Abp against the European Securities and Markets Authority Board of Appeal Decision PDF
829.04 KB
25/08/2014 JC/2014/43 fi Arvopaperialaa (ESMA) ja pankkialaa (EPV) koskevat ohjeet valitusten käsittelystä Joint Committee, Guidelines and Technical standards Guidelines & Recommendations PDF
150.96 KB		 The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) and the European Banking Authority (EBA) published today their Joint Committee final Report on guidelines for handling consumer complaints in the securities and banking sectors. The document aims to increase market confidence and for the benefit of consumers and firms alike it will ensure a harmonised approach to handling complaints for all 28 EU Member States and across all financial services sectors.The final report published today is part of the efforts of the European Supervisory Authorities to bring further supervisory convergence across the securities and banking sectors. It was developed on the basis of the existing complaints-handling guidelines established by EIOPA (the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority) for the insurance sector. The report was launched for a public consultation last year and this final version takes into consideration the feedback received.ESMA and the EBA consider that these guidelines will ensure a consistent approach to complaints-handling across the EU. Consumers can purchase financial services and products in the investment, banking and insurance sectors across the entire EU Single Market and these guidelines will allow them to refer to a single set of complaints-handling arrangements. EU consumers will therefore be able to rely on the same approach irrespective of what type of product they have purchased and where they have purchased it.In addition to strengthening consumer protection -a key statutory objective for ESMA and for the EBA-, the guidelines will also allow firms, some of which sell products from more than one sector across the EU, to streamline and standardise their own complaints-handling arrangements. National regulators too will be able to supervise the same harmonised requirements across all sectors of financial services in their own jurisdictions.The guidelines will be translated into the official languages of the European Union (EU) and they will become applicable two months after the date of publication of their translations.
22/12/2014 JC/GL/2014/01 LT Bendrosiosgairės dėl priežiūros praktikos, kuri susijusi su finansinių konglomeratų priežiūros veiklos koordinavimo tvarkos suderinimu, konvergencijos Guidelines and Technical standards, Joint Committee Guidelines & Recommendations PDF
227.31 KB
22/12/2014 JC/GL/2014/01/NL Bijlage I: Model voor het in kaart brengen (mapping) van het financiële conglomeraat (JC 2014 07 Guidelines and Technical standards, Joint Committee Guidelines & Recommendations XLSX
67.95 KB
22/12/2014 JC/GL/2014/01/DA Bilag I: Skema til brug for kortlægningen af det finansielle konglomerat (JC 2014 070 Bilag) Guidelines and Technical standards, Joint Committee Guidelines & Recommendations XLS
93.5 KB
22/12/2014 JC/GL/2014/01/SV Bilaga I: Mall för kartläggningsprocessen för det finansiella konglomeratet (JC 2014 070 Guidelines and Technical standards, Joint Committee Guidelines & Recommendations XLSX
62.26 KB
26/01/2016 BOA 2016 001 BoA 2016- 001 (Decision Kluge v EBA) Board of Appeal Decision PDF
196.32 KB
08/10/2019 boa-2019-d-05_decision BOA decision creditreform_rating_ag_vs_eba Board of Appeal Decision PDF
922.78 KB
30/11/2018 boa30.18 BoA Decision SEB appeal 30 November 2018 Board of Appeal Decision PDF
416.77 KB
24/06/2013 BoA 2013-008 Board of Appeal Decision Joint Committee, Board of Appeal Decision PDF
242.72 KB		 The joint Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities (EBA, ESMA and EIOPA) has published today its decision in an appeal brought by an Estonian company against a decision of the EBA. It concerned the question whether the suitability of the managers of a significant branch of a bank may be a matter within EU law, and not just national law. Allowing the appeal, the Board of Appeal interpreted Directive No. 2006/48/EC consistently with the EBA Guidelines on the assessment of the suitability of members of the management body and key function holders. It came to the conclusion that the “fit and proper” requirement is not restricted to the persons who direct the business of the credit institution. The matter therefore was within the EBA’s powers of investigation. Although the appellant criticised the way in which the EBA dealt with its complaint, the Board of Appeal made it clear that it did not accept that criticism. It considered that the EBA dealt with the complaint in an appropriate manner. The ground on which the appeal was allowed was one of interpretation of the applicable legal provisions. The case was remitted to the EBA to adopt the appropriate decision in accordance with the Board of Appeal’s findings. This is for information only. The decision consists of the signed Decision only. For any enquiries, please contact EIOPA’s Press Office: Anzhelika Mayer Tel.: +49 69 9511 1968
17/07/2014 2014/C1/02 Board of Appeal Decision Joint Committee, Board of Appeal Decision PDF
368.94 KB		 The Joint Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities (the European Banking Authority, the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority and the European Securities and Markets Authority) published its decision in an appeal brought by SV Capital OÜ, an Estonian company, against a decision of the EBA. This was the second appeal to be considered by the Board of Appeal in this matter between the same parties concerning the question whether the suitability of the managers of a significant branch of a bank raised a question of Union law. Following the Board of Appeal’s affirmative decision of 24 June 2013, the appellant requested the EBA to initiate an investigation against the Estonian and Finnish Financial Supervision Authorities because their alleged failure to take action in respect of individuals in the Estonian branch of Nordea Bank Finland PLC whom it was alleged were not fit and proper persons to be key function holders in the bank. The EBA decided that it would not initiate an investigation.  The Board of Appeal decided that the EBA had been right to raise the matter with the national supervisors, but that having done so, it was entitled to take no further action in the light of their responses. The Board accordingly dismissed the appellant’s appeal against the EBA’s decision.
13/01/2014 BoA 2013-014 Board of Appeal Decision Global Private Rating Company v. ESMA Joint Committee, Board of Appeal Decision PDF
361.96 KB		 Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities dismisses appeal made by a refused CRA-applicant against ESMA On 10 January 2014, the Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities handed down its decision on an appeal by the appellant, Global Private Rating Company “Standard Rating” Ltd, against the refusal by the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) to register it as a credit rating agency. This is the first appeal against a decision by ESMA refusing an applicant registration as a credit rating agency. The Board of Appeal unanimously decided that the appeal should be dismissed, and that ESMA’s refusal decision should be confirmed. It stated that it accepted the appellant’s point that the registration of a credit rating agency by ESMA is a new process, and recognised that the procedures will to an extent take time fully to work out. Nevertheless, because of the responsibilities placed on credit rating agencies and their importance in the financial system generally, it considered that the onus must be on an applicant to satisfy ESMA that the relevant requirements are met. The application and its contents must be very clear, and it is not ESMA’s responsibility as regulator to remedy deficiencies.
29/03/2021 Decision BoA D 2021 02 Board of Appeal of the ESAs- decision on "A" vs ESMA Board of Appeal Decision PDF
283 KB

Pages