ESMA LIBRARY

The ESMA Library contains all ESMA documents. Please use the search and filter options to find specific documents.
65
DOCUMENTS

REFINE YOUR SEARCH

Sections

Type of document

Your filters
Q&A X SMSG Advice X Technical Standards X Opinion X Letter X European Single Electronic Format X Innovation and Products X Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors X Securities Financing Transactions X IFRS Supervisory Convergence X Market Abuse X
Reset all filters

Pages

Date Ref. Title Section Type Download Info Summary Related Documents Translated versions
14/06/2012 2012/248 Letter to the IFRS Interpretation Committee- Accouting exposure to Greek sovereign debt Letter PDF
361.61 KB
23/08/2012 2012/464 ESMA Letter to IFRS Interpretations Committee on the scope of IFRS 2 and 3 Letter PDF
203.41 KB
11/01/2013 EBA/BS/2013/001 Letter to EBF on Euribor Letter PDF
101.15 KB
15/01/2013 2013/9 Letter to IFRS IC- Elimination of intercompany profits between an issuer and its joint venture Letter PDF
228.54 KB
21/02/2013 2013/244 Letter to the IFRS regarding discontinued operations- change in disposal method Letter PDF
190.81 KB
14/03/2013 ESA/2013/007 Possible Framework for the Regulation of the Production and Use of Indices Serving as Benchmarks in Financial and other Contracts , Letter PDF
91.91 KB
03/12/2013 2013/1773 Agenda item request, Issues related to the application of IFRS 5 Letter PDF
188.74 KB
03/12/2013 2013/1774 Agenda item request, Classification and measurement of core inventories Letter PDF
162.52 KB
27/03/2014 2014/332 Structured Retail Products- Good practices for product governance arrangements , Opinion PDF
203.1 KB
Legal basis 1.    Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 (ESMA Regulation)  sets out the European Securities and Markets Authority’s (ESMA) scope of action, tasks and powers which include “enhancing customer protection”, and “foster[ing] investor protection”.  2.    In order to continue delivering on this investor protection statutory objective, ESMA is issuing this opinion on certain aspects linked to the manufacturing and distribution of structured retail products (SRP). This opinion takes into account relevant work done in this field both at European and interna-tional level.  3.    This opinion is without prejudice to the requirements for the provision of investment services and activities established in the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID)  and its implementing measures (notably, Directive 2006/73/EC), the regulatory developments arising from the MiFID review or existing product rules that may apply to SRPs.  4.    ESMA’s competence to deliver an opinion is based on Article 29(1) (a) of the ESMA Regulation. In accordance with Article 44(1) of the ESMA Regulation, the Board of Supervisors has adopted this opinion. Background 5.    In its July 2013 report on ‘Retailisation in the EU’ , ESMA highlighted that, from a consumer protec-tion perspective, retail investors may face difficulties in understanding the drivers of risks and returns of structured products. If retail investors do not properly understand the risk and reward profile of structured products, and if the products are not properly assessed against the risk appetite of retail investors, retail investors might be exposed to unexpected losses and this might lead to complaints, reputational risks for manufacturers and distributors, and a loss of confidence in the regulatory framework and, more broadly, in financial markets. 6.    In 2013, ESMA mapped the measures adopted in the EU Member States in relation to complex products in order to identify issues and to better understand the rationale behind national initiatives (by looking at similarities and differences in the various approaches, and reviewing how complexity has been treated in the different EU Members States). 7.    As a result, ESMA has developed a broad set of non-exhaustive examples of good practices, attached as Annex 1 hereto, illustrating arrangements that firms - taking into account the nature, scale and complexity of their business - could put in place to improve their ability to deliver on investor protection regarding, in particular, (i) the complexity of the SRPs they manufacture or distribute, (ii) the nature and range of the investment services and activities undertaken in the course of that business, and (iii) the type of investors they target. These good practices should also be a helpful tool for competent authorities in carrying out their supervisory action. Opinion 8.    ESMA considers that sound product governance arrangements are fundamental for investor protec-tion purposes, and can reduce the need for product intervention actions by competent authorities. 9.    ESMA considers that, when supervising firms manufacturing or distributing an SRP, competent authorities should promote, in their supervisory approaches, the examples of good practices for firms set out in Annex 1 hereto. 10.    Although the good practices set out in Annex 1 hereto focus on structured products sold to retail investors, ESMA considers that they may also be a relevant reference for other types of financial in-struments (such as asset-backed securities, or contingent convertible bonds), as well as when financial instruments are being sold to professional clients. 11.    The exposure to risk is an intrinsic feature of investment products. The good practices set out in Annex 1 refer to product governance arrangements and do not (and cannot) aim at removing investment risk from products.
18/12/2014 2014/1378 Opinion- Investment-based crowdfunding Opinion PDF
460.92 KB
Crowdfunding is a means of raising finance for projects from ‘the crowd’ often by means of an internet-based platform through which project owners ‘pitch’ their idea to potential backers, who are typically not professional investors.  It takes many forms, not all of which involve the potential for a financial return.  ESMA’s focus is on crowdfunding which involves investment, as distinct from donation, non-monetary reward or loan agreement.  Crowdfunding is relatively young and business models are evolving. EU financial services rules were not designed with the industry in mind. Within investment-based crowdfunding a range of different operational structures are used so it is not straightforward to map crowdfunding platforms’ activities to those regulated under EU legislation. Member States and NCAs have been working out how to treat crowdfunding, with some dealing with issues case-by-case, some seeking to clarify how crowdfunding fits into existing rules and others introducing specific requirements.To assist NCAs and market participants, and to promote regulatory and supervisory convergence, ESMA has assessed typical investment-based crowdfunding business models and how they could evolve, risks typically involved for project owners, investors and the platforms themselves and the likely components of an appropriate regulatory regime. ESMA then prepared a detailed analysis of how the typical business models map across to the existing EU legislation, set out in this document.
23/02/2015 2015/419 IFRS IC Agenda Item Request: Measurement of minimum funding requirement in pension asset ceiling test Letter PDF
27.23 KB
05/06/2015 2015/911 ESMA Submission to IFRS IC on Application of IAS 12 Letter PDF
29.66 KB
01/07/2015 2015/1005 Questions and Answers: Investment-based crowdfunding: money laundering/terrorist financing Q&A PDF
157.73 KB
18/08/2015 2015/1258 ESMA submission to IFRS IC on IAS 20 Letter PDF
79.26 KB
25/09/2015 2015/1462 ESMA opinion on accounting for Deposit Guarantee Scheme , Opinion PDF
127.91 KB
28/09/2015 2015-ESMA-1455 Final Report MAR TS Technical Standards PDF
1.77 MB
09/02/2016 2016/235 Comment letter on Taxonomy due process , , Letter PDF
84.24 KB
18/02/2016 2015/SMSG/036 SMSG Advice on ESEF , SMSG Advice PDF
109.63 KB
01/04/2016 2016/419 Q&A Market Abuse Directive Q&A PDF
175.08 KB
17/06/2016 2016/982 Opinion on inside information disclosure under the Market Abuse Regulation Opinion PDF
278.89 KB

Pages