REFINE YOUR SEARCH
Type of document
|Date||Ref.||Title||Section||Type||Download||Info||Summary||Related Documents||Translated versions|
|19/07/2022||ESMA74-362-893||QAs on SFTR data reporting||Post Trading, Securities Financing Transactions, Trade Repositories||Q&A||PDF
|23/06/2022||ESMA70-145-114||Q&A on the Benchmarks Regulation (BMR)||Benchmarks, Supervisory convergence||Q&A||PDF
|07/06/2022||ESMA81-393-477||Compliance table on Guidelines on methodology oversight function and record keeping requirements||Benchmarks, Guidelines and Technical standards||Compliance table||PDF
|24/03/2022||ESMA41-356-271||Decision of the Board of Supervisors to adopt supervisory measures and impose fines in respect of infringements committed by REGIS-TR, S.A||Board of Supervisors, Trade Repositories||Decision||PDF
|28/02/2022||ESMA70-1861941480-52||Q&A on EMIR implementation||Post Trading, Trade Repositories||Q&A||PDF
|28/01/2022||ESMA50-164-5210||Compliance table on Guidelines on outsourcing to cloud service providers||Guidelines and Technical standards, Innovation and Products||Compliance table||PDF
|23/09/2021||ESMA41-356-233||Decision- UnaVista Limited||Trade Repositories||Decision||PDF
|12/07/2021||ESMA41-356-187||Decision- DTCC Derivatives Repository||Board of Supervisors, Trade Repositories||Decision||PDF
|08/03/2021||ESMA70-151-2536||compliance table Guidelines APC Measures||Guidelines and Technical standards, Trade Repositories||Compliance table||PDF
|11/03/2020||ESMA70-156-1434||Compliance table for Guidelines on non-significant benchmarks (ESMA70-145-1209)||Benchmarks, Guidelines and Technical standards||Compliance table||PDF
|10/04/2019||JC 2019 26||Joint ESA advice on the need for legislative improvements relating to ICT risk management requirements||Innovation and Products, Joint Committee||Technical Advice||PDF
|10/04/2019||JC 2019 25||Joint ESA advice on the costs and benefits of developing a coherent cyber resilience testing framework for significant market participants and infrastructures||Innovation and Products, Joint Committee||Technical Advice||PDF
|31/03/2016||2016/408||Decision to adopt a supervisory measure taking the form of a public notice and to impose a fine in accordance with Statement of Findings in accordance with Articles 64(5), 65, 67 and 73 of Regulation (EC) No 648/2012 EMIR||Trade Repositories||Decision||PDF
Decision to adopt a supervisory measure taking the form of a public notice and to impose a fine in accordance with Statement of Findings in accordance with Articles 64(5), 65, 67 and 73 of Regulation (EC) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories
Public notice regarding negligent breach by DTCC Derivatives Repository Ltd of its legal obligation to ensure immediate access for regulators to data reported under EMIR
DTCC Derivatives Repository Ltd (‘DDRL’) is a trade repository registered in the European Union and is part of the DTCC group which includes a number of companies providing post-trading services to the global financial services industry. DDRL was registered by ESMA as a trade repository under Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories (‘EMIR’) on 7 November 2013. ESMA has responsibilities for the supervision and enforcement of provisions under EMIR concerning DDRL and other trade repositories registered in the EU.
In May 2014, ESMA’s supervisory team became aware of delays in providing regulators with access to data reported to DDRL under EMIR. Following further examination, the supervisory team formed the view that there were serious indications of the possible existence of facts liable to constitute one or more of the infringements listed in EMIR. The matter was accordingly referred to an independent investigation officer (the ‘IIO’). The IIO considered the evidence referred to him and conducted further investigations, before submitting his findings to ESMA’s Board of Supervisors (the ‘ESMA Board’).
Based on the findings of the IIO and the evidence put before it, the ESMA Board found on 23 March 2016 that an examination of the facts showed that DDRL had committed the following infringement under EMIR and had done so negligently. DDRL committed an infringement of EMIR by not allowing regulators and supervisors direct and immediate access to the details of derivatives contracts they need to fulfil their responsibilities and mandates.
|18/02/2016||2015/SMSG/036||SMSG Advice on ESEF||European Single Electronic Format, Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group||SMSG Advice||PDF
|01/07/2015||2015/1005||Questions and Answers: Investment-based crowdfunding: money laundering/terrorist financing||Innovation and Products||Q&A||PDF