ESMA LIBRARY
The ESMA Library contains all ESMA documents. Please use the search and filter options to find specific documents.
103
REFINE YOUR SEARCH
Sections
- (-) Remove Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors filter Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors
- (-) Remove Securitisation filter Securitisation
- (-) Remove Transparency filter Transparency
- (-) Remove Corporate Governance filter Corporate Governance
- CESR Archive (202) Apply CESR Archive filter
- Post Trading (115) Apply Post Trading filter
- MiFID - Secondary Markets (101) Apply MiFID - Secondary Markets filter
- Corporate Information (99) Apply Corporate Information filter
- Joint Committee (84) Apply Joint Committee filter
- Fund Management (66) Apply Fund Management filter
- Board of Supervisors (61) Apply Board of Supervisors filter
- MiFID - Investor Protection (51) Apply MiFID - Investor Protection filter
- CCP Directorate (49) Apply CCP Directorate filter
- Planning reporting budget (48) Apply Planning reporting budget filter
- Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group (48) Apply Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group filter
- Corporate Disclosure (45) Apply Corporate Disclosure filter
- Management Board (44) Apply Management Board filter
- Credit Rating Agencies (42) Apply Credit Rating Agencies filter
- International cooperation (41) Apply International cooperation filter
- Warnings and publications for investors (38) Apply Warnings and publications for investors filter
- Sustainable finance (35) Apply Sustainable finance filter
- Innovation and Products (31) Apply Innovation and Products filter
- European Single Electronic Format (28) Apply European Single Electronic Format filter
- Supervisory convergence (28) Apply Supervisory convergence filter
- Benchmarks (23) Apply Benchmarks filter
- Market Abuse (23) Apply Market Abuse filter
- Market Integrity (18) Apply Market Integrity filter
- Procurement (18) Apply Procurement filter
- Trading (18) Apply Trading filter
- Corporate Finance (16) Apply Corporate Finance filter
- Trade Repositories (16) Apply Trade Repositories filter
- Prospectus (15) Apply Prospectus filter
- ESMA newsletter (14) Apply ESMA newsletter filter
- IFRS Supervisory Convergence (13) Apply IFRS Supervisory Convergence filter
- Short Selling (13) Apply Short Selling filter
- Careers (12) Apply Careers filter
- Guidelines and Technical standards (11) Apply Guidelines and Technical standards filter
- Securities Financing Transactions (9) Apply Securities Financing Transactions filter
- Brexit (7) Apply Brexit filter
- Market data (7) Apply Market data filter
- Press Releases (6) Apply Press Releases filter
- ITMG (4) Apply ITMG filter
- Board of Appeal (3) Apply Board of Appeal filter
- Crowdfunding (3) Apply Crowdfunding filter
- Speeches (3) Apply Speeches filter
- COVID-19 (2) Apply COVID-19 filter
- IAS Regulation (2) Apply IAS Regulation filter
- MiFID II: Transparency Calculations and DVC (2) Apply MiFID II: Transparency Calculations and DVC filter
- Audit (1) Apply Audit filter
- Vacancies (1) Apply Vacancies filter
Type of document
- (-) Remove Reference filter Reference
- (-) Remove Q&A filter Q&A
- (-) Remove CESR Document filter CESR Document
- (-) Remove Technical Standards filter Technical Standards
- Report (54) Apply Report filter
- Press Release (42) Apply Press Release filter
- Final Report (38) Apply Final Report filter
- Consultation Paper (16) Apply Consultation Paper filter
- Letter (13) Apply Letter filter
- Speech (10) Apply Speech filter
- Statement (8) Apply Statement filter
- Annual Report (3) Apply Annual Report filter
- Opinion (3) Apply Opinion filter
- Guidelines & Recommendations (2) Apply Guidelines & Recommendations filter
- Compliance table (1) Apply Compliance table filter
- Technical Advice (1) Apply Technical Advice filter
Your filters
Q&A X CESR Document X Technical Standards X Reference X Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors X Securitisation X Transparency X Corporate Governance X
Reset all filtersDate | Ref. | Title | Section | Type | Download | Info | Summary | Related Documents | Translated versions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
29/06/2012 | 2012/415 | Call for Evidence on Empty Voting | Transparency, Corporate Disclosure | CESR Document | PDF 275.66 KB |
ESMA launched a Call for Evidence on Empty Voting in September 2011 to analyse the potential issues and concerns raised by the practice of empty voting and to examine whether there was a possible need for further action. An analysis of the responses received to the consultation has led ESMA to conclude that there is insufficient evidence to justify any regulatory action at the European level at present. | |||
11/01/2013 | EBA/REC/2013/01 | EBA Recommendations on supervisory oversight of activities related to banks’ participation in the Euribor panel | Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors | Reference | PDF 207.84 KB |
||||
11/03/2013 | 2013/280 | Vacancy notice- Chair of Committee drafting a proxy advising industry Code of Conduct | Corporate Finance, Corporate Governance | Reference | PDF 102.91 KB |
||||
20/03/2013 | 2013/318 | Feedback Statement on proposed amendments to the ESMA update of the CESR recommendations for the consistent implementation of the Prospectuses Regulation regarding mineral companies | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure, Transparency | CESR Document | PDF 265.19 KB |
||||
12/11/2013 | 2013/1643 | Cover Note- Public statement containing information on shareholder cooperation and acting in concert under the Takeover Bids Directive (ESMA/2013/1642) | Corporate Disclosure, Corporate Governance | Reference | PDF 145.01 KB |
In accordance with its mandate to take appropriate action in the context of takeover bids as per Article 1.3 of Regulation (EU) 1095/2010 (ESMA Regulation), ESMA is releasing a public statement on shareholder cooperation and acting in concert under the Takeover Bids Directive (Directive 2004/25/EC). This statement has been prepared following the review and report by the European Commission on the application of the Takeover Bids Directive and is based on information collected about the practices and application of that Directive. The statement has been prepared in order to help shareholders identify activities in relation to which they can cooperate (insofar as those activities are available to them under national company law), without that cooperation, in and of itself, leading to a conclusion that the shareholders are acting in concert and thus being at risk of having to make a mandatory bid under the Takeover Bids Directive. These activities are presented in the statement in the form of a “White List”. The statement has been prepared by the Takeover Bids Network, a permanent working group operating under the auspices of ESMA that promotes exchange of information on practices and application of the Takeover Bids Directive across the European Economic Area, thereby strengthening a common supervisory culture. The Takeover Bids Network is a specialist group composed of the national competent authorities appointed under the Takeover Bids Directive. The competent authorities represented on the ESMA Board of Supervisors are not in all cases appointed as competent authorities within the Takeover Bids Directive. The authorities not represented on the Board of Supervisors but competent within the area of takeovers are the Austrian Takeover Commission, the Irish Takeover Panel, the Oslo Stock Exchange of Norway, the Takeover Panel of Sweden and the Takeover Panel of the United Kingdom. These five authorities have contributed to the public statement and will have regard to it in the same manner as the other members of the Takeover Bids Network when assessing whether shareholders are acting in concert under their national takeover rules. | |||
28/02/2014 | 2014/205 | Call for expressions of interest: Group of Economic Advisers for ESMA’s Committee for Economic and Markets Analysis | Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors | Reference | PDF 158.95 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) is seeking to appoint new members to its Group of Economic Advisors (GEA) for the Committee for Economic and Markets Analysis (CEMA). This follows the expiry of the term of the current GEA. CEMA has established the GEA in order to benefit from the expertise of stakeholders specialised in the topics of financial stability and general economic research related to financial markets. CEMA looks to this group to provide it with advice regarding our work related to financial stability and economic background analysis for the regulatory and supervisory tasks of ESMA. The closing date for application is 25 April 2014. Application form | |||
11/06/2014 | ESMA/WP/2 | ESMA Working Paper- The systemic dimension of hedge fund illiquidity and prime brokerage | Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors | Reference | PDF 839.63 KB |
We analyse the potentially vulnerable and systemically relevant financial intermediation chain established by hedge funds and prime brokers. Our dataset covers the 306 largest global hedge funds and their prime brokers over the period July 2001 to December 2011. The study illustrates that hedge funds and prime brokers act as complementary trading partners in normal times. However, we observe that this form of financial intermediation may be severely impaired in times of market distress. This can be explained by the hoarding of liquid securities by prime brokers who are eager to avert runs by their clients. | |||
11/06/2014 | ESMA/WP/1 | ESMA Working Paper- Monitoring the European CDS market through networks: Implications for contagion risks | Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors | Reference | PDF 1005.17 KB |
Based on a unique data set referencing exposures on single name credit default swaps (CDS) on European reference entities, we study the structure and the topology of the European CDS market and its evolution from 2008 to 2012, resorting to network analysis. The structural features revealed show bilateral CDS exposures describing growing scale-free networks whose highly interconnected hubs constitute both a strength and weakness for the stability of the system. The potential “super spreaders” of financial contagion, identified as the most interconnected participants, consist mostly of banks. For some of them net notional exposures may be particularly large relative to their total common equity. Our findings also point to the importance of some non-dealer/non-bank participants belonging to the shadow banking system. | |||
29/09/2014 | 2014/1187 | Draft Regulatory Technical Standards on major shareholdings and an indicative list of financial instruments subject to notification requirements under the revised Transparency Directive | Corporate Disclosure, Transparency | Technical Standards | PDF 810.07 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has published its draft Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) under the revised Transparency Directive relating to the notification of major shareholdings. | |||
15/01/2015 | ESMA/WP/2015/1 | ESMA Working Paper- Real-world and risk-neutral probabilities in the regulation on the transparency of structured products | Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors | Reference | PDF 480.24 KB |
The price of derivatives (and hence of structured products) can be calculated as the discounted value of expected future payoffs, assuming standard hypotheses on frictionless and complete markets and on the type of stochastic processes for the price of the underlying. However, the probabilities used in the pricing process do not represent “real” probabilities of future events, because they are based on the assumption that market participants are risk-neutral. This paper reviews the relevant mathematical finance literature, and clarifies that the risk-neutrality hypothesis is acceptable for pricing, but not to forecast the future value of an asset. Therefore, we argue that regulatory initiatives that mandate intermediaries to give retail investors information on the probability that, at a future date, the value of a derivative will be higher or lower than a given threshold (so-called “probability scenarios”) should explicitly reference probabilities that take into account the risk premium (so-called “real-world” probabilities). We also argue that, though probability scenarios may look appealing to foster investor protection, their practical implementation, if based on the right economic approach, raises significant regulatory and enforcement problems. | |||
14/09/2015 | 2015/1291 | Risk Dashboard No. 3, 2105 | Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors | Reference | PDF 848.31 KB |
||||
25/09/2015 | 2015/1463 reply form ESEF | Form to reply ESEF | Corporate Disclosure, Transparency | Reference | DOCX 784.27 KB |
||||
25/09/2015 | 2015/1463 reply form ESEF CBA | Form to reply ESEF CBA | Corporate Disclosure, European Single Electronic Format, Transparency | Reference | DOCX 872.33 KB |
||||
25/09/2015 | 2015/1460 | ESMA Final Report on DRAFT RTS on EEAP | Transparency | Technical Standards | PDF 1.62 MB |
||||
22/10/2015 | 2015/1596 | Standard form for disclosure of Home Member State | Corporate Disclosure, Transparency | Reference | DOCX 344.53 KB |
bgcsdadeelesetfifrhrhuitltlvmtnlplptroslsksv | |||
22/10/2015 | 2015/1597 | Standard form for major holdings | Corporate Disclosure, Transparency | Reference | DOCX 350.81 KB |
||||
22/10/2015 | 2015/1598 | Indicative List of Financial Instruments | Corporate Disclosure, Transparency | Reference | DOCX 338.2 KB |
||||
22/10/2015 | 2015/1599 | ESMA briefing on amended TD documents | Corporate Disclosure, Transparency | Reference | PDF 133.16 KB |
||||
16/12/2015 | 2015/1882 | Risk Dashboard No. 4, 2015 | Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors | Reference | PDF 931.3 KB |
||||
17/12/2015 | 2015/1885 | ESMA Briefing Note on ESEF CP | European Single Electronic Format, Transparency | Reference | PDF 138.49 KB |