ESMA LIBRARY
REFINE YOUR SEARCH
Sections
- (-) Remove Post Trading filter Post Trading
- (-) Remove Fund Management filter Fund Management
- (-) Remove Market Abuse filter Market Abuse
- (-) Remove Crowdfunding filter Crowdfunding
- CESR Archive (191) Apply CESR Archive filter
- MiFID - Investor Protection (47) Apply MiFID - Investor Protection filter
- Guidelines and Technical standards (45) Apply Guidelines and Technical standards filter
- MiFID - Secondary Markets (44) Apply MiFID - Secondary Markets filter
- Credit Rating Agencies (40) Apply Credit Rating Agencies filter
- Joint Committee (35) Apply Joint Committee filter
- Corporate Disclosure (24) Apply Corporate Disclosure filter
- CCP Directorate (22) Apply CCP Directorate filter
- Prospectus (19) Apply Prospectus filter
- Supervisory convergence (15) Apply Supervisory convergence filter
- Benchmarks (12) Apply Benchmarks filter
- Market Integrity (12) Apply Market Integrity filter
- Securitisation (11) Apply Securitisation filter
- Short Selling (11) Apply Short Selling filter
- Trading (9) Apply Trading filter
- Innovation and Products (8) Apply Innovation and Products filter
- Trade Repositories (7) Apply Trade Repositories filter
- Sustainable finance (6) Apply Sustainable finance filter
- Transparency (6) Apply Transparency filter
- Securities Financing Transactions (5) Apply Securities Financing Transactions filter
- Corporate Finance (4) Apply Corporate Finance filter
- Corporate Governance (4) Apply Corporate Governance filter
- IFRS Supervisory Convergence (4) Apply IFRS Supervisory Convergence filter
- Market data (4) Apply Market data filter
- Brexit (2) Apply Brexit filter
- Corporate Information (2) Apply Corporate Information filter
- Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors (2) Apply Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors filter
- COVID-19 (1) Apply COVID-19 filter
- European Single Electronic Format (1) Apply European Single Electronic Format filter
- MiFID II: Transparency Calculations and DVC (1) Apply MiFID II: Transparency Calculations and DVC filter
Type of document
- (-) Remove Consultation Paper filter Consultation Paper
- (-) Remove Compliance table filter Compliance table
- (-) Remove Technical Advice filter Technical Advice
- (-) Remove Q&A filter Q&A
- Reference (172) Apply Reference filter
- Guidelines & Recommendations (128) Apply Guidelines & Recommendations filter
- Final Report (90) Apply Final Report filter
- Press Release (76) Apply Press Release filter
- Letter (59) Apply Letter filter
- Report (52) Apply Report filter
- Statement (46) Apply Statement filter
- Opinion (34) Apply Opinion filter
- Speech (34) Apply Speech filter
- Technical Standards (13) Apply Technical Standards filter
- Annual Report (3) Apply Annual Report filter
- CESR Document (1) Apply CESR Document filter
- SMSG Advice (1) Apply SMSG Advice filter
Date | Ref. | Title | Section | Type | Download | Info | Summary | Related Documents | Translated versions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
12/07/2013 | 2013/925 | The Clearing Obligation under EMIR | Post Trading | Consultation Paper | PDF 773.26 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) is publishing this discussion paper in order to seek stakeholders’ views on the preparation of the regulatory technical standards ESMA is required to draft under Article 5(2) “Clearing Obligation Procedure” of the Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and Council on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories (EMIR). The input from stakeholders will help ESMA in the development of the relevant technical standards to be drafted and submitted to the European Commission for endorsement in the form of Commission Regulations, i.e. a legally binding instrument directly applicable in all Member States of the European Union. One essential element in the development of draft technical standards is the analysis of the costs and benefits that those legal provisions will imply. Input in this respect and any supportive data will be highly appreciated and kept confidential where required. Please respond to the consultation using the response template. The closing date for responses is 12 September 2013. |
|||
23/06/2015 | JC/DC/2015/01 | Technical Discussion Paper (DP) on the PRIIPs Key Information Document (KID) | Fund Management, Joint Committee | Consultation Paper | PDF 1.16 MB |
EBA, EIOPA, and ESMA (the ESAs) welcome comments on this Technical Discussion Paper on Risk, Performance Scenarios and Cost Disclosures in Key Information Documents for Packaged Retail and Insurance-based Investment Products (PRIIPs). The discussion paper is available on the websites of the three ESAs. Comments on this discussion paper can be sent using the response form, via the ESMA website under the heading ‘Your input/Consultations’ by 17 August 2015. Contributions not received in Word, or sent to an email address, or after the deadline, will not be processed. It is important to note that although you may not be able to respond to each and every question, the ESAs would encourage partial responses from stakeholders on those questions that they believe are most relevant to them. Publication of responses All contributions received will be published following the close of the consultation, unless you request otherwise. A standard confidentiality statement in an email message will not be treated as a request for non-disclosure. A confidential response may be requested from us in accordance with the ESAs’ rules on public access to documents. We may consult you if we receive such a request. Any decision we make not to disclose the response is reviewable by the Board of Appeal of the ESAs and the European Ombudsman. Data protection Information on data protection can be found on the different ESAs’ websites under the heading ‘Legal notice’. | |||
27/03/2014 | 2014/312 | Technical advice to the European Commission on the information that competent authorities should provide to ESMA pursuant to Article 67(3) of the AIFMD | Fund Management | Technical Advice | PDF 330.79 KB |
Reasons for publication ESMA is issuing this technical advice in response to the mandate received from the European Commission on 20 December 2013 for advice on the possible content of the delegated act required by Article 67(5) of the AIFMD, concerning the information that EU competent authorities have to provide quarterly to ESMA pursuant to Article 67(3) of the Directive. This information is needed in order to allow ESMA to produce the opinion and the advice required in Article 67(1) of the AIFMD, in relation to the possible extension of the AIFMD passport to non-EU AIFs and non-EU AIFMs. Contents Section II describes the background of the proposal. Section III specifies the timing for the provision of the information to ESMA and lists the information that the competent authorities should provide quarterly to ESMA. The list of information is divided into three parts: the first refers to the information about the functioning of the passport for EU AIFMs; the second deals with the functioning of the national private placement regime for non-EU AIFs and non-EU AIFMs; and the third refers to the issues arising from the functioning of both systems. Finally, Section IV reproduces the mandate for advice issued by the European Commission. Next steps ESMA will cooperate closely with the European Commission in order to facilitate an expeditious adoption of the delegated act required by Article 67(5) of the AIFMD. | |||
24/01/2014 | 2013/1965 | Technical Advice to the Commission on procedural rules to impose fines and periodic penalty payments to Trade Repositories | Post Trading | Technical Advice | PDF 385.87 KB |
Reasons for publication On 29 of April 2013 ESMA received a formal request from the European Commission (the Commission) to provide technical advice to assist the Commission in formulating procedural rules to impose fines and periodic penalty payments to trade repositories (TRs) by delegated act. In order to deliver its advice to the Commission, ESMA consulted market participants regarding the procedural rules to impose fines and periodic penalty payments to TRs. Respondents to the consultation were encouraged to provide the relevant information in support of their arguments or proposals. ESMA published the consultation on 18 October 2013. The market participants could provide their comments until 15 November 2013. In total ESMA received two responses to the consultation. The respondents have required confidential treatment for their input. ESMA would like to thank respondents for providing input. Contents This document sets out a summary of the responses received by ESMA regarding the procedural rules to impose fines and periodic penalty payments to TRs and includes ESMA’s final technical advice to the Commission on the future Regulation on the procedural rules to impose fines and periodic penalty payments to TRs which will be adopted by the Commission in the form of a delegated act. It is worth noting that all major ESMA proposals were supported by respondents and where comments were received ESMA has considered them carefully. Next steps ESMA will follow-up on this work with the Commission towards the adoption of the Commission delegated regulation on procedural rules to impose fines and periodic penalty payments to TRs. |
|||
19/12/2016 | 2016/1672 | Technical advice to the Commission on fees for TRs under SFTR and on certain amendments of for fees under EMIR | Post Trading | Consultation Paper | PDF 709.68 KB |
Reasons for publication On 15 January 2016 the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) received a formal request from the European Commission (Commission) to provide technical advice to assist the Commission in formulating a Regulation on fees for Trade Repositories (TRs) under SFTR by a delegated act. Contents The present report contains nine sections. Section 1 refers to the Executive Summary of the report. Section 2 explains the background to our proposals. Section 3 outlines the ESMA’s expected costs. Section 4 establishes the general approach for the determination of fees under EMIR and SFTR. Section 5 explains how ESMA will manage surpluses and deficits under EMIR and SFTR. Section 6 points out the rationale and computation of TRs fees for registration and extension of registration under SFTR. Sections 7 and 8 present the supervision fees under EMIR and SFTR and recognition fees under SFTR. Section 9 refers to the conditions of payment and reimbursement and, finally, Section 10 addresses the instances where delegation to NCAs takes place. Annex I contains the summary of the questions posed by ESMA and Annex II includes the Commission’s mandate to ESMA. The amendments to fees under EMIR that are consulted in this document are required in order to ensure level –playing field with the ESMA’s fees to TRs under SFTR. Next Steps ESMA will consider the feedback it receives to this consultation in Q1 2017 and expects to publish and submit a final report of the technical advice to the European Commission for endorsement by end of Q1/beginning of Q2 of 2017. |
|||
03/09/2013 | 2013/1157 | Technical advice on third country regulatory equivalence under EMIR – US | Post Trading | Technical Advice | PDF 5.06 MB |
||||
03/09/2013 | 2013/1162 | Technical advice on third country regulatory equivalence under EMIR – Switzerland | Post Trading | Technical Advice | PDF 3.65 MB |
||||
03/09/2013 | 2013/1161 | Technical advice on third country regulatory equivalence under EMIR – Singapore | Post Trading | Technical Advice | PDF 3.55 MB |
||||
03/09/2013 | 2013/1158 | Technical advice on third country regulatory equivalence under EMIR – Japan | Post Trading | Technical Advice | PDF 3.76 MB |
||||
03/09/2013 | 2013/1160 | Technical advice on third country regulatory equivalence under EMIR – Hong Kong | Post Trading | Technical Advice | PDF 3.57 MB |
||||
03/09/2013 | 2013/1159 | Technical advice on third country regulatory equivalence under EMIR – Australia | Post Trading | Technical Advice | PDF 3.82 MB |
||||
11/11/2019 | ESMA70-151-2649 | Technical advice on comparable compliance | Post Trading | Technical Advice | PDF 790.06 KB |
||||
20/12/2013 | 2013/1974 | Revision of the provisions on diversification of collateral in ESMA’s guidelines on ETFs and other UCITS issues | Fund Management | Consultation Paper | PDF 202.22 KB |
||||
14/12/2015 | 2015/1867 | Review of Article 26 of RTS No 153/2013 with respect to MPOR for client accounts | Post Trading | Consultation Paper | PDF 227.6 KB |
||||
23/06/2015 | JC/DP/2015/01 reply form | Response form to joint Discussion Paper on PRIIPS | Fund Management, Joint Committee | Consultation Paper | DOCX 797.16 KB |
||||
14/12/2015 | 2015/1867R | Response Form to CP on review of Article 26 of RTS 153-2013 | Post Trading | Consultation Paper | DOCX 749.43 KB |
||||
05/11/2015 | 2015/1628/R | Response form to CP on indirect clearing | Post Trading | Consultation Paper | DOCX 749.61 KB |
||||
21/02/2012 | 2012/113 | Questions and Answers- A Common Definition of European Money Market Funds- updated February 2012 | Fund Management | Q&A | PDF 83.79 KB |
The purpose of this document is to promote common supervisory approaches and practices in the application of the guidelines on a Common Definition of European Money Market Funds developed by CESR by providing responses to questions posed by the general public and competent authorities. The content of this document is aimed at competent authorities to ensure that in their supervisory activities their actions are converging along the lines of the responses adopted by ESMA. However, the answers are also intended to help management companies by providing clarity as to the content of CESR’s guidelines on a Common Definition of European Money Market Funds, rather than creating an extra layer of requirements. | |||
21/11/2016 | 2016/1586 | Questions and Answers on UCITS Directive | Fund Management | Q&A | PDF 454.07 KB |
||||
02/02/2018 | ESMA70-151-1179 | Questions and Answers ESMA CCP Stress Test | Post Trading | Q&A | PDF 694.47 KB |