REFINE YOUR SEARCH
Type of document
|Date||Ref.||Title||Section||Type||Download||Info||Summary||Related Documents||Translated versions|
|17/11/2017||ESMA34-49-103||Technical advice, draft implementing technical standards and guidelines under the MMF Regulation||Fund Management||Final Report||PDF
|03/04/2018||ESMA31-62-800||Technical advice under the Prospectus Regulation||Prospectus||Final Report||PDF
|02/10/2013||2013/1374||Technical advice on third country regulatory equivalence under EMIR – Switzerland (Supplement)||Post Trading||Final Report||PDF
|02/10/2013||2013/1370||Technical advice on third country regulatory equivalence under EMIR – India||Post Trading||Final Report||PDF
|02/10/2013||2013/1375||Technical advice on third country regulatory equivalence under EMIR – Canada||Post Trading||Final Report||PDF
|05/04/2016||2016/429||Review of Article 26 of RTS No 153/2013 with respect to MPOR for client accounts||Post Trading||Final Report||PDF
Reasons for publication
In relation to the draft amended technical standards, ESMA consulted stakeholders on two occasions: the first consultation on a Discussion Paper (DP) was conducted from 27 August to 30 September 2015; the second, on the consultation paper (CP) including the proposed draft RTS was carried out from 14 December 2015 to 1st February 2016.
ESMA received a strong support from the respondents to the CP on the proposed amendment introducing the possibility for EU CCPs to margin on a one day gross basis for clients’ accounts. The responses to the consultation confirm that a one day gross account structure provides a sufficient level of protection to the CCPs and to the clients.
On the proposed conditions linked to this type of account, the majority of the respondents are of the view that they are needed to ensure the safety of the CCPs. Some clarifications or slight amendments have been introduced following the comments received, in particular on intraday margins calls and on entities belonging to the same group as clearing members.
|28/03/2011||2011/22||Report- ESMA Data on Prospectuses Approved and Passported- July 2010 to December 2010||Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure||Final Report||PDF
|03/01/2013||2012/874||Report to the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on the budgetary implications of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories (EMIR)||Post Trading||Final Report||PDF
|04/02/2020||ESMA32-67-613||Report on amendments to ESMA Guidelines on enforcement of financial information||Transparency||Final Report||PDF
|31/03/2014||2014/03/ODRG||Report of the OTC Derivatives Regulators Group (ODRG) on Cross-Border Implementation Issues||Post Trading||Final Report||PDF
|25/07/2012||2012/474||Report and consultation paper on guidelines on ETFs and other UCITS issues||Fund Management||Final Report||PDF
|This paper sets out ESMA’s guidelines on ETFs and other UCITS issues. The guidelines are adapted to the type of UCITS, management technique or financial instrument in question and are detailed in Annex III of the documentThis document also sets out in Annex IV a public consultation on the treatment of repo and reverse repo arrangements on which ESMA is seeking feedback from stakeholders. The feedback to this further consultation will be used by ESMA to finalise its position on this specific issue, which will be incorporated into the rest of the guidelines already adopted by the Authority (cf. Annex III of this document).|
|01/03/2016||2016/328||Possible systemic risk and cost implications of interoperability arrangements||Post Trading||Final Report||PDF
|30/06/2016||2016/1055||Peer Review Report on Prospectus Approval Process||Prospectus, Supervisory convergence||Final Report||PDF
|01/04/2014||2014/342||Languages accepted for the purpose of the scrutiny of the Prospectus and requirements of translation of the Summary- March 2014||Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure||Final Report||PDF
|The document provides an overview of the languages that each national competent authority accepts when acting as home or host competent authority, as the case may be, for the purpose of the scrutiny of the prospectus. In addition the document outlines national requirements in relation to translation of summaries.|
|15/03/2018||JC-2018-04||Joint Committee Final Report on Big Data||Innovation and Products||Final Report||PDF
|21/05/2015||2015/856 Ann1||Investment-based crowdfunding- Insights from regulators in the EU||Innovation and Products||Final Report||PDF
|27/09/2012||2012/600 Annex VIII||Impact assessment- Annex VIII of the Final report on draft Regulatory and Implementing Technical Standards on Regulation (EU) 648/2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories||Post Trading||Final Report||PDF
|24/08/2017||ESMA70-151-552||Guidelines on transfer of data between Trade Repositories||Guidelines and Technical standards, Post Trading||Final Report||PDF
|08/10/2019||ESMA70-151-2461||Guidelines on standardised procedures and messaging protocols under Article 6(2) of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014||Post Trading||Final Report||PDF
|04/12/2012||2012/722||Guidelines on repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements||Fund Management||Final Report||PDF
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has today published its final guidelines on repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements for UCITS funds. The guidelines state that UCITS should only enter into such agreements if they are able to recall at any time any assets or the full amount of cash.