ESMA LIBRARY
The ESMA Library contains all ESMA documents. Please use the search and filter options to find specific documents.
27
REFINE YOUR SEARCH
Sections
- (-) Remove Credit Rating Agencies filter Credit Rating Agencies
- (-) Remove Innovation and Products filter Innovation and Products
- (-) Remove Securitisation filter Securitisation
- (-) Remove Market Integrity filter Market Integrity
- (-) Remove Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors filter Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors
- Corporate Disclosure (166) Apply Corporate Disclosure filter
- CESR Archive (86) Apply CESR Archive filter
- Board of Supervisors (71) Apply Board of Supervisors filter
- IAS Regulation (71) Apply IAS Regulation filter
- Post Trading (48) Apply Post Trading filter
- Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group (47) Apply Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group filter
- Management Board (40) Apply Management Board filter
- Fund Management (25) Apply Fund Management filter
- MiFID - Secondary Markets (20) Apply MiFID - Secondary Markets filter
- Joint Committee (18) Apply Joint Committee filter
- IFRS Supervisory Convergence (17) Apply IFRS Supervisory Convergence filter
- Audit (15) Apply Audit filter
- MiFID - Investor Protection (10) Apply MiFID - Investor Protection filter
- Corporate Information (8) Apply Corporate Information filter
- Prospectus (8) Apply Prospectus filter
- Transparency (7) Apply Transparency filter
- Corporate Finance (5) Apply Corporate Finance filter
- Sustainable finance (4) Apply Sustainable finance filter
- Market Abuse (3) Apply Market Abuse filter
- Supervisory convergence (3) Apply Supervisory convergence filter
- COVID-19 (2) Apply COVID-19 filter
- European Single Electronic Format (2) Apply European Single Electronic Format filter
- Securities Financing Transactions (2) Apply Securities Financing Transactions filter
- Short Selling (2) Apply Short Selling filter
- Benchmarks (1) Apply Benchmarks filter
- CCP Directorate (1) Apply CCP Directorate filter
- Corporate Governance (1) Apply Corporate Governance filter
- Guidelines and Technical standards (1) Apply Guidelines and Technical standards filter
- International cooperation (1) Apply International cooperation filter
Type of document
- (-) Remove Technical Advice filter Technical Advice
- (-) Remove Letter filter Letter
- Reference (130) Apply Reference filter
- Press Release (94) Apply Press Release filter
- Final Report (64) Apply Final Report filter
- Report (56) Apply Report filter
- Consultation Paper (45) Apply Consultation Paper filter
- Guidelines & Recommendations (42) Apply Guidelines & Recommendations filter
- Opinion (35) Apply Opinion filter
- Statement (35) Apply Statement filter
- Speech (26) Apply Speech filter
- Decision (23) Apply Decision filter
- Annual Report (9) Apply Annual Report filter
- Technical Standards (5) Apply Technical Standards filter
- Q&A (4) Apply Q&A filter
- Compliance table (2) Apply Compliance table filter
Your filters
Summary of Conclusions X Letter X Technical Advice X Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors X Innovation and Products X Credit Rating Agencies X Market Integrity X Securitisation X
Reset all filtersDate | Ref. | Title | Section | Type | Download | Info | Summary | Related Documents | Translated versions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
09/02/2021 | ESAs 2021 07 | ESAs letter on DORA | Innovation and Products, Joint Committee | Letter | PDF 142.91 KB |
||||
29/06/2020 | ESMA50-164-3475 | Coverletter- ESMA response to EC consultation on a new Digital Finance Strategy for Europe | Innovation and Products | Letter | PDF 87.97 KB |
||||
20/08/2019 | ESMA50-164-2554 | Letter to EC- Joint EBA ESMA response on crypto-assets | Innovation and Products | Letter | PDF 93.63 KB |
||||
18/07/2019 | ESMA33-9-321 | Technical Advice on Sustainability Considerations in the Credit Rating Market | Credit Rating Agencies | Technical Advice | PDF 451.01 KB |
||||
14/05/2019 | FISMA.C.3/IK/TL/Ares(2019)2120576 | EC Art 38 MAR mandate | Market Abuse, Market Integrity | Letter | PDF 187.62 KB |
||||
10/04/2019 | JC 2019 26 | Joint ESA advice on the need for legislative improvements relating to ICT risk management requirements | Innovation and Products, Joint Committee | Technical Advice | PDF 1.34 MB |
||||
10/04/2019 | JC 2019 25 | Joint ESA advice on the costs and benefits of developing a coherent cyber resilience testing framework for significant market participants and infrastructures | Innovation and Products, Joint Committee | Technical Advice | PDF 785.49 KB |
||||
10/04/2019 | ESMA 50-164-2193 | Letter to EC- FinTech action plan- ICT cybersecurity and outsourcing | Innovation and Products | Letter | PDF 58.38 KB |
||||
08/01/2019 | ESMA33-128-619 | Letter to EC on regulatory cooperation under the Securitisation Regulation | Securitisation | Letter | PDF 118.61 KB |
||||
18/12/2018 | fisma.01/РР/ rv/ (2018) 6771757 | European Commission letter to ESMA on draft RTS and ITS securitisation disclosures | Securitisation | Letter | PDF 139.27 KB |
On Friday 14 December 2018, the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) received a letter from the European Commission regarding the draft regulatory and implementing technical standards on securitisation disclosures submitted by ESMA on 22 August 2018.
The letter states that the Commission intends to endorse those draft regulatory and implementing technical standards only once certain amendments are introduced.
|
|||
13/11/2018 | ESMA33-128-505 | Final Technical Advice Securitisation Repositories Fees | Securitisation | Technical Advice | PDF 570.74 KB |
||||
24/04/2018 | ESMA33-128-485 | Letter to OG- Delivery of ESMA’s technical standards on disclosure under the Securitisation Regulation | Securitisation | Letter | PDF 250.7 KB |
||||
30/01/2017 | ESMA70-708036281-19 | Letter to European Commission- EMIR Review and Sanctioning Powers | Credit Rating Agencies, Post Trading | Letter | PDF 265.24 KB |
||||
26/07/2016 | 2016/1164 | Letter to the Commissioner Dombrovskis on MAR ITS | Market Abuse, Market Integrity | Letter | PDF 205.33 KB |
||||
02/10/2015 | 2015/1472 | Technical Advice on Competition, Choice and Conflicts of Interest in the CRA industry | Credit Rating Agencies | Technical Advice | PDF 2.48 MB |
||||
02/10/2015 | 2015/1471 | Technical Advice on Reducing Sole and Mechanistic Reliance on Credit Ratings | Credit Rating Agencies | Technical Advice | PDF 1.1 MB |
||||
17/09/2014 | 2014/850rev | Technical Advice in accordance with Article 39(b) 2 of the CRA Regulation | Credit Rating Agencies | Technical Advice | PDF 370.42 KB |
This document has been revised to reflect an amended figure in Table 1 and two re-classifications of solicitation status in Table 2. Article 39b(2) of the CRA Regulation states that the European Commission shall adopt a report by end 2014 – after receiving ESMA’s technical advice – on the appropriateness of the development of a European creditworthiness assessment for sovereign debt. In its request for advice, the Commission asked ESMA to provide input on the issue of sovereign ratings and rating processes including an overview of the market for sovereign ratings, information on operational issues regarding sovereign ratings, information on sovereign rating processes as well as lessons drawn from ESMA’s supervisory experience. Contents For the purposes of this advice, ESMA provides its views based on the quantitative information contained in the CEREP public database and on information publicly disclosed by credit rating agencies registered with ESMA. Additionally, ESMA’s advice has been informed by its first supervisory activities regarding the rating process for sovereign ratings of CRAs which are active in the EU sovereign rating market. In accordance with the CRA Regulation, these supervisory activities did not address the content of the sovereign methodologies themselves but rather were concerned with the independence, transparency and governance of the sovereign rating process. Sovereign credit ratings play a crucial role from a credit market and financial stability perspective, not least because sovereign governments account for the largest group of borrowers in capital markets in terms of volume. In addition the crucial importance of these sovereign ratings can be amplified by the “cascade” effect sovereign ratings have on other asset classes via their presence as factors in other asset methodologies. In the EU the sovereign rating market is composed of nine CRAs established in nine different EU member states. These nine CRAs exhibit a high level of variation with respect to the type and number of sovereign ratings they assign. Sovereign credit ratings themselves can also be differentiated in various ways depending on such factors as local/foreign currency, duration of issuance, whether the rating applies to a specific issuer or issuance and if it is solicited or unsolicited. In addition ESMA would like to emphasise the following points which it believes to be important when considering the appropriateness of the development of a European creditworthiness assessment of sovereign debt. | |||
24/06/2014 | 2014/686 | Letter to Commissioner Barnier re draft Regulatory Technical Standards under the CRA3 Regulation | Credit Rating Agencies | Letter | PDF 25.37 KB |
||||
19/12/2013 | 2013/1953 | Technical Advice to the European Commission on the equivalence between the Argentinean regulatory and supervisory framework and the EU regulatory regime for CRAs | Credit Rating Agencies | Technical Advice | PDF 143.15 KB |
||||
21/11/2013 | 2013/1703 | Technical Advice on the feasibility of a network of small and medium-sized CRAs | Credit Rating Agencies | Technical Advice | PDF 601.05 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has finalised its Technical Advice to the European Commission on the feasibility of a network of small and medium sized credit rating agencies in order to increase competition in the market. The technical advice provides quantitative and qualitative information on small and medium-sized CRAs in the EU, based on the analysis of the periodic reporting obligations of CRAs to ESMA via the central repository CEREP. It also covers some information regarding possible barriers to entry for companies that wish to conduct rating activity in the EU. Contents The main findings of the advice are: • The 22 registered CRAs are established in 11 EU Member States; • None of the small and medium-sized CRAs cover the whole range of the five rating classes considered (corporates (non-financial), financials, insurance, sovereign and public finance, and structured finance). Whilst DBRS and BCRA cover four and three classes respectively, all the remaining small and medium-sized CRAs cover one or two rating classes only. This contrasts with Fitch, Moody’s and S&P that issue ratings for all five possible rating classes; • Small and medium-sized CRAs are mainly active in issuing corporate ratings. Within this rating type, four small and medium-sized CRAs issue a relatively high number of corporate ratings (CERVED and ICAP) or financial and insurance ratings (GBB and AM Best); • Only 6 of the small and medium-sized CRAs provide sovereign ratings (BCRA, Capital Intelligence, DBRS, European Rating, Feri Euro Rating (Feri) and Japan Credit Rating Agency (JCR)), whilst only one (DBRS) issues structured finance ratings; • As of end 2012 the majority of small and medium-sized CRAs issued solicited ratings only, whilst eight issued unsolicited ratings only. Three small and medium-sized CRAs (DBRS, JCR, and Scope) issued both solicited and unsolicited ratings, as was the case also for Fitch, Moody’s and S&P; • As regards geographical coverage of the small and medium-sized CRAs 6 out of 19 (AM Best, Capital Intelligence, Creditreform, DBRS, JCR and Scope) have a coverage that goes beyond one Member State when referring to corporate ratings. As regards the sovereign ratings type, three of the small and medium-sized CRAs cover more than one Member State (Capital Intelligence, Feri and JCR). In both of these ratings types, Fitch, Moody’s and S&P’s rating activities cover all Member States of the EU; • In 2013, 96% of the supervisory fees were paid by S&P, Moody’s, and Fitch, while their turnover from rating and ancillary services was equal to 88% of the total turnover of the 20 registered and certified CRAs in 2012: and • As of July 2013, 14 out of 19 small and medium-sized CRAs have been granted at least one of the regulatory exemptions provided for in the CRA Regulation. Finally, and with reference to the current situation in the segment of small and medium-sized CRAs, ESMA is not aware of any private networks of small and medium-sized CRAs currently in place. |