ESMA LIBRARY
REFINE YOUR SEARCH
Sections
- (-) Remove Post Trading filter Post Trading
- (-) Remove Corporate Disclosure filter Corporate Disclosure
- (-) Remove Trade Repositories filter Trade Repositories
- (-) Remove Market Abuse filter Market Abuse
- (-) Remove Innovation and Products filter Innovation and Products
- (-) Remove Benchmarks filter Benchmarks
- CESR Archive (127) Apply CESR Archive filter
- Corporate Information (84) Apply Corporate Information filter
- Credit Rating Agencies (39) Apply Credit Rating Agencies filter
- Board of Supervisors (22) Apply Board of Supervisors filter
- Board of Appeal (19) Apply Board of Appeal filter
- Management Board (16) Apply Management Board filter
- Joint Committee (12) Apply Joint Committee filter
- MiFID - Investor Protection (9) Apply MiFID - Investor Protection filter
- MiFID - Secondary Markets (9) Apply MiFID - Secondary Markets filter
- Planning reporting budget (9) Apply Planning reporting budget filter
- Short Selling (9) Apply Short Selling filter
- Market Integrity (8) Apply Market Integrity filter
- Fund Management (6) Apply Fund Management filter
- COVID-19 (5) Apply COVID-19 filter
- Prospectus (5) Apply Prospectus filter
- Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group (3) Apply Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group filter
- Careers (2) Apply Careers filter
- Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors (2) Apply Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors filter
- Securitisation (2) Apply Securitisation filter
- Supervisory convergence (2) Apply Supervisory convergence filter
- Transparency (2) Apply Transparency filter
- Corporate Finance (1) Apply Corporate Finance filter
- Press Releases (1) Apply Press Releases filter
- Procurement (1) Apply Procurement filter
- Securities Financing Transactions (1) Apply Securities Financing Transactions filter
- Trading (1) Apply Trading filter
Type of document
- (-) Remove Technical Advice filter Technical Advice
- (-) Remove Annual Report filter Annual Report
- (-) Remove CESR Document filter CESR Document
- (-) Remove Decision filter Decision
- Letter (222) Apply Letter filter
- Reference (217) Apply Reference filter
- Final Report (103) Apply Final Report filter
- Consultation Paper (99) Apply Consultation Paper filter
- Press Release (96) Apply Press Release filter
- Statement (83) Apply Statement filter
- Report (69) Apply Report filter
- Speech (45) Apply Speech filter
- Opinion (33) Apply Opinion filter
- Guidelines & Recommendations (29) Apply Guidelines & Recommendations filter
- Compliance table (16) Apply Compliance table filter
- Q&A (15) Apply Q&A filter
- Technical Standards (12) Apply Technical Standards filter
- Investor Warning (1) Apply Investor Warning filter
Date | Ref. | Title | Section | Type | Download | Info | Summary | Related Documents | Translated versions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
15/11/2018 | ESMA70-145-1081 | Annual report on administrative and criminal sanctions and other administrative measures under MAR | Market Abuse, Market Integrity | Annual Report | PDF 158.47 KB |
||||
23/11/2021 | ESMA70-156-4673 | Annual Report on MAR administrative and criminal sanctions 2021 | Market Abuse | Annual Report | PDF 338.34 KB |
||||
29/06/2012 | 2012/415 | Call for Evidence on Empty Voting | Transparency, Corporate Disclosure | CESR Document | PDF 275.66 KB |
ESMA launched a Call for Evidence on Empty Voting in September 2011 to analyse the potential issues and concerns raised by the practice of empty voting and to examine whether there was a possible need for further action. An analysis of the responses received to the consultation has led ESMA to conclude that there is insufficient evidence to justify any regulatory action at the European level at present. | |||
24/03/2022 | ESMA41-356-271 | Decision of the Board of Supervisors to adopt supervisory measures and impose fines in respect of infringements committed by REGIS-TR, S.A | Board of Supervisors, Trade Repositories | Decision | PDF 1.17 MB |
||||
31/03/2016 | 2016/408 | Decision to adopt a supervisory measure taking the form of a public notice and to impose a fine in accordance with Statement of Findings in accordance with Articles 64(5), 65, 67 and 73 of Regulation (EC) No 648/2012 EMIR | Trade Repositories | Decision | PDF 62.47 KB |
Decision to adopt a supervisory measure taking the form of a public notice and to impose a fine in accordance with Statement of Findings in accordance with Articles 64(5), 65, 67 and 73 of Regulation (EC) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories Public notice regarding negligent breach by DTCC Derivatives Repository Ltd of its legal obligation to ensure immediate access for regulators to data reported under EMIR DTCC Derivatives Repository Ltd (‘DDRL’) is a trade repository registered in the European Union and is part of the DTCC group which includes a number of companies providing post-trading services to the global financial services industry. DDRL was registered by ESMA as a trade repository under Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories (‘EMIR’) on 7 November 2013. ESMA has responsibilities for the supervision and enforcement of provisions under EMIR concerning DDRL and other trade repositories registered in the EU. In May 2014, ESMA’s supervisory team became aware of delays in providing regulators with access to data reported to DDRL under EMIR. Following further examination, the supervisory team formed the view that there were serious indications of the possible existence of facts liable to constitute one or more of the infringements listed in EMIR. The matter was accordingly referred to an independent investigation officer (the ‘IIO’). The IIO considered the evidence referred to him and conducted further investigations, before submitting his findings to ESMA’s Board of Supervisors (the ‘ESMA Board’). Based on the findings of the IIO and the evidence put before it, the ESMA Board found on 23 March 2016 that an examination of the facts showed that DDRL had committed the following infringement under EMIR and had done so negligently. DDRL committed an infringement of EMIR by not allowing regulators and supervisors direct and immediate access to the details of derivatives contracts they need to fulfil their responsibilities and mandates. |
|||
12/07/2021 | ESMA41-356-187 | Decision- DTCC Derivatives Repository | Board of Supervisors, Trade Repositories | Decision | PDF 1.13 MB |
||||
23/09/2021 | ESMA41-356-233 | Decision- UnaVista Limited | Trade Repositories | Decision | PDF 996.23 KB |
||||
16/02/2015 | 2015/280 | ESMA supervision of Credit Rating Agencies and Trade Repositories | Corporate Information, Credit Rating Agencies, Post Trading | Annual Report | PDF 891.95 KB |
This document reports on the direct supervisory activities carried out by ESMA during 2014 regarding credit rating agencies (CRAs) and trade repositories (TRs) within the European Union (EU). It sets out ESMAs key areas of action during 2014 and outlines ESMA’s main priorities for 2015. | |||
09/03/2020 | ESMA80-199-332 | ESMA Supervision- Annual Report 2019 and Work Programme 2020 | Benchmarks, Credit Rating Agencies, Securities Financing Transactions, Securitisation, Trade Repositories | Annual Report | PDF 825.72 KB |
||||
02/10/2013 | 2013/1369 | ESMA Technical advice on equivalence of Hong Kong for OTC and TR (Supplement) | Post Trading | Technical Advice | PDF 124.15 KB |
||||
30/01/2014 | 2014/123 | ESMA Technical advice on equivalence of Japan for CCP II- Commodities CCPs | Post Trading | Technical Advice | PDF 3.33 MB |
ESMA delivers second set of advice on EMIR equivalence Following its technical advice published on 9 September 2013, the European Securities and Market Authority (ESMA) has published a supplement to its advice to the European Commission on the equivalence of the regulatory regime for central counterparties (CCPs) of Japan with the European Markets Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR). This supplement to the September 2013 Final report sets out ESMA’s advice to the European Commission is in respect of the equivalence between the Japanese regulatory regime for commodity CCPs and the regulatory regime for CCPs under EMIR. ESMA proposes conditional equivalence As for ESMA’s advice to the Commission in respect of Japan for CCPs which clear transactions relating to securities, currencies, interest rates, credit, weather, GDP and other indices, ESMA considers that the Japanese regulatory regime for commodity CCPs contains legal provisions and involves supervision and enforcement similar to that of EMIR. The Commission is expected to use ESMA’s technical advice to prepare possible equivalence decisions. Where it adopts such a decision, certain provisions of EMIR may be disapplied in favour of equivalent third-country rules. In particular, ESMA may recognise within the EU a CCP which is authorised outside the EU. The different pieces of advice are available on ESMA’s website. |
|||
02/10/2013 | 2013/1372 | ESMA Technical advice on equivalence of Singapore for TRs (Supplement) | Post Trading | Technical Advice | PDF 500.37 KB |
||||
02/10/2013 | 2013/1371 | ESMA Technical advice on equivalence of South Korea for CCPs | Post Trading | Technical Advice | PDF 1.83 MB |
||||
03/02/2015 | 2015/224 | ESMA’s technical advice on possible delegated acts concerning the Market Abuse Regulation | Market Abuse | Technical Advice | PDF 1021.03 KB |
This advice:• specifies the MAR market manipulation indicators, by providing examples of practices that may constitute market manipulation as well as proposing “additional” indicators of market manipulation; • recommends to set the minimum thresholds that exempt certain market participants in the emission allowance market from publicly disclosing inside information at six million tonnes of CO2eq per year and at 2,430 MW rated thermal input;• suggests the way to determine to which regulator delays in disclosure of inside information needs to be notified. • provides clarifications on the enhanced disclosure of managers’ transactions. - ESMA recommends disclosing any acquisition, disposal, subscription or exchange of financial instruments of the relevant issuer or related financial instruments carried out by managers,, further illustrated through a non-exhaustive list of types of transactions subject to this obligation. . ESMA also clarifies the transactions that can be allowed by the issuer during a closed period when normally managers are prohibited to trade; and• proposes procedures and arrangements to ensure sound whistleblowing infrastructures – i.e. EU national regulators should allow the receipt of reports of infringements, including appropriate communication channels and guarantee the protection of reporting and reported persons, with respect to their identity and their personal data. Next steps ESMA has sent its technical advice to the European Commission for its consideration in drafting its implementing standards regarding MAR. ESMA’s regulatory technical standards regarding MAR will be delivered in July 2015. | |||
01/03/2012 | 2012/137 | ESMA’s technical advice on possible delegated acts concerning the Prospectus Directive as amended by the Directive 2010/73/EU | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Technical Advice | PDF 1.32 MB |
ESMA publishes today the second part of its final advice (ESMA/2012/137) on possible delegated acts for the Prospectus Directive (PD). The advice was submitted to the Commission on 29 February 2012. In its advice, ESMA proposes how to use a prospectus in a retail cascade and provides input on how to review the provisions of the Prospectus Regulation concerning tax information, indices, auditor’s report on profit forecasts and estimates and audited historical financial information. Today’s advice follows a public consultation started on 13 December 2011. Overall, the technical advice aims to achieve a high level of investor protection and to increase across Europe the legal clarity and efficiency of the prospectus regime. Investment prospectuses as such are aimed to provide investors with easily accessible information on financial products so as to foster in-formed decision-making. | |||
09/01/2013 | 2012/864 | ESMA’s technical advice on possible delegated acts concerning the Prospectus Directive as amended by the Directive 2010/73/EU | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Technical Advice | PDF 1.23 MB |
||||
04/04/2013 | 2013/302 | ESMA’s Technical Advice to the Commission on Fees for Trade Repositories | Post Trading | Technical Advice | PDF 1.08 MB |
On 14 January 2013 ESMA received a formal request from the European Commission (the Commission) to provide technical advice to assist the Commission in formulating a Regulation on fees for Trade Repositories (TRs) by a delegated act. In order to deliver its advice to the Commission, ESMA consulted market participants regarding the proposed fee structures for registration, supervision and recognition of TRs. Respondents to this consultation were encouraged to provide the relevant data to support their arguments or proposals.Given the time period established for providing this advice, ESMA was compelled to require responses to the consultation within a short timeframe. In total, ESMA received 8 responses to the consultation. Non-confidential responses can be found on ESMA’s website. ESMA would like to thank respondents for providing input given the short period ESMA was able to consult for. This document sets out a summary of the responses received by ESMA regarding the fee structure for registration, supervision and recognition of TRs in the EU and includes ESMA’s final technical advice to the Commission on the future Regulation on fees for TRs which will be adopted by the Commission in the form of a delegated act. It is worth noting that all major ESMA proposals were supported by respondents and where comments were received ESMA has considered how best to adjust the original proposals. Next steps ESMA will follow-up on this work with the Commission as they work on the adoption of the Commission delegated regulation on fees for TRs. |
|||
20/03/2013 | 2013/318 | Feedback Statement on proposed amendments to the ESMA update of the CESR recommendations for the consistent implementation of the Prospectuses Regulation regarding mineral companies | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure, Transparency | CESR Document | PDF 265.19 KB |
||||
23/03/2011 | 2011/67 | Feedback statement- Consultation Paper on proposed amendments to CESR | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | CESR Document | PDF 384.63 KB |
||||
15/05/2009 | 09-220 | Feedback statement- MAD Level 3 – Third set of CESR guidance and information on the common operation of the Directive to the market | Market Abuse | CESR Document | PDF 238.16 KB |