ESMA LIBRARY
The ESMA Library contains all ESMA documents. Please use the search and filter options to find specific documents.
96
REFINE YOUR SEARCH
Sections
- (-) Remove Corporate Disclosure filter Corporate Disclosure
- (-) Remove Supervisory convergence filter Supervisory convergence
- (-) Remove Market Abuse filter Market Abuse
- (-) Remove Prospectus filter Prospectus
- (-) Remove Benchmarks filter Benchmarks
- (-) Remove Securities Financing Transactions filter Securities Financing Transactions
- (-) Remove Corporate Finance filter Corporate Finance
- (-) Remove Brexit filter Brexit
- CESR Archive (412) Apply CESR Archive filter
- Corporate Information (80) Apply Corporate Information filter
- Post Trading (56) Apply Post Trading filter
- Joint Committee (41) Apply Joint Committee filter
- Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors (34) Apply Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors filter
- MiFID - Secondary Markets (29) Apply MiFID - Secondary Markets filter
- Credit Rating Agencies (27) Apply Credit Rating Agencies filter
- Fund Management (26) Apply Fund Management filter
- MiFID - Investor Protection (26) Apply MiFID - Investor Protection filter
- CCP Directorate (18) Apply CCP Directorate filter
- IFRS Supervisory Convergence (14) Apply IFRS Supervisory Convergence filter
- Guidelines and Technical standards (12) Apply Guidelines and Technical standards filter
- Market data (10) Apply Market data filter
- Market Integrity (9) Apply Market Integrity filter
- Planning reporting budget (8) Apply Planning reporting budget filter
- Sustainable finance (8) Apply Sustainable finance filter
- Securitisation (7) Apply Securitisation filter
- Trade Repositories (7) Apply Trade Repositories filter
- Board of Supervisors (6) Apply Board of Supervisors filter
- Short Selling (6) Apply Short Selling filter
- Trading (6) Apply Trading filter
- Innovation and Products (5) Apply Innovation and Products filter
- European Single Electronic Format (4) Apply European Single Electronic Format filter
- Transparency (4) Apply Transparency filter
- Management Board (3) Apply Management Board filter
- Corporate Governance (2) Apply Corporate Governance filter
- COVID-19 (2) Apply COVID-19 filter
- Crowdfunding (2) Apply Crowdfunding filter
- Press Releases (2) Apply Press Releases filter
- Audit (1) Apply Audit filter
- IAS Regulation (1) Apply IAS Regulation filter
Type of document
- (-) Remove Final Report filter Final Report
- (-) Remove Q&A filter Q&A
- (-) Remove Annual Report filter Annual Report
- (-) Remove CESR Document filter CESR Document
- Letter (190) Apply Letter filter
- Reference (121) Apply Reference filter
- Press Release (89) Apply Press Release filter
- Statement (78) Apply Statement filter
- Consultation Paper (52) Apply Consultation Paper filter
- Report (48) Apply Report filter
- Speech (28) Apply Speech filter
- Guidelines & Recommendations (18) Apply Guidelines & Recommendations filter
- Opinion (18) Apply Opinion filter
- Compliance table (9) Apply Compliance table filter
- Technical Advice (5) Apply Technical Advice filter
- Technical Standards (4) Apply Technical Standards filter
- Decision (1) Apply Decision filter
Your filters
MiFID II: Transparency Calculations and DVC X Market Abuse X Corporate Disclosure X Prospectus X Supervisory convergence X Securities Financing Transactions X Corporate Finance X Brexit X Benchmarks X Annual Report X Q&A X CESR Document X Final Report X
Reset all filtersDate | Ref. | Title | Section | Type | Download | Info | Summary | Related Documents | Translated versions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
11/05/2005 | 05-274 | Feedback Statement- Market Abuse Directive, Level 3 – first set of guidance and information on the common operation of the Directive | Market Abuse | Final Report | PDF 79.76 KB |
http://www.cesr-eu.org/data/document/05_274.pdf | |||
22/11/2007 | 07-693 | Report on Administrative Measures and Sanctions available in Member States under the Market Abuse Directive (MAD) | Market Abuse | Final Report | PDF 3.44 MB |
||||
28/02/2008 | 08-099 | CESR Executive summary to the report on administrative measures and sanctions as well as the criminal sanctions available in Member States under the Market Abuse Directive | Market Abuse | Final Report | PDF 874.1 KB |
||||
15/05/2009 | 09-220 | Feedback statement- MAD Level 3 – Third set of CESR guidance and information on the common operation of the Directive to the market | Market Abuse | CESR Document | PDF 238.16 KB |
||||
07/07/2011 | 2011/194 | Report- Mapping of the Transparency Directive | Supervisory convergence | Final Report | PDF 1.15 MB |
Report - Mapping of the Transparency Directive | |||
28/03/2011 | 2011/22 | Report- ESMA Data on Prospectuses Approved and Passported- July 2010 to December 2010 | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Final Report | PDF 134.79 KB |
||||
18/01/2011 | 2011/26 | Summary Report on the mapping of contingency measures | Supervisory convergence | Final Report | PDF 93.63 KB |
||||
23/03/2011 | 2011/67 | Feedback statement- Consultation Paper on proposed amendments to CESR | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | CESR Document | PDF 384.63 KB |
||||
26/04/2012 | 2012/270 | Actual use of sanctioning powers under MAD | Supervisory convergence | Final Report | PDF 1.55 MB |
The report provides a comparison of the use of administrative sanctioning powers across 29 EEA Member States for 2008-2010. The results of the report will provide input to the legislative process on the new market abuse regime. | |||
24/05/2012 | 2012/300 | Prospectus Directive – Good Practices in the approval process | Supervisory convergence | Final Report | PDF 467.38 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has published today “Prospectus Directive – Good Practices in the approval process“, a peer review report on the application of regulatory good practices by national supervisory authorities - competent authorities (CA) when approving investment prospectuses.The review was conducted using good practice criteria that ESMA developed on selected areas of the Prospectus Directive dealing with the approval process for investment prospectuses. The prospectuses provide investors with easy to understand and relevant information on investment products. Peer review reports on national regulators’ procedures contribute to ESMA’s objective of fostering supervisory convergence and achieving a level playing field between jurisdictions. | |||
29/06/2012 | 2012/415 | Call for Evidence on Empty Voting | Transparency, Corporate Disclosure | CESR Document | PDF 275.66 KB |
ESMA launched a Call for Evidence on Empty Voting in September 2011 to analyse the potential issues and concerns raised by the practice of empty voting and to examine whether there was a possible need for further action. An analysis of the responses received to the consultation has led ESMA to conclude that there is insufficient evidence to justify any regulatory action at the European level at present. | |||
26/07/2012 | 2012/482 | Review of Greek Government Bonds accounting practices | Corporate Disclosure, IFRS Supervisory Convergence | Final Report | PDF 583.61 KB |
This report includes a Review of Greek Government Bonds accounting practices in the IFRS Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2011. |
|||
16/08/2012 | 2012/525 | Summary of responses on considerations of materiality in financial reporting | Corporate Disclosure, IFRS Supervisory Convergence | Final Report | PDF 383.4 KB |
||||
25/09/2012 | 2012/602 | ESMA Data on Prospectuses Approved and Passported- January 2011 to December 2011 | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Final Report | PDF 573.49 KB |
||||
25/09/2012 | 2012/603 | ESMA Data on Prospectuses Approved and Passported- January 2012 to June 2012 | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Final Report | PDF 431.12 KB |
NOTE: This Report is an amended version of the Report published on 25 September 2012. The previously published Report was amended on 15 May 2013 following the discovery of factual errors in the statis-tical information in Section III.2. Title ESMA Data on Prospectuses Approved and Passported - January 2012 to June 2012 | |||
18/11/2013 | 2013/1664 | Review of Accounting Practices- Comparability of IFRS Financial Statements of Financial Institutions in Europe | Corporate Disclosure | Final Report | PDF 1.3 MB |
This report provides an overview of accounting practices of financial institutions in Europe in selected areas related to financial instruments. It evaluates the level of comparability and quality of the disclosures in the 2012 IFRS financial statements of a sample of 39 major European financial institutions and includes recommendations to enhance the transparency of financial information through the application of the IFRS provisions. Transparent financial information plays a key role in maintaining market confidence, improving markets’ efficiency by allowing investors to identify risks in a timely manner, contributing to financial stability and is a pre-requisite in creating premises for sound economic growth. As an effect of market turbulences resulting from the financial crisis, transparency and comparability of the financial statements of financial institutions have gained increased importance for market participants. In this context, ESMA has intensified its reviewing activities, with an increased focus on the financial statements of financial institutions and together with EBA and ESRB has undertaken further initiatives to improve the level of confidence in the financial sector by asking financial institutions to provide better disclosure of financial and risk information in financial reporting. Overall ESMA found that disclosures specifically covered by requirements of IFRS 7 – Financial Instru-ments: Disclosures were generally provided and acknowledges the efforts made by financial institutions to improve the quality of their financial statements. Yet, ESMA observed a wide variability in the quality of the information provided and identified some cases where the information provided was not sufficient or not sufficiently structured to allow comparability among financial institutions. Some financial institutions provided disclosures that were not specific enough, lacked links between quantitative and narrative information, or provided disclosures that could not be reconciled to the primary financial statements. ESMA urges issuers to take a step back and consider the overall objectives of IFRS 7 against their specific circumstances when preparing disclosures. When information was provided outside financial statements (e.g. in a risk report or business review), in some cases it was unclear whether it was incorporated by reference. In general, users of financial infor-mation would benefit if information provided in different sections of the financial report were linked to each other and if information provided across these reports was consistent or major differences in bases used to provide this information were explained. | |||
18/12/2013 | 2013/1943 | ESMA Data on Prospectuses Approved and Passported—January 2013 to June 2013 | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Final Report | PDF 338.17 KB |
||||
14/02/2013 | 2013/218 | Considerations of materiality in financial reporting | Corporate Disclosure, IFRS Supervisory Convergence | Final Report | PDF 446.95 KB |
||||
20/03/2013 | 2013/318 | Feedback Statement on proposed amendments to the ESMA update of the CESR recommendations for the consistent implementation of the Prospectuses Regulation regarding mineral companies | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure, Transparency | CESR Document | PDF 265.19 KB |
||||
10/06/2013 | 2013/619 | Comparison of liability regimes in Member States in relation to the Prospectus Directive | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Final Report | PDF 596.91 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has published a report on the Comparison of liability regimes in Member States in relation to the Prospectus Directive. This is the first report of its kind and provides a comparison of liability regimes covering the EEA – comprising the 27 EU Member States along with Iceland and Norway and is aimed at providing clarity for market participants about the different regimes in place. The report contains an overview of the different arrangements and frameworks in place in EEA States to address administrative, criminal, civil and governmental liability, and provides clarity to market participants about the different regimes in place. The report was compiled in response to a European Commission request of January 2011 for assistance in identifying and monitoring the different regimes in EEA states. The report does not cover how the regimes, or sanctions, are applied. Report Comparison of liability regimes in Member States in relation to the Prospectus Directive Annex II Comparative table of responses from EEA States Annex III Individual responses from EEA States |