ESMA LIBRARY
REFINE YOUR SEARCH
Sections
- (-) Remove Post Trading filter Post Trading
- (-) Remove Fund Management filter Fund Management
- (-) Remove Corporate Disclosure filter Corporate Disclosure
- (-) Remove Benchmarks filter Benchmarks
- MiFID - Secondary Markets (88) Apply MiFID - Secondary Markets filter
- MiFID - Investor Protection (64) Apply MiFID - Investor Protection filter
- Short Selling (35) Apply Short Selling filter
- Market Integrity (34) Apply Market Integrity filter
- COVID-19 (12) Apply COVID-19 filter
- Credit Rating Agencies (12) Apply Credit Rating Agencies filter
- Market Abuse (8) Apply Market Abuse filter
- Prospectus (6) Apply Prospectus filter
- Innovation and Products (5) Apply Innovation and Products filter
- Joint Committee (5) Apply Joint Committee filter
- Supervisory convergence (5) Apply Supervisory convergence filter
- Brexit (4) Apply Brexit filter
- Securitisation (4) Apply Securitisation filter
- Corporate Information (2) Apply Corporate Information filter
- Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group (2) Apply Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group filter
- Trading (2) Apply Trading filter
- Board of Supervisors (1) Apply Board of Supervisors filter
- CESR Archive (1) Apply CESR Archive filter
- IFRS Supervisory Convergence (1) Apply IFRS Supervisory Convergence filter
- Warnings and publications for investors (1) Apply Warnings and publications for investors filter
Type of document
- (-) Remove Opinion filter Opinion
- (-) Remove Technical Advice filter Technical Advice
- Letter (235) Apply Letter filter
- Reference (210) Apply Reference filter
- Guidelines & Recommendations (128) Apply Guidelines & Recommendations filter
- Consultation Paper (116) Apply Consultation Paper filter
- Press Release (112) Apply Press Release filter
- Final Report (102) Apply Final Report filter
- Statement (88) Apply Statement filter
- Report (66) Apply Report filter
- Speech (42) Apply Speech filter
- Compliance table (24) Apply Compliance table filter
- Q&A (18) Apply Q&A filter
- Technical Standards (15) Apply Technical Standards filter
- CESR Document (3) Apply CESR Document filter
- Annual Report (2) Apply Annual Report filter
- SMSG Advice (1) Apply SMSG Advice filter
Date | Ref. | Title | Section | Type | Download | Info | Summary | Related Documents | Translated versions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
04/10/2011 | 2011/323 | Final report- ESMA's technical advice on possible delegated acts concerning the Prospectus Directive as amended by the Directive 2010/73/EU | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Technical Advice | PDF 797.56 KB |
||||
13/10/2011 | 2011/342 | Opinion- Practical arrangements for the late transposition of the UCITS IV Directive | Fund Management | Opinion | PDF 41.33 KB |
||||
16/11/2011 | 2011/379 | Final report- ESMA's technical advice to the European Commission on possible implementing measures of the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive | Fund Management | Technical Advice | PDF 3.51 MB |
||||
01/03/2012 | 2012/137 | ESMA’s technical advice on possible delegated acts concerning the Prospectus Directive as amended by the Directive 2010/73/EU | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Technical Advice | PDF 1.32 MB |
ESMA publishes today the second part of its final advice (ESMA/2012/137) on possible delegated acts for the Prospectus Directive (PD). The advice was submitted to the Commission on 29 February 2012. In its advice, ESMA proposes how to use a prospectus in a retail cascade and provides input on how to review the provisions of the Prospectus Regulation concerning tax information, indices, auditor’s report on profit forecasts and estimates and audited historical financial information. Today’s advice follows a public consultation started on 13 December 2011. Overall, the technical advice aims to achieve a high level of investor protection and to increase across Europe the legal clarity and efficiency of the prospectus regime. Investment prospectuses as such are aimed to provide investors with easily accessible information on financial products so as to foster in-formed decision-making. | |||
20/11/2012 | 2012/721 | Opinion on Article 50(2)(a) of the UCITS Directive | Fund Management | Opinion | PDF 81.31 KB |
||||
09/01/2013 | 2012/864 | ESMA’s technical advice on possible delegated acts concerning the Prospectus Directive as amended by the Directive 2010/73/EU | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Technical Advice | PDF 1.23 MB |
||||
15/03/2013 | 2013/312 | Regulatory technical standards on colleges for central counterparties supplementing Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 | Post Trading | Opinion | PDF 151.67 KB |
||||
20/03/2013 | 2013/317 | Framework for the assessment of third country prospectuses under Article 20 of the Prospectus Directive | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Opinion | PDF 725.59 KB |
||||
04/04/2013 | 2013/302 | ESMA’s Technical Advice to the Commission on Fees for Trade Repositories | Post Trading | Technical Advice | PDF 1.08 MB |
On 14 January 2013 ESMA received a formal request from the European Commission (the Commission) to provide technical advice to assist the Commission in formulating a Regulation on fees for Trade Repositories (TRs) by a delegated act. In order to deliver its advice to the Commission, ESMA consulted market participants regarding the proposed fee structures for registration, supervision and recognition of TRs. Respondents to this consultation were encouraged to provide the relevant data to support their arguments or proposals.Given the time period established for providing this advice, ESMA was compelled to require responses to the consultation within a short timeframe. In total, ESMA received 8 responses to the consultation. Non-confidential responses can be found on ESMA’s website. ESMA would like to thank respondents for providing input given the short period ESMA was able to consult for. This document sets out a summary of the responses received by ESMA regarding the fee structure for registration, supervision and recognition of TRs in the EU and includes ESMA’s final technical advice to the Commission on the future Regulation on fees for TRs which will be adopted by the Commission in the form of a delegated act. It is worth noting that all major ESMA proposals were supported by respondents and where comments were received ESMA has considered how best to adjust the original proposals. Next steps ESMA will follow-up on this work with the Commission as they work on the adoption of the Commission delegated regulation on fees for TRs. |
|||
01/08/2013 | 2013/1072 | Practical arrangements for the late transposition of the AIFMD | Fund Management | Opinion | PDF 93.1 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has published an Opinion on arrangements for the late imposition of the AIFMD. The scope of the opinion is confined to the provision of collective portfolio management services. Arrangements before implementation of the Directive in all Member States Notification of marketing of EU AIFs when the host MS of the AIFM has not transposed the Directive (Articles 31 and 32 of the Directive) ESMA believes that, if the Directive has been transposed in the home MS of the AIFM, the competent authority of the host MS of the AIFM (Article 32) or home MS of the AIFM (Article 31) may not refuse a valid notification under the Directive on the ground that the Directive has not yet been transposed in the host MS. This applies irrespective of whether the marketing is done using the freedom to provide services or by means of a branch. Management passport (Article 33 of the Directive) ESMA believes that AIFMs established in a MS that has transposed the Directive should be able to manage an EU AIF via the management passport, both using the freedom to provide services or by means of a branch, in a MS where the Directive has not been transposed, irrespective of the provisions currently in place in such jurisdiction since the relevant provisions of the Directive are of a self-executing nature, and provided the AIFM is authorised to manage that type of AIF in accordance with Article 33(1) of the AIFMD. Any local restrictions on AIFMs that are not in accordance with the AIFMD will need to be disapplied. | |||
03/09/2013 | 2013/1157 | Technical advice on third country regulatory equivalence under EMIR – US | Post Trading | Technical Advice | PDF 5.06 MB |
||||
03/09/2013 | 2013/1158 | Technical advice on third country regulatory equivalence under EMIR – Japan | Post Trading | Technical Advice | PDF 3.76 MB |
||||
03/09/2013 | 2013/1159 | Technical advice on third country regulatory equivalence under EMIR – Australia | Post Trading | Technical Advice | PDF 3.82 MB |
||||
03/09/2013 | 2013/1161 | Technical advice on third country regulatory equivalence under EMIR – Singapore | Post Trading | Technical Advice | PDF 3.55 MB |
||||
03/09/2013 | 2013/1162 | Technical advice on third country regulatory equivalence under EMIR – Switzerland | Post Trading | Technical Advice | PDF 3.65 MB |
||||
03/09/2013 | 2013/1160 | Technical advice on third country regulatory equivalence under EMIR – Hong Kong | Post Trading | Technical Advice | PDF 3.57 MB |
||||
02/10/2013 | 2013/1372 | ESMA Technical advice on equivalence of Singapore for TRs (Supplement) | Post Trading | Technical Advice | PDF 500.37 KB |
||||
02/10/2013 | 2013/1369 | ESMA Technical advice on equivalence of Hong Kong for OTC and TR (Supplement) | Post Trading | Technical Advice | PDF 124.15 KB |
||||
02/10/2013 | 2013/1371 | ESMA Technical advice on equivalence of South Korea for CCPs | Post Trading | Technical Advice | PDF 1.83 MB |
||||
18/12/2013 | 2013/1944 | Format of the base prospectus and consistent application of Article 26(4) of the Prospectus Regulation | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Opinion | PDF 75.6 KB |