ESMA LIBRARY
REFINE YOUR SEARCH
Sections
- (-) Remove Credit Rating Agencies filter Credit Rating Agencies
- (-) Remove Prospectus filter Prospectus
- (-) Remove Market Integrity filter Market Integrity
- (-) Remove Securitisation filter Securitisation
- (-) Remove IFRS Supervisory Convergence filter IFRS Supervisory Convergence
- (-) Remove European Single Electronic Format filter European Single Electronic Format
- CESR Archive (200) Apply CESR Archive filter
- Corporate Information (77) Apply Corporate Information filter
- Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group (76) Apply Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group filter
- Post Trading (52) Apply Post Trading filter
- Fund Management (37) Apply Fund Management filter
- MiFID - Secondary Markets (29) Apply MiFID - Secondary Markets filter
- Joint Committee (25) Apply Joint Committee filter
- MiFID - Investor Protection (24) Apply MiFID - Investor Protection filter
- Corporate Disclosure (15) Apply Corporate Disclosure filter
- Market Abuse (12) Apply Market Abuse filter
- Benchmarks (9) Apply Benchmarks filter
- Planning reporting budget (7) Apply Planning reporting budget filter
- Trading (7) Apply Trading filter
- Short Selling (5) Apply Short Selling filter
- Supervisory convergence (5) Apply Supervisory convergence filter
- Board of Supervisors (4) Apply Board of Supervisors filter
- Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors (4) Apply Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors filter
- Securities Financing Transactions (4) Apply Securities Financing Transactions filter
- Sustainable finance (4) Apply Sustainable finance filter
- Transparency (4) Apply Transparency filter
- Corporate Governance (3) Apply Corporate Governance filter
- Guidelines and Technical standards (3) Apply Guidelines and Technical standards filter
- Innovation and Products (3) Apply Innovation and Products filter
- Trade Repositories (3) Apply Trade Repositories filter
- CCP Directorate (2) Apply CCP Directorate filter
- Corporate Finance (2) Apply Corporate Finance filter
- Management Board (2) Apply Management Board filter
- MiFID II: Transparency Calculations and DVC (1) Apply MiFID II: Transparency Calculations and DVC filter
Type of document
- (-) Remove Consultation Paper filter Consultation Paper
- (-) Remove Annual Report filter Annual Report
- (-) Remove SMSG Advice filter SMSG Advice
- Reference (115) Apply Reference filter
- Press Release (94) Apply Press Release filter
- Final Report (60) Apply Final Report filter
- Guidelines & Recommendations (45) Apply Guidelines & Recommendations filter
- Statement (43) Apply Statement filter
- Report (41) Apply Report filter
- Opinion (36) Apply Opinion filter
- Letter (31) Apply Letter filter
- Decision (23) Apply Decision filter
- Technical Advice (15) Apply Technical Advice filter
- Speech (10) Apply Speech filter
- Technical Standards (6) Apply Technical Standards filter
- Q&A (5) Apply Q&A filter
- Compliance table (3) Apply Compliance table filter
- CESR Document (2) Apply CESR Document filter
Date | Ref. | Title | Section | Type | Download | Info | Summary | Related Documents | Translated versions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
14/04/2011 | 2011/114 | Consultation paper- ESMA´s Technical Advice to the Commission on Fees for CRA Supervision | Credit Rating Agencies | Consultation Paper | PDF 95.52 KB |
||||
15/06/2011 | 2011/141 | Consultation paper- ESMA’s technical advice on possible delegated acts concerning the Prospectus Directive as amended by the Directive 2010/73/EU | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Consultation Paper | PDF 1.45 MB |
||||
26/05/2011 | 2011/155 | Call for evidence- assessment of compliance of credit rating agencies with Article 8.3 of the Credit Rating Agencies Regulation (1060/2009/EC) | Credit Rating Agencies | Consultation Paper | PDF 69.4 KB |
||||
26/05/2011 | 2011/156 | Call for evidence- ratings data periodic reporting requirements for CRAs according to Article 21 (3)(e) of the Draft Amended CRA Regulation | Credit Rating Agencies | Consultation Paper | PDF 88.95 KB |
||||
19/09/2011 | 2011/302 | Consultation paper- Regulatory technical standards on the information to be provided to ESMA by a credit rating agency in its application for registration and certification and for the assessment of its systemic importance | Credit Rating Agencies | Consultation Paper | PDF 276.02 KB |
||||
19/09/2011 | 2011/303 | Consultation paper- Regulatory technical standards on the assessment of compliance of credit rating method-ologies with the requirements set out in Article 8(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 | Credit Rating Agencies | Consultation Paper | PDF 374.84 KB |
||||
19/09/2011 | 2011/304 | Consultation paper- ESMA’s draft Regulatory Technical Standards on the presentation of the information that credit rating agencies shall disclose in accordance with Article 11(2) and point 1 of Part II of Section E of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1060/2 | Credit Rating Agencies | Consultation Paper | PDF 182.29 KB |
||||
19/09/2011 | 2011/305 | Consultation paper- ESMA’s Draft Regulatory Technical Standards on the content and format of ratings data periodic reporting to be submitted from credit rating agencies | Credit Rating Agencies | Consultation Paper | PDF 264 KB |
||||
26/01/2011 | 2011/35 | Call for evidence- Request for technical advice on possible delegated acts concerning the Prospectus Directive (2003/71/EC) as amended by the Directive 2010/73/EU | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Consultation Paper | PDF 3.85 MB |
||||
10/11/2011 | 2011/373 | Consultation paper- Considerations of materiality in financial reporting | Corporate Disclosure, IFRS Supervisory Convergence | Consultation Paper | PDF 170.93 KB |
||||
13/12/2011 | 2011/444 | ESMA’s technical advice on possible delegated acts concerning the Prospectus Directive as amended by the Directive 2010/73/EU | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Consultation Paper | PDF 1.15 MB |
The purpose of this consultation document from ESMA is to seek comments on the technical advice that ESMA proposes to give to the European Commission on a number of possible delegated acts. | |||
14/01/2011 | 2011/5 | Call for evidence- criteria for endorsement (Article 21 (2)(a) of the draft amended CRA Regulation) | Credit Rating Agencies | Consultation Paper | PDF 218.02 KB |
||||
18/03/2011 | 2011/97 | Consultation paper- ESMA Guidelines on the application of the endorsement regime under Article 4 (3) of the Credit Rating Regulation1060/2009 | Credit Rating Agencies | Consultation Paper | PDF 273.66 KB |
||||
07/05/2012 | 2012/278 | Call for evidence on Transaction reporting | Market Integrity | Consultation Paper | PDF 286 KB |
This call for evidence seeks to collect interested parties’ views on what elements ESMA should consider in its work on guidelines on harmonised transaction reporting, as well as opinions on what areas of the OTC derivatives guidelines need to be updated. On the basis of responses received to this call for evidence, ESMA will define its further work on guidelines on harmonised transaction reporting and launch a full public consultation. | |||
20/06/2012 | 2012/380 | ESMA’s technical advice on possible delegated acts concerning the Prospectus Directive as amended by the Directive 2010/73/EU | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Consultation Paper | PDF 1.49 MB |
Responses to this consultation paper should be submitted online by 20 August 2012. | |||
01/10/2012 | 2012/607 | Further amendments to ESMA’s Recommendations for the consistent implementation of the Prospectus Regulation regarding mineral companies | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Consultation Paper | PDF 481.61 KB |
||||
20/12/2012 | 2012/841 | Guidelines and recommendations on the scope of the CRA Regulation | Credit Rating Agencies | Consultation Paper | PDF 255.36 KB |
||||
19/07/2013 | 2013/1013 | Guidelines on enforcement of financial information | Corporate Disclosure, IFRS Supervisory Convergence | Consultation Paper | PDF 540.55 KB |
Responding to this paper The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) is seeking comments on all matters covered in this paper and in particular on the specific questions summarised in Annex 1. Comments are most helpful if they: respond to the question stated; indicate the specific question to which the comment relates; contain a clear rationale; and describe any alternatives ESMA should consider. Deadline ESMA will consider all comments received by 15 October 2013. All contributions should be submitted online at www.esma.europa.eu under the heading “Your input - Consultations” Publication of responses All contributions received will be published following the close of the consultation, unless you request otherwise. Please clearly and prominently indicate in your submission any part you do not wish to be publicly disclosed. A standard confidentiality statement in an email message will not be treated as a request for non-disclosure. A confidential response may be requested from us in accordance with ESMA’s rules on access to documents. We may consult you if we receive such a request. Any decision we make not to disclose the response is reviewable by ESMA’s Board of Appeal and the European Ombudsman. Data protection Information on data protection can be found at www.esma.europa.eu under the heading “Legal Notice”. Who should read this paper All interested parties are invited to respond to this consultation paper. It will primarily be of interest to those charged with the governance of issuers preparing financial information, users of financial information, auditors, and other parties who have a particular interest in financial reporting. |
|||
14/11/2013 | 2013/1649 | ESMA’s policy orientations on possible implementing measures under the Market Abuse Regulation | Market Abuse, Market Integrity | Consultation Paper | PDF 950.26 KB |
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has published a Discussion Paper setting out its initial views on the implementing measures it will have to develop for the new Market Abuse Regulation (MAR). MAR aims to enhance market integrity and investor protection. It will achieve this by updating and strengthening the existing market abuse framework, by extending its scope to new markets and trading strategies, and by introducing new requirements. The Discussion Paper presents positions and regulatory options on those issues where ESMA will have to develop MAR implementing measures, likely to include Regulatory Technical Standards, Delegated Acts and Guidelines. These implementing measures are of fundamental importance to the new regime, as they set out how MAR’s enlarged scope is to be implemented in practice by market participants, trading platforms, investors, issuers and persons related to financial markets. In developing these regulatory options ESMA, where similar requirements already exist under the current Market Abuse Directive (MAD), has taken into consideration the existing MAD Level 2 texts and ESMA/CESR guidelines to set out the DP positions in light of the extended scope of MAR. This Discussion Paper is based on the version of the MAR Level 1 text agreed by the European Parliament, the Council and the European Commission on 24 June 2013. Consultation Reference 2013/1649 Closing date for responses Monday, 27 January 2014 Contact market.integrity[at]esma.europa.eu | |||
15/03/2013 | 2013/316 | Draft Regulatory Technical Standards on specific situations that require the publication of a supplement to the prospectus | Prospectus, Corporate Disclosure | Consultation Paper | PDF 672.89 KB |
The Consultation Paper sets out a draft Regulatory Technical Standard concerning situations that require the systematic publication of a supplement to the prospectus which the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) is obliged to develop in accordance with Article 16(3) of the Prospectus Directive. The listed situations are concrete examples of the general obligation in Article 16(1) to mention in a supplement every significant new factor, material mistake or inaccuracy relating to information included in the prospectus which is capable of affecting the assessment of the securities. ESMA believes that the test whether a new factor, mistake or inaccuracy qualifies as a triggering event for producing a supplement is the same test as whether information should be included in the prospectus. As a consequence, significance or materiality should be assessed according to the same qualitative and/or quantitative criteria used when drafting the prospectus. In light of this, ESMA has identified a short list comprising 10 situations, which will always require issuers, offerors or persons asking for admission to trading to draw up and publish a supplement to the prospectus.The CP includes a draft Regulatory Technical Standard setting out the situations that would require a systematic publication of a supplement as well as the minimum content of such a supplement. Responses to the consultation should be submitted online by 28 June 2013. |