ESMA LIBRARY
The ESMA Library contains all ESMA documents. Please use the search and filter options to find specific documents.
90
REFINE YOUR SEARCH
Sections
- (-) Remove Guidelines and Technical standards filter Guidelines and Technical standards
- (-) Remove Joint Committee filter Joint Committee
- (-) Remove Trade Repositories filter Trade Repositories
- (-) Remove European Single Electronic Format filter European Single Electronic Format
- (-) Remove MiFID II: Transparency Calculations and DVC filter MiFID II: Transparency Calculations and DVC
- (-) Remove Press Releases filter Press Releases
- (-) Remove Procurement filter Procurement
- CESR Archive (200) Apply CESR Archive filter
- Corporate Information (84) Apply Corporate Information filter
- Post Trading (61) Apply Post Trading filter
- Credit Rating Agencies (58) Apply Credit Rating Agencies filter
- Fund Management (53) Apply Fund Management filter
- MiFID - Investor Protection (44) Apply MiFID - Investor Protection filter
- MiFID - Secondary Markets (43) Apply MiFID - Secondary Markets filter
- Board of Supervisors (22) Apply Board of Supervisors filter
- CCP Directorate (22) Apply CCP Directorate filter
- Board of Appeal (18) Apply Board of Appeal filter
- Corporate Disclosure (17) Apply Corporate Disclosure filter
- Market Abuse (17) Apply Market Abuse filter
- Market Integrity (17) Apply Market Integrity filter
- Management Board (16) Apply Management Board filter
- Prospectus (14) Apply Prospectus filter
- Short Selling (14) Apply Short Selling filter
- Benchmarks (12) Apply Benchmarks filter
- Trading (10) Apply Trading filter
- Planning reporting budget (9) Apply Planning reporting budget filter
- Securitisation (9) Apply Securitisation filter
- Supervisory convergence (7) Apply Supervisory convergence filter
- COVID-19 (6) Apply COVID-19 filter
- Innovation and Products (5) Apply Innovation and Products filter
- Securities Financing Transactions (5) Apply Securities Financing Transactions filter
- Transparency (5) Apply Transparency filter
- IFRS Supervisory Convergence (4) Apply IFRS Supervisory Convergence filter
- Market data (4) Apply Market data filter
- Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors (4) Apply Risk Analysis & Economics - Markets Infrastructure Investors filter
- Corporate Finance (3) Apply Corporate Finance filter
- Corporate Governance (3) Apply Corporate Governance filter
- Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group (3) Apply Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group filter
- Careers (2) Apply Careers filter
- Sustainable finance (2) Apply Sustainable finance filter
- Crowdfunding (1) Apply Crowdfunding filter
Type of document
- (-) Remove Compliance table filter Compliance table
- (-) Remove Consultation Paper filter Consultation Paper
- (-) Remove Decision filter Decision
- (-) Remove Annual Report filter Annual Report
- Guidelines & Recommendations (569) Apply Guidelines & Recommendations filter
- Press Release (334) Apply Press Release filter
- Reference (149) Apply Reference filter
- CLOSED Procedure (73) Apply CLOSED Procedure filter
- Final Report (53) Apply Final Report filter
- Statement (43) Apply Statement filter
- Report (26) Apply Report filter
- Letter (25) Apply Letter filter
- Summary of Conclusions (11) Apply Summary of Conclusions filter
- Q&A (9) Apply Q&A filter
- Speech (8) Apply Speech filter
- SMSG Advice (4) Apply SMSG Advice filter
- Opinion (3) Apply Opinion filter
- Investor Warning (2) Apply Investor Warning filter
- ONGOING Procedure (2) Apply ONGOING Procedure filter
- Technical Advice (2) Apply Technical Advice filter
- Technical Standards (2) Apply Technical Standards filter
- CESR Document (1) Apply CESR Document filter
Your filters
European Single Electronic Format X Guidelines and Technical standards X MiFID II: Transparency Calculations and DVC X Procurement X Trade Repositories X Press Releases X Joint Committee X Decision X Annual Report X Consultation Paper X Compliance table X
Reset all filtersDate | Ref. | Title | Section | Type | Download | Info | Summary | Related Documents | Translated versions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
06/03/2012 | JC/DP/2012/1 | Joint Discussion Paper on Draft Regulatory Technical Standards on risk mitigation techniques for OTC derivatives not cleared by a CCP under the Regulation on OTC derivatives, CCPs and Trade Repositories | Joint Committee | Consultation Paper | PDF 402.37 KB |
EBA, EIOPA and ESMA (the ESAs) invite market participants and all interested stakeholders to provide their feedback on planned regulatory technical standards covering risk mitigation techniques for OTC derivatives not cleared by central counterparties. The EMIR Regulation (“the Regulation”) on OTC Derivatives, CCPs and trade repositories introduces provisions to improve transparency and reduce the risks associated with the OTC derivatives market and establishes common rules for central counterparties (CCPs) and for trade repositories (TRs). The Regulation acknowledges that not all OTC derivatives would meet the necessary requirements to be centrally cleared. For this reason, it introduces provisions on risk mitigation techniques for OTC derivatives not cleared by a CCP. | |||
14/05/2012 | JC/CP/2012/01 | EBA, EIOPA and ESMA’s Joint Consultation Paper on its proposed response to the Commission’s Review of the Financial Conglomerates Directive | Joint Committee | Consultation Paper | PDF 590.22 KB |
||||
31/08/2012 | JC/CP/2012/02 | Joint consultation paper on Draft Regulatory Technical Standards on the uniform conditions of application of the calculation methods under Article 6.2 of the Financial Conglomerates Directive | Joint Committee | Consultation Paper | PDF 769.24 KB |
Please send your comments to the EBA, EIOPA and ESMA by email to joint-committee@eba.europa.eu, jointcommittee@eiopa.europa.eu and joint.committee@esma.europa.eu by 05.10.2012, indicating the reference ‘JC CP 2012 02’ in the subject field. Please note that comments submitted after the deadline, or sent to another e-mail address will not be processed. | |||
24/10/2012 | JC/CP/2012/01 Responses | Responses to the Joint CP on Financial Conglomerates | Joint Committee | Consultation Paper | PDF 183.7 KB |
||||
25/10/2012 | JC/CP/2012/02 Responses | Responses to the second Joint CP on Financial Conglomerates | Joint Committee | Consultation Paper | ZIP 4.54 MB |
||||
24/06/2013 | BoA 2013-008 | Board of Appeal Decision | Joint Committee, Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 242.72 KB |
The joint Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities (EBA, ESMA and EIOPA) has published today its decision in an appeal brought by an Estonian company against a decision of the EBA. It concerned the question whether the suitability of the managers of a significant branch of a bank may be a matter within EU law, and not just national law. Allowing the appeal, the Board of Appeal interpreted Directive No. 2006/48/EC consistently with the EBA Guidelines on the assessment of the suitability of members of the management body and key function holders. It came to the conclusion that the “fit and proper” requirement is not restricted to the persons who direct the business of the credit institution. The matter therefore was within the EBA’s powers of investigation. Although the appellant criticised the way in which the EBA dealt with its complaint, the Board of Appeal made it clear that it did not accept that criticism. It considered that the EBA dealt with the complaint in an appropriate manner. The ground on which the appeal was allowed was one of interpretation of the applicable legal provisions. The case was remitted to the EBA to adopt the appropriate decision in accordance with the Board of Appeal’s findings. This is for information only. The decision consists of the signed Decision only. For any enquiries, please contact EIOPA’s Press Office: Anzhelika Mayer Tel.: +49 69 9511 1968 | |||
06/11/2013 | JC-CP-2013-03 | Draft guidelines for complaints-handling for the securities (ESMA) and banking (EBA) sectors | Joint Committee | Consultation Paper | PDF 192.58 KB |
Reasons for publication Consumers in the EU can purchase, and firms can offer, financial services and products in the investment, banking and insurance sectors across the EU Single Market. In order to increase market confidence of all participants, the Joint Committee of the three European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) is seeking to develop a harmonised approach to handling complaints. The three ESAs are doing so through guidelines that, once adopted, will apply equally across all 28 Member States and will be the same for all three sectors of financial services. To that end, ESMA and the EBA have developed guidelines for the investment and banking sectors that build on the existing complaints-handling guidelines established by EIOPA for the insurance sector. The objective is to allow EU consumers to refer to a single set of complaints-handling arrangements, irrespective of the type of product or service or the geographical location of the firm in question. This, in turn, will also allow firms to streamline and standardise their complaints-handling arrangements, and national regulators to supervise the same requirements across all sectors of financial services. ESMA and the EBA expect to publish the final guidelines in Q1 2014. Consultation process Comments should be sent to ESMA and the EBA by e-mail to sarah.raisin@esma.europa.eu and joint-committee@eba.europa.eu. Please note that the deadline for the submission of comments is 7 February 2014. All contributions received will be published following the close of the consultation, unless requested otherwise. | |||
07/11/2013 | JC CP 2013 02 | Joint Consultation Paper On Mechanistic references to credit ratings in the ESAs’ guidelines and recommendations | Joint Committee | Consultation Paper | PDF 347.81 KB |
The Joint Committee of the European Supervisory Authorities (EBA, ESMA and EIOPA - ESAs) is launching today a one-month public consultation on the removal of mechanistic references to credit ratings in their guidelines and on the definition of sole and mechanistic reliance on such ratings. The term “sole and mechanistic reliance on credit ratings” is mentioned in Article 5b(1) of the European Regulation on Credit Rating Agencies (Regulation (EU) No 462/2013). However, neither its formal definition nor explanations of its meaning are included in the document. In order to have a common approach towards this issue, the ESAs have developed a definition of “sole and mechanistic reliance”, and are consulting with market participants on whether this definition is clear and can be used in practice. The consultation paper contains: - a proposed definition for “sole or mechanistic reliance”, including examples; - the provisions in the three ESAs’ guidelines that are not to be defined as mechanistic; and - those provisions that are to be considered as mechanistic and therefore should be amended. The ESAs intend to refer to this definition in all their future guidelines, recommendations and draft technical standards where relevant. The current public consultation also contributes to the initiative of the Financial Stability Board to reduce the reliance on ratings. The consultation paper is available on the websites of the three ESAs: EBA, ESMA and EIOPA. The consultation will end at close of business on 5 December. Responses can be made here. | |||
13/01/2014 | BoA 2013-014 | Board of Appeal Decision Global Private Rating Company v. ESMA | Joint Committee, Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 361.96 KB |
Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities dismisses appeal made by a refused CRA-applicant against ESMA On 10 January 2014, the Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities handed down its decision on an appeal by the appellant, Global Private Rating Company “Standard Rating” Ltd, against the refusal by the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) to register it as a credit rating agency. This is the first appeal against a decision by ESMA refusing an applicant registration as a credit rating agency. The Board of Appeal unanimously decided that the appeal should be dismissed, and that ESMA’s refusal decision should be confirmed. It stated that it accepted the appellant’s point that the registration of a credit rating agency by ESMA is a new process, and recognised that the procedures will to an extent take time fully to work out. Nevertheless, because of the responsibilities placed on credit rating agencies and their importance in the financial system generally, it considered that the onus must be on an applicant to satisfy ESMA that the relevant requirements are met. The application and its contents must be very clear, and it is not ESMA’s responsibility as regulator to remedy deficiencies. | |||
14/04/2014 | JC/CP/2014/03 | EBA, ESMA and EIOPA consultation paper on draft technical standards under EMIR | Joint Committee | Consultation Paper | PDF 1.11 MB |
||||
24/04/2014 | 2013/922 | Compliance table- suitability guidelines | MiFID - Investor Protection, Guidelines and Technical standards | Compliance table | PDF 74.33 KB |
||||
24/04/2014 | 2013/923 | Compliance table- compliance guidelines | Guidelines and Technical standards, MiFID - Investor Protection | Compliance table | PDF 100.87 KB |
||||
17/07/2014 | 2014/C1/02 | Board of Appeal Decision | Joint Committee, Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 368.94 KB |
The Joint Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities (the European Banking Authority, the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority and the European Securities and Markets Authority) published its decision in an appeal brought by SV Capital OÜ, an Estonian company, against a decision of the EBA. This was the second appeal to be considered by the Board of Appeal in this matter between the same parties concerning the question whether the suitability of the managers of a significant branch of a bank raised a question of Union law. Following the Board of Appeal’s affirmative decision of 24 June 2013, the appellant requested the EBA to initiate an investigation against the Estonian and Finnish Financial Supervision Authorities because their alleged failure to take action in respect of individuals in the Estonian branch of Nordea Bank Finland PLC whom it was alleged were not fit and proper persons to be key function holders in the bank. The EBA decided that it would not initiate an investigation. The Board of Appeal decided that the EBA had been right to raise the matter with the national supervisors, but that having done so, it was entitled to take no further action in the light of their responses. The Board accordingly dismissed the appellant’s appeal against the EBA’s decision. | |||
24/07/2014 | CP/2014/04 | Draft Regulatory Technical Standards on risk concentration and intra-group transactions under Article 21a (1a) of the Financial Conglomerates Directive | Joint Committee | Consultation Paper | PDF 324.25 KB |
Please send your comments to the EBA and EIOPA using the following links: Respond to the EBA. Respond to EIOPA. The consultation period closes on 24 October 2014. | |||
30/10/2014 | JC/2014/01 add | Addendum to Joint CP on draft ITS on the mapping of ECAIs | Joint Committee | Consultation Paper | PDF 157.22 KB |
The Joint Committee of the three European Supervisory Authorities (EBA, ESMA and EIOPA - ESAs) published today an addendum to the joint consultation on the mapping of the credit assessments to risk weights of External Credit Assessment Institutions (ECAIs). The addendum provides further details on the application of the rules proposed in the draft Implementing Technical Standards (ITS) in relation to particular ECAIs and is to be considered as an extension of the consultation process. The consultation period will be reopened until 30 November 2014 in order to collect additional comments. In line with the specifications included in the joint Consultation Paper published in February 2014, this addendum contains the individual mapping tables of all relevant ECAIs. The proposed mappings establish the level of capital that financial institutions should hold in order to ensure the safety and soundness of the EU financial system. These draft mappings are based on the amount of objective information available for each ECAI regarding the performance of its credit ratings. Therefore, the draft mappings mainly reflect the historical ability of ECAIs to anticipate negative credit events. For those cases where only a small number of credit ratings were available, the draft mappings have to a large extent relied on alternative information; whereas, when no relevant information was found, a certain degree of prudence has been applied. Furthermore, the addendum contains some additional aspects resulting from the cost-benefit/impact assessment analysis. The analysis shows that the proposals for the largest ECAIs are not expected to have a significant impact on financial institutions in terms of capital requirements. Only in very specific cases the average capital requirement associated with a particular ECAI might increase by up to 10%. In the case of ECAIs that currently have no mapping established, the impact is expected to reflect the true risk profile of the rated entities. In addition, the EBA also published the individual draft mapping reports that illustrate how the rules proposed in the draft ITS were applied. The draft mappings will be reviewed in light of any comments received during the consultation process. Consultation process The consultation deadline is 30 November 2014 and responses can be submitted here. All contributions received will be published following the close of the consultation, unless requested otherwise. Draft Mapping Reports | |||
17/11/2014 | JC/DP/2014/02 | Discussion Paper- Key Information Documents for Packaged Retail and Insurance-based Investment Products (PRIIPs) | Fund Management, Joint Committee | Consultation Paper | PDF 1.38 MB |
EBA, EIOPA, and ESMA (the ESAs) welcome comments on this Discussion Paper on Key Information Documents for Packaged Retail and Insurance-based Investment Products (PRIIPs).Comments can be sent by clicking on the ‘input’ button on the consultation page of one of the ESA’s websites. Please note that the deadline for the submission of comments is 17 February 2015. Comments submitted after this deadline, or submitted via other means may not be processed. It is important to note that although you may not be able to respond to each and every question, the ESAs would encourage partial responses from stakeholders on those questions that they believe are most relevant to them.Publication of responsesAll contributions received will be published following the close of the consultation, unless you request otherwise in the consultation form. A confidential response may be requested from us in accordance with the ESA’s rules on public access to documents.1 We may consult you if we receive such a request. Any decision we make not to disclose the response is reviewable by the Board of Appeal of the ESA’s and the European Ombudsman.Data protectionInformation on data protection can be found at the different ESA’s websites under the heading ‘Legal notice' | |||
02/12/2014 | 2014/BOA/05 | Decision by the ESA BoA concerning Investor Protection Europe sprl | Joint Committee, Board of Appeal | Decision | PDF 229.85 KB |
The Joint Board of Appeal of the ESAs decides on the inadmissibility of an appeal brought by IPE sprl, a company based in Brussels, against a decision by ESMAThe Joint Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities published today its decision in an appeal brought by Investor Protection Europe (IPE) sprl, a company based in Brussels, against a decision of the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) of 10 June 2014 not to initiate an investigation under Article 17 of the ESMA Regulation regarding an alleged breach of Union law by the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier of Luxembourg. The Board of Appeal unanimously decided that the appeal was inadmissible, and in the light of that decision, did not consider the substance of IPE’s complaint. | |||
22/12/2014 | JC/CP/2014/05 | Joint Committee Consultation Paper on guidelines for cross-selling practices | Joint Committee | Consultation Paper | PDF 366.32 KB |
The Joint Committee of the three European Supervisory Authorities (EBA, EIOPA and ESMA) published today a consultation paper on draft Guidelines for regulating cross-selling practices in the financial sector across the EU. These guidelines establish a coherent and effective approach in supervising firms that offer cross-selling options, so as to enhancing protection of EU customers. The consultation will run until XX March 2015. The draft Guidelines are aimed at EU competent authorities and develop further how EU firms engaging in cross-selling practices in the financial sector should comply with the general conduct of business standards expected toward customers. In particular, the Guidelines provide an approach for supervising firms valid across the EU and give more scope for EU customers to take better informed purchasing decisions. While cross-selling financial products can benefit customers by reducing the cost of purchase, cross-selling can also result in customers purchasing products that they do not necessarily want or may be unsuitable for their needs or will bind consumers in a long-term contractual agreement. In order to address these risks, the Joint Committee of the three European Supervisory Authorities developed requirements for enhanced disclosure and transparency around prices, costs and other non-price features, such as how the risks change as a result of buying products as a package. The Guidelines also require that all relevant information is communicated in a timely and exhaustive manner, hence improving customer understanding of the purchase and the suitability/appropriateness of the cross-sold package. The proposed Guidelines of the Joint Committee are developed under Article 16 of the Founding Regulations of the three ESAs. The Joint Committee expects to publish the final guidelines in Q2 2015. Consultation process The consultation paper is available on the websites of the three ESAs: EBA, ESMA and EIOPA. Comments to this consultation paper can be sent here. | |||
23/12/2014 | JC/DP/2014/01 | Discussion Paper- The Use of Credit Ratings by Financial Intermediaries Article 5(a) of the CRA Regulation | Credit Rating Agencies, Joint Committee | Consultation Paper | PDF 538.9 KB |
||||
18/02/2015 | JC/GL/2014/43 Appendix 1 | Compliance table for JC guidelines for complaints-handling for the securities (ESMA) and banking (EBA) sectors | Guidelines and Technical standards, Joint Committee | Compliance table | PDF 187.15 KB |
The table contains details of the competent authorities* who comply or intend to comply with the ESAs’ Joint Guidelines on complaints-handling for the securities (ESMA) and banking (EBA) sectors. |