ESMA LIBRARY

The ESMA Library contains all ESMA documents. Please use the search and filter options to find specific documents.
24
DOCUMENTS

REFINE YOUR SEARCH

Sections

Type of document

Your filters
Benchmarks X Trade Repositories X Press Releases X Corporate Disclosure X Joint Committee X Q&A X Decision X Annual Report X
Reset all filters
Date Ref. Title Section Type Download Info Summary Related Documents Translated versions
30/11/2021 SFDR EC Q&A CORRECTION EC Q&A on sustainability-related disclosures- correction , Q&A PDF
87.19 KB
26/07/2021 SFDR EC Q&A EC Q&A on sustainability-related disclosures , Q&A PDF
601.99 KB
25/08/2021 Joint Committee JC 2017 Q&A on the PRIIPs Key Information Document Q&A PDF
1.51 MB
07/04/2021 JC 2021 08 Joint Committee Annual Report 2020 Annual Report PDF
1.01 MB
09/03/2020 ESMA80-199-332 ESMA Supervision- Annual Report 2019 and Work Programme 2020 , , , , Annual Report PDF
825.72 KB
30/09/2021 ESMA74-362-893 QAs on SFTR data reporting , , Q&A PDF
356.79 KB
03/11/2020 ESMA71-99-1423 QA Fast Track Peer Review- Wirecard , , Q&A PDF
248.14 KB
01/12/2021 ESMA70-1861941480-52 Q&A on EMIR implementation , Q&A PDF
1.48 MB
19/11/2021 ESMA70-145-114 Q&A on the Benchmarks Regulation (BMR) , Q&A PDF
548.59 KB
23/09/2021 ESMA41-356-233 Decision- UnaVista Limited Decision PDF
996.23 KB
12/07/2021 ESMA41-356-187 Decision- DTCC Derivatives Repository , Decision PDF
1.13 MB
17/04/2020 ESMA32-51-370 Q&A on ESMA Guidelines on Alternative Performance Measures , Q&A PDF
329.01 KB
09/11/2020 ESMA31-67-127 Question and answers on Transparency Directive (TD) , , , , Q&A PDF
352.79 KB
11/04/2019 ESMA31-62-780 Q&A on Prospectus Related Topics , , , , , , Q&A PDF
957.9 KB
14/08/2015 BOA/2015/001 Decision of the Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities given under Article 60 of Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010 and the Board of Appeal’s Rules of Procedure (BOA 2012 002) , Decision PDF
147.78 KB
30/04/2018 BoA 2018-01 Decision in an appeal by A v ESMA , Decision PDF
392.62 KB
13/01/2014 BoA 2013-014 Board of Appeal Decision Global Private Rating Company v. ESMA , Decision PDF
361.96 KB
Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities dismisses appeal made by a refused CRA-applicant against ESMA On 10 January 2014, the Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities handed down its decision on an appeal by the appellant, Global Private Rating Company “Standard Rating” Ltd, against the refusal by the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) to register it as a credit rating agency. This is the first appeal against a decision by ESMA refusing an applicant registration as a credit rating agency. The Board of Appeal unanimously decided that the appeal should be dismissed, and that ESMA’s refusal decision should be confirmed. It stated that it accepted the appellant’s point that the registration of a credit rating agency by ESMA is a new process, and recognised that the procedures will to an extent take time fully to work out. Nevertheless, because of the responsibilities placed on credit rating agencies and their importance in the financial system generally, it considered that the onus must be on an applicant to satisfy ESMA that the relevant requirements are met. The application and its contents must be very clear, and it is not ESMA’s responsibility as regulator to remedy deficiencies.
24/06/2013 BoA 2013-008 Board of Appeal Decision , Decision PDF
242.72 KB
The joint Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities (EBA, ESMA and EIOPA) has published today its decision in an appeal brought by an Estonian company against a decision of the EBA. It concerned the question whether the suitability of the managers of a significant branch of a bank may be a matter within EU law, and not just national law. Allowing the appeal, the Board of Appeal interpreted Directive No. 2006/48/EC consistently with the EBA Guidelines on the assessment of the suitability of members of the management body and key function holders. It came to the conclusion that the “fit and proper” requirement is not restricted to the persons who direct the business of the credit institution. The matter therefore was within the EBA’s powers of investigation. Although the appellant criticised the way in which the EBA dealt with its complaint, the Board of Appeal made it clear that it did not accept that criticism. It considered that the EBA dealt with the complaint in an appropriate manner. The ground on which the appeal was allowed was one of interpretation of the applicable legal provisions. The case was remitted to the EBA to adopt the appropriate decision in accordance with the Board of Appeal’s findings. This is for information only. The decision consists of the signed Decision only. For any enquiries, please contact EIOPA’s Press Office: Anzhelika Mayer Tel.: +49 69 9511 1968
09/04/2019 2019 19 Joint Committee Annual Report 2018 Annual Report PDF
198.17 KB
19/12/2016 2016/JCESA QA Questions and Answers on Big Data Q&A PDF
333.65 KB